Article

Clinical predictors of the efficacy of a pulmonary rehabilitation programme in patients with COPD

Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Department, University of Pisa, Italy.
Respiratory medicine (Impact Factor: 2.92). 04/2009; 103(8):1224-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.01.023
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To identify predictors of success for an 8week pulmonary rehabilitation programme (PRP) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Sixty patients were stratified in subgroups according to baseline findings: airway obstruction (FEV(1) >/= or <50% pred), pulmonary hyperinflation (TLC > or <or=120% pred), BMI value (BMI > or <or=25), cardiovascular (CV) comorbidity, and resting PaO(2) (PaO(2) >/= or <60mmHg). Outcome measurements of PRP were: >54m increase in 6min walking test (6MWT), or >4points reduction in total score of S. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Logistic regression analysis was used.
After PRP there was a significant improvement in exercise tolerance and quality of life, which correlated with baseline FEV(1)/VC, PaO(2), SpO(2), 6MWT and SGRQ. SGRQ significantly decreased and 6MWT significantly increased after PRP in all subgroups, except for patients with CV comorbidities. Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that BMI>25 and resting PaO(2)<60mmHg were independent predictors of PRP efficacy in terms of improvement of 6MWT, but not of SGRQ scores.
Clinical and functional baseline findings do not predict the response to PRP in COPD. The greater efficacy in patients with BMI>25 or with PaO(2)<60mmHg may be due to a greater deconditioning in overweight patients, and to a larger room for improvement in hypoxemic patients.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Pierluigi Paggiaro, Jan 15, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
109 Views
  • Source
    • "However, whilst the benefits are well documented , not all individuals who meet these criteria are able to access pulmonary rehabilitation [4]. There is also considerable variation in individual program response with between 33% [5] and 53% [6] of participants gaining no meaningful improvement in six minute walk distance (6MWD) and over 50% [5] [6] of participants gaining no meaningful improvement in health-related quality of life. Therefore, a better understanding is required of which participant factors influence program response. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim was to determine if baseline measures can predict response to pulmonary rehabilitation in terms of six-minute walk distance (6MWD) or quality of life. Participants with COPD who attended pulmonary rehabilitation between 2010 and 2012 were recruited. Baseline measures evaluated included physical activity, quadriceps strength, comorbidities, inflammatory markers, and self-efficacy. Participants were classified as a responder with improvement in 6MWD (criteria of ≥25 m or ≥2SD) and Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ; ≥0.5 points/question). Eighty-five participants with a mean (SD) age of 67(9) years and a mean forced expiratory volume in one second of 55(22)% were studied. Forty-nine and 19 participants were responders when using the 6MWD criteria of ≥25 m and ≥61.9 m, respectively, with forty-four participants improving in CRQ. In a regression model, responders in 6MWD (≥25 m criteria) had lower baseline quadriceps strength (P = 0.028) and higher baseline self-efficacy scores (P = 0.045). Independent predictors of 6MWD response (≥61.9 m criteria) were participants with metabolic disease (P = 0.007) and lower baseline quadriceps strength (P = 0.016). Lower baseline CRQ was the only independent predictor of CRQ response. A participant with relatively lower baseline quadriceps strength was the strongest independent predictor of 6MWD response. Metabolic disease may predict 6MWD response, but predictors of CRQ response remain unclear.
    01/2014; 2014:782702. DOI:10.1155/2014/782702
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is beneficial for some, but not all, patients with chronic lung disease. To determine the success rate of a comprehensive PR program for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to characterize the differences between responders and nonresponders. A chart review was performed on patients with a clinical diagnosis of COPD who were referred for PR. Success was defined according to clinically important changes in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores and⁄or 6 min walk test distance. The majority of subjects were men (58%) with a mean (± SD) age of 69±10 years (n=177). Sixty-two per cent of participants had a successful outcome with PR, with proportionally more responders noting subjective improvement than objective improvement on a 6 min walk test (73% versus 51%). Subjects with poor baseline St George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores tended to improve the most (P=0.011 [ANOVA]). Successful participants had a greater forced expired volume in 1 s (1.1 L versus 0.9 L; P<0.05) and a lower BODE index (body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity index) at baseline (9.6 versus 10.3; P<0.05). Success of PR was not correlated with age, sex, chronic hypoxemic respiratory failure or other chronic conditions. Successful participants were more likely to be compliant and to experience fewer adverse events (P≤0.001). Our study reinforced the belief that the majority of participants with COPD benefit from PR. Few baseline characteristics were predictive of success. Subjectively measured improvement occurred more frequently than objectively measured improvement and was greatest in those with the poorest baseline values.
    Canadian respiratory journal: journal of the Canadian Thoracic Society 01/2010; 17(5):219-23. · 1.66 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In a population of chronic respiratory patients, a new subset with clinical complexity and with multiple coexisting organ failure and diseases is rapidly growing. Mainly due to the aging process, the associated frailty—not strictly related to the patient’s age—consists in a progressive and physiologic decline in multiple body systems leading to a substantial loss of functions and physiologic reserve. It is commonly acquainted that frailty, co-morbidities (several medical conditions associated) and disability (decline in physical functions) overlap each other: both frailty and co-morbidities can predict physical disability, whereas disability per se may exacerbate frailty and co-morbidities. As specific interventions (as rehabilitation) targeting at the physical activity, the old population have been shown to improve physical function and have a benefit along the full spectrum of health status. However, there is a substantial need for a multidimensional and personalized care approach: patient’s complexity, in fact, may play a role in determining the patient’s response to treatment. In particular, each disease as a single entity might reduce the response to treatment, depending on its effect on body functions and target therapies. Notwithstanding, the clinical complexity of these patients and the presence of several co-morbidities do not preclude per se the application and the effectiveness of a comprehensive rehabilitation program targeted to the individual’s needs.
    12/2011; 9(3). DOI:10.1007/s12682-011-0099-1
Show more