Article

The efficacy of natalizumab in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: subgroup analyses of AFFIRM and SENTINEL.

Dept. of Neurology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Journal of Neurology (Impact Factor: 3.58). 04/2009; 256(3):405-15. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-009-0093-1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The AFFIRM and SENTINEL studies showed that natalizumab was effective both as monotherapy and in combination with interferon beta (IFNbeta)-1a in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Further analyses of AFFIRM and SENTINEL data were conducted to determine the efficacy of natalizumab in prespecified patient subgroups according to baseline characteristics: relapse history 1 year before randomization (1, 2, > or = 3), Expanded Disability Status Scale score (< or = 3.5, > 3.5), number of T2 lesions (< 9, > or = 9), presence of gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions (0, > or = 1), age (< 40, > or = 40) and gender (male, female). A post hoc analysis was conducted to determine the efficacy of natalizumab in patients with highly active disease (i. e., > or = 2 relapses in the year before study entry and > or = 1 Gd+ lesion at study entry). In both AFFIRM and SENTINEL studies natalizumab reduced the annualized relapse rates across all subgroups (except the small subgroups with < 9 baseline T2 lesions) over 2 years. In AFFIRM, natalizumab significantly reduced the risk of sustained disability progression in most subgroups. In SENTINEL, natalizumab significantly reduced the risk of sustained disability progression in the following subgroups: > or = 9 T2 lesions at baseline, > or = 1 Gd+ lesions at baseline, female patients and patients < 40 years of age. Natalizumab reduced the risk of disability progression by 64 % and relapse rate by 81 % in treatment- naive patients with highly active disease and by 58 % and 76 %, respectively, in patients with highly active disease despite IFNbeta-1a treatment. These results indicate that natalizumab is effective in reducing disability progression and relapses in patients with relapsing MS, particularly in patients with highly active disease.

1 Bookmark
 · 
116 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Multiple sclerosis is the most common non-traumatic neurodegenerative disease in adults. Most of the patients present with both physical and mental deficits which reflect the dissemination of the lesions in the central nervous system, produced by the inflammatory process. The incomplete recovery after relapses, the accumulation of new deficits and the progressive nature of the condition interfere with daily activities of individuals and have a negative impact on their well-being. Indeed, studies show that quality of life measurements are constantly lower in patients with multiple sclerosis. Estimation of health-related quality of life is being increasingly recognized as necessary when analysing the effectiveness of treatment modalities and for the follow up of patients with chronic diseases such as multiple sclerosis. Current immunomodulatory interventions that are shown to reduce the frequency of relapses and delay disease progression might also have a positive effect on quality of life measurements. Additive pharmacological agents that target cognitive impairments and common symptoms such as depression, fatigue and pain, along with life-style modifications and rehabilitation programmes are also important for the appropriate management that aims to improve quality of life.
    International Review of Psychiatry 01/2010; 22(1):67-82. · 1.80 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The term 'autoimmune diseases' encompasses a spectrum of diseases whose clinical manifestations and, possibly, biological features vary widely. The results of conventional treatment are considered unsatisfactory in aggressive forms, with subsets of patients having short life expectancies. Relying on wide experimental evidence and more feeble clinical data, some research groups have used autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in the most disabling autoimmune diseases with the aim of resetting the patient's immune system. Immunoablative conditioning regimens are preferred over their myeloablative counterparts, and some form of in vivo and/or ex vivo T-cell depletion is generally adopted. Despite 15 years' experience, published controlled clinical trials are still lacking, with the evidence so far available coming from pilot studies and registry surveys. In multiple sclerosis, clinical improvement, or at least lasting disease stabilization, can be achieved in the majority of the patients; nevertheless, the worst results are observed in patients with progressive disease, where no benefit can be expected from conventional therapy. Concerning rheumatologic diseases, wide experience has been acquired in systemic sclerosis, with long-term improvements in cutaneous disease being frequently reported, although visceral involvement remains unchanged at best. Autografting has proved to be barely effective in rheumatoid arthritis and quite toxic in juvenile idiopathic arthritis, whereas it leads to clinical remission and the reversal of visceral impairment in the majority of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. A promising indication is Crohn's disease, in which long-term endoscopic remission is frequently observed. Growing experience with autologous HCST in autoimmune diseases has progressively reduced concerns about transplant-related mortality and secondary myelodysplasia/leukemia. Therefore, a sustained complete remission seems to be within the reach of autografting in some autoimmune diseases; in others, the indications, risks and benefits of autografting need to be better defined. Consequently, the search for new drugs should also be encouraged.
    Expert Review of Hematology 12/2009; 2(6):699-715. · 2.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although multiple sclerosis (MS) affects both women and men, women are more susceptible to MS than men. Accumulating evidence indicates that the incidence and prevalence of MS is increasing, more so in women than in men. Owing to pregnancy, differing hormonal states and distinct social roles, the impact of MS differs between women and men. Since Patricia K Coyle published a review on gender issues in MS, multiple studies have added to the body of knowledge. This update will summarize the current thinking on gender-related issues in MS and we will address incidence and prevalence, hormonal factors, pregnancy and breastfeeding, genetics, course and prognosis, imaging, treatment and psychosocial aspects. Future progression within this field will help elucidate the cause of and define the treatment of MS.
    Women s Health 11/2010; 6(6):797-820.

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
40 Downloads
Available from
Jun 4, 2014