Article

Systematic review of cervical discography as a diagnostic test for chronic spinal pain.

Pain Management Center of Paducah, Paducah, KY 42003, USA.
Pain physician (Impact Factor: 4.77). 12(2):305-21.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Chronic neck pain represents a significant public health problem. Despite high prevalence rates, there is a lack of consensus regarding the causes or treatments for this condition. Based on controlled evaluations, the cervical intervertebral discs, facet joints, and atlantoaxial joints have all been implicated as pain generators. Cervical provocation discography, which includes disc stimulation and morphological evaluation, is often used to distinguish a painful disc from other potential sources of pain. Yet in the absence of validation and controlled outcome studies, the procedure remains mired in controversy.
A systematic review of the cervical discography literature.
To evaluate the validity and usefulness of cervical provocation discography in managing and diagnosing discogenic pain by means of a systematic review.
Following a comprehensive search of the literature, selected studies were subjected to a modified Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) diagnostic accuracy evaluation. Qualitative analysis was conducted using 5 levels of evidence, ranging from Level I to III with 3 subcategories in Level II. The rating scheme was modified to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy.
A systematic review of the literature demonstrated that cervical discography plays a significant role in selecting surgical candidates and improving outcomes, despite concerns regarding the false-positive rate, lack of standardization, and assorted potential confounding factors. Based on the studies utilizing the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) criteria, the data show a prevalence rate ranging between 16% and 20%. Based on the 3 studies that utilized IASP criteria during the performance of cervical discography, the evidence derived from studies evaluating the diagnostic validity of the procedure, the indicated level of evidence is Level II-2 based on modified U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria.
Limitations include a paucity of literature, poor methodologic quality, and very few studies performed utilizing IASP criteria.
Cervical discography performed according to the IASP criteria may be a useful tool for evaluating chronic cervical pain, without disc herniation or radiculitis. Based on a modified AHRQ accuracy evaluation and USPSTF level of evidence criteria, this systematic review indicates the strength of evidence as Level II-2 for diagnostic accuracy of cervical discography.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
101 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Study Design. Immunohistological analysis of the cervical dorsal root ganglia (DRG).Objective. To investigate immunohistologically in rats whether intradiscal administration of anti-nerve growth factor (NGF) antibody in injured cervical intervertebral discs (IVDs) suppresses pain-related peptide expression in DRG neurons.Summary of Background Data. Neck pain can involve the entire neck and become chronic and intractable. Cervical disc degeneration is a primary cause of neck pain, and pain-related mediators, such as NGF, have been correlated with discogenic pain.Methods. We examined Sprague-Dawley rats that received 10 punctures in the C5/6 IVD, and were treated with saline (puncture group) or an anti-NGF antibody (anti-NGF group). The retrograde neurotracer Fluoro-Gold (FG) was then injected into the C5/6 IVD. In addition, we examined a sham group that did not receive punctures (disc non-puncture). The C2-C7 DRG were harvested 1 week after surgery and immunostained for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a marker for peptide-containing neurons. We determined for each group the percentages of FG-labeled DRG neurons that were CGRP-immunoreactive (CGRP-ir).Results. FG-labeled neurons innervating the C5/6 IVD were found in all C2-C7 DRG examined. The percentage of FG-labeled CGRP-ir DRG neurons in the puncture group was significantly higher than that observed in the sham (p < 0.001) and anti-NGF groups (p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference between the sham and anti-NGF groups (p > 0.05). Therefore, intradiscal administration of anti-NGF antibody suppressed CGRP expression the cervical DRG.Conclusion. Neurons located in the C2-C7 DRG innervated the C5/6 IVD. These findings indicate that neck pain may be derived from degenerated IVDs. Furthermore, intradiscal administration of anti-NGF antibody suppressed CGRP expression in the cervical DRG innervating the injured IVD. Therefore, inhibiting NGF upregulation in the cervical IVD may be an efficient treatment for discogenic neck pain.
    Spine 04/2014; 39(13). DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000340 · 2.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Methylcobalamin (MeCbl), the activated form of vitamin B12, has been used to treat some nutritional diseases and other diseases in clinic, such as Alzheimer's disease and rheumatoid arthritis. As an auxiliary agent, it exerts neuronal protection by promoting regeneration of injured nerves and antagonizing glutamate-induced neurotoxicity. Recently several lines of evidence demonstrated that MeCbl may have potential analgesic effects in experimental and clinical studies. For example, MeCbl alleviated pain behaviors in diabetic neuropathy, low back pain and neuralgia. MeCbl improved nerve conduction, promoted the regeneration of injured nerves, and inhibited ectopic spontaneous discharges of injured primary sensory neurons. This review aims to summarize the analgesic effect and mechanisms of MeCbl at the present.
    Neural Plasticity 12/2013; 2013:424651. DOI:10.1155/2013/424651 · 3.60 Impact Factor
    This article is viewable in ResearchGate's enriched format
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The superiority of transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI) vs. interlaminar epidural steroid injections (ILESI) for treating unilateral lumbosacral radicular pain (LSRP) is unproven.
    Pain physician 07/2014; 17(4):E509-E524. · 4.77 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
19 Downloads
Available from
Oct 27, 2014