Radiological protection issues arising during and after the Fukushima nuclear reactor accident

Argentine Nuclear Regulatory Authority, Av. del Libertador 8520, (1429) Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Journal of Radiological Protection (Impact Factor: 1.32). 06/2013; 33(3):497-571. DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/33/3/497
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Following the Fukushima accident, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) convened a task group to compile lessons learned from the nuclear reactor accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan, with respect to the ICRP system of radiological protection. In this memorandum the members of the task group express their personal views on issues arising during and after the accident, without explicit endorsement of or approval by the ICRP.While the affected people were largely protected against radiation exposure and no one incurred a lethal dose of radiation (or a dose sufficiently large to cause radiation sickness), many radiological protection questions were raised. The following issues were identified: inferring radiation risks (and the misunderstanding of nominal risk coefficients); attributing radiation effects from low dose exposures; quantifying radiation exposure; assessing the importance of internal exposures; managing emergency crises; protecting rescuers and volunteers; responding with medical aid; justifying necessary but disruptive protective actions; transiting from an emergency to an existing situation; rehabilitating evacuated areas; restricting individual doses of members of the public; caring for infants and children; categorising public exposures due to an accident; considering pregnant women and their foetuses and embryos; monitoring public protection; dealing with 'contamination' of territories, rubble and residues and consumer products; recognising the importance of psychological consequences; and fostering the sharing of information.Relevant ICRP Recommendations were scrutinised, lessons were collected and suggestions were compiled.It was concluded that the radiological protection community has an ethical duty to learn from the lessons of Fukushima and resolve any identified challenges. Before another large accident occurs, it should be ensured that inter alia: radiation risk coefficients of potential health effects are properly interpreted; the limitations of epidemiological studies for attributing radiation effects following low exposures are understood; any confusion on protection quantities and units is resolved; the potential hazard from the intake of radionuclides into the body is elucidated; rescuers and volunteers are protected with an ad hoc system; clear recommendations on crisis management and medical care and on recovery and rehabilitation are available; recommendations on public protection levels (including infant, children and pregnant women and their expected offspring) and associated issues are consistent and understandable; updated recommendations on public monitoring policy are available; acceptable (or tolerable) 'contamination' levels are clearly stated and defined; strategies for mitigating the serious psychological consequences arising from radiological accidents are sought; and, last but not least, failures in fostering information sharing on radiological protection policy after an accident need to be addressed with recommendations to minimise such lapses in communication.

1 Follower
  • Journal of Radiological Protection 08/2014; 34(3):E7-E12. DOI:10.1088/0952-4746/34/3/E7 · 1.32 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The linear no-threshold (LNT) model of ionizing-radiation-induced cancer is based on the assumption that every radiation dose increment constitutes increased cancer risk for humans. The risk is hypothesized to increase linearly as the total dose increases. While this model is the basis for radiation safety regulations, its scientific validity has been questioned and debated for many decades. The recent memorandum of the International Commission on Radiological Protection admits that the LNT-model predictions at low doses are "speculative, unproven, undetectable and 'phantom'." Moreover, numerous experimental, ecological, and epidemiological studies show that low doses of sparsely-ionizing or sparsely-ionizing plus highly-ionizing radiation may be beneficial to human health (hormesis/adaptive response). The present LNT-model-based regulations impose excessive costs on the society. For example, the median-cost medical program is 5000 times more cost-efficient in saving lives than controlling radiation emissions. There are also lives lost: e.g., following Fukushima accident, more than 1000 disaster-related yet non-radiogenic premature deaths were officially registered among the population evacuated due to radiation concerns. Additional negative impacts of LNT-model-inspired radiophobia include: refusal of some patients to undergo potentially life-saving medical imaging; discouragement of the study of low-dose radiation therapies; motivation for radiological terrorism and promotion of nuclear proliferation.
    Dose-Response 05/2014; 12(2):342-8. DOI:10.2203/dose-response.13-044.Socol · 1.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is now over three years after the March 11 2011, 9.0 Richter scale earthquake and subsequent tsunami, which occurred in Tohoku Japan. The 14 m high tsunamis overrun the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant (FNPP) in the northeast of Japan causing the release of radioactive materials into the environment. This was as a result of the reactor rod meltdown and multiple explosions of hydrogen gas in the reactors after the backup cooling system failed. The accident lead to the atmospheric and oceanic dispersion of fission products around Japan and other parts of the World. We review the literature lessons learned from the accident in terms of nuclear safety and nuclear accident dosimetry. First, we considered the technical lessons learned from the accident by identifying some of the international activities to identify lessons learned and implement improvements that have taken place. These include the IAEA's nuclear safety action plan and the European Commission's nuclear power plant stress test process. Second, we used a combination of key words to search for relevant literature on the radio-ecological ramifications of the accident in Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Because of the significant number of Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) and their potential to increase in the future, effort present a treatise which addresses some of the major challenging issues of Fukushima nuclear accident is timely and relevant for the industry's future expansion.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Oct 28, 2014