Visual performance with sport-tinted contact lenses in natural sunlight.

Pacific University College of Optometry, OR 97116, USA.
Optometry and vision science: official publication of the American Academy of Optometry (Impact Factor: 2.04). 04/2009; 86(5):509-16. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31819f9aa2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The use of tinted and clear contact lenses (CLs) in all aspects of life is becoming a more popular occurrence, particularly in athletic activities. This study broadens previous research regarding performance-tinted CLs and their effects on measures of visual performance.
Thirty-three subjects (14 male, 19 female) were fitted with clear B&L Optima 38, 50% visible light transmission Amber and 36% visible light transmission Gray-Green Nike Maxsight CLs in an individualized randomized sequence. Subjects were dark-adapted with welding goggles before testing and in between subtests involving a Bailey-Lovie chart and the Haynes Distance Rock test. The sequence of testing was repeated for each lens modality.
The Amber and Gray-Green lenses enabled subjects to recover vision faster in bright sunlight compared with clear lenses. Also, subjects were able to achieve better visual recognition in bright sunlight when compared with clear lenses. Additionally, the lenses allowed the subjects to alternate fixation between a bright and shaded target at a more rapid rate in bright sunlight as compared with clear lenses. Subjects preferred both the Amber and Gray-Green lenses over clear lenses in the bright and shadowed target conditions.
The results of the current study show that Maxsight Amber and Gray-Green lenses provide better contrast discrimination in bright sunlight, better contrast discrimination when alternating between bright and shaded target conditions, better speed of visual recovery in bright sunlight, and better overall visual performance in bright and shaded target conditions compared with clear lenses.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Macular pigment (MP) is composed of the yellow, blue-absorbing carotenoids lutein and zeaxanthin. Although distributed throughout the visual system, MP is heavily concentrated in the central retinal area (eg, screening the foveal cones). Because light must pass through MP before reaching the receptors, it filters significant amounts of short-wave energy. Individual variation in peak absorbance is large and ranges from 0.0 to 1.6 optical density units depending largely on dietary intake. Several important functions of MP have been proposed. MP may serve to protect the retina from damage by absorbing actinic short-wave light (analogous to internal sunglasses) or by inactivating highly reactive free radicals and oxygen triplicates that are the by-product of light-driven cellular activity. MP may also serve, as proposed more than a century ago, to improve the retinal image through optical mechanisms. Recent data suggest that the MP carotenoids reduce glare discomfort and disability, shorten photostress recovery times, enhance chromatic contrast, and increase visual range (how far one can see in the distance). Lutein and zeaxanthin within the brain might also increase temporal processing speeds. This article reviews the influences of MP on visual function by exploring the implications of these visual improvements for baseball players.
    American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 10/2012; 96(5):1207S-13S. DOI:10.3945/ajcn.112.034876 · 6.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to clarify the effect of colored lenses on visual attributes related to sports activities. The subjects were 24 students (11 females, 13 males; average age 21.0 ±1.2 years) attending a sports university. Lenses of 5 colors were used: colorless, light yellow, dark yellow, light gray, and dark gray. For each lens, measurements were performed in a fixed order: contrast sensitivity, dynamic visual acuity, depth perception, hand-eye coordination and visual acuity and low-contrast visual acuity. The conditions for the measurements of visual acuity and low-contrast visual acuity were in the order of Evening, Evening+Glare, Day, and Day+Glare. There were no significant differences among lenses in dynamic visual acuity and depth perception. For hand-eye coordination, time was significantly shorter with colorless than dark gray lenses. Contrast sensitivity was significantly higher with colorless, light yellow, and light gray lenses than with dark yellow and dark gray lenses. The low-contrast visual acuity test in the Day+Glare condition showed no significant difference among the lenses. In the Evening condition, low-contrast visual acuity was significantly higher with colorless and light yellow lenses than with dark gray lenses, and in the Evening+Glare condition, low-contrast visual acuity was significantly higher with colorless lenses than with the other colors except light yellow. Under early evening conditions and during sports activities, light yellow lenses do not appear to have an adverse effect on visual attributes.
    Journal of Human Kinetics 03/2013; 36:27-36. DOI:10.2478/hukin-2013-0003 · 0.70 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Contrast sensitivity function was believed can be enhanced by wearing amber tinted lenses. However the increment varied with respect to significant diagnosis. The aim of this study was to assess contrast sensitivity with and without wearing amber lens between youth hockey player and non-hockey player. Preliminary examination was done to assess on refractive status and ocular health among eighty healthy male subject aged between 13 to 16 years old where they were divided into youth hockey player (n=40) and non-hockey player (n=40). Pelli-Robson contrast chart was used in measurement of contrast sensitivity with latest refractive correction, two times; with and without wearing amber tinted lens. Contrast sensitivity between youth hockey player and non-hockey player seems to show a significant difference in both conditions of without and with wearing amber tinted lens with statistical value U = 312.0, z = −4.95, p