Article

Hemodynamic characterization of the Sorin Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis at rest and exercise.

Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Center Munich, Munich, Germany.
The Journal of heart valve disease (Impact Factor: 0.73). 02/2009; 18(1):95-100.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although the long-term clinical outcome after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the Sorin Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis has been well described, few data are available with regards to hemodynamic performance. On the basis of its specialized design, with the pericardium mounted on the outside of the stent, the Mitroflow valve is considered to provide optimal opening and orifice areas.
Between February 2006 and April 2007, a total of 127 patients (66 females, 61 males; mean age 77.6 +/- 5.2 years) underwent AVR with the Mitroflow valve at the authors' institution. Echocardiography was performed at discharge in 91 patients, while a six-month follow up examination was conducted in 78 (including ergometer hemodynamics in 25 cases).
The mean systolic pressure gradient (MPG) ranged from 19.7 +/- 3.3 mmHg (size 19 valve) to 12.4 +/- 2.4 mmHg (size 27 valve), and the mean effective orifice area (EOA) from 0.96 +/- 0.0 cm2 (size 19 valve) to 2.36 +/- 0.4 cm2 (size 27 valve). The incidence of mild-to-moderate and severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) was 33% and 10% at the six-month follow up. During exercise (25 W-100 W), the MPG increased from 17.1 +/- 3.6 mmHg to 23.6 mmHg in valve sizes 19 to 21, and from 12.2 +/- 3.6 mmHg to 15.9 +/- 2.5 mmHg in valve sizes 23 to 27. The effective orifice fraction (EOF = EOA/annulus area) was 38 +/- 7%.
The Mitroflow valve exhibits an adequate MPG and EOA, as might be expected for a pericardial bioprosthesis. Of note, the gradient increase during exercise was low, especially for the larger valve sizes. Due to its special design, the Mitroflow prosthesis shows a large opening, as demonstrated by the high EOF. These data relating to the EOA of all prosthesis sizes may help surgeons to select the minimum prosthesis size in order to prevent PPM.

0 Followers
 · 
186 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: A multicentre experience with the Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis has been evaluated longitudinally over a 20-year period. METHODS: From 1988 through 2008, 1591 patients (mean age, 75.3±6.8 years, and 60.1% female) from 12 centres had a Mitroflow in the aortic position. Concomitant coronary artery bypass was performed in 41.9% (n=666) of patients, urgency/emergency surgery in 9.5% (n=152) and replacement of degenerated prosthesis in 2.3% (n=36). Follow-up (7.447 patient-years) was 99.2% complete. Median follow-up was 61.9 months (interquartile range (IQR) 30.8-90.9 months). The study was carried out following American Association for Thoracic Surgery/Society for Thoracic Surgeons/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (AATS/STS/EACTS) Guidelines for reporting valve morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: The early (30-day) mortality was 6.5% (n=104). Actuarial survival rates at 10, 15 and 18 years were 53%, 34% and 27%, respectively (2.2 patient/year). Re-operation was required in 96 patients (5.9%), of whom 59 patients (3.7%) for structural valve degeneration. Actuarial freedom from prosthetic valve degeneration at 18 years was 65.5% (78% in patients>70 years) with a linearised rate of 1.4 patient/year (0.8 patient/year in patients>70 years). At 18 years, freedom from embolism was 82% (0.9 patient/year), freedom from valve endocarditis was 89% (0.6 patient/year) and freedom from bleeding episodes was 95% (0.2 patient/year), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This independent multicentre study indicates that the Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis provides favourable long-term postoperative results with a low rate of valve-related events and need of re-intervention, particularly in patients older than 70 years.
    European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 01/2011; 39(1). DOI:10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.03.069 · 2.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Heated debates revolve around the hemodynamic performance of stented aortic tissue valves. Because the opening area strongly influences the generation of a pressure gradient over the prosthesis, and the outer diameter determines which valve actually fits into the aortic root, it would seem logical that the valve with the greatest opening area in relation to its outer diameter should allow the best hemodynamic performance. Interestingly, neither of these 2 parameters is reflected by the manufacturing companies' size labels or suggested sizing strategies. In addition, it is known that valves with the same size label from different companies may differ significantly in their actual dimension (outer diameter). Finally, the manufacturer-suggested sizing strategies differ so much that expected differences from valve design may get lost because of differences in sizing. These size and sizing differences and the lack of information on the geometric opening area complicate true hemodynamic comparisons significantly. Furthermore, some fluid dynamic considerations regarding the determination of opening area by echocardiography (the effective orifice area) introduce additional obscuring factors in the attempt to compare hemodynamic performance data of different stented tissue valves. We analyzed the true dimensions of different tissue prostheses and the manufacturer-suggested sizing strategies in relation to published effective orifice areas. We have demonstrated how sizing and implantation strategy have much greater impact on postoperative valve hemodynamics than valve brand or type. In addition, our findings may explain the different opinions regarding valve hemodynamics of different tissue valves.
    The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 06/2011; 142(5):1180-7. DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.05.007 · 3.99 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since blood flow impairment by aortic valve prosthesis is characteristically dynamic, this dynamic component is best and thoroughly appreciated by exercise Doppler echocardiography. We sought to determine the haemodynamics of a new pericardial aortic bioprosthesis (Trifecta™, St Jude Medical, MN, USA; T-AVB) at rest and during exercise and a 10-min recovery period in comparison with alternative aortic valve prostheses, e.g. Ross operation (RO), stentless aortic valve (Medtronic Freestyle prosthesis, MF-AVB) and a healthy control group (CO). Haemodynamics at rest and during supine exercise stress testing and a 10-min recovery period were evaluated in 32 patients (mean age: 70.8 ± 6.7 years) with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (T-AVR) (mean follow-up: 5 ± 2 months), 49 with RO (mean age: 43.5 ± 13.7 years), 39 with an MF-AVB (mean age: 64.6 ± 9.4 years) and 26 healthy patients (mean age: 39 ± 9 years). Measurements included mean outflow tract gradient (δpmean, mmHg), effective orifice area index (EOAI, cm(2)/m(2)) and valvular resistance (vR, dyn s cm(-5)). Mean body surface area for T-AVB was 1.93 ± 0.24 m(2) (median 1.97 m(2)). Mean δpmean at rest was 7.2 ± 3.4 mmHg, mean EOAI 0.86 ± 0.23 cm(2)/m(2) and mean vR 50.7 ± 23.2 dyn s cm(-5). Supine stress testing did increase the mean EOAI to 0.98 ± 0.27 cm(2)/m(2), the mean vR to 62.6 ± 25.3 dyn s cm(-5) and the mean δpmean to 10.21 ± 4.7 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). During the post-exercise recovery period, δpmean, EOAI and vR showed a prompt normalization within 5 min of cessation of exercise. At all the three measurement points, T-AVR and MF-AVB revealed low gradients, satisfactory EOAI and low vR. Compared with the RO and a healthy control group, both groups showed significantly inferior performance throughout the exercise and post-exercise study protocol (P < 0.05). In comparison with T-AVB, patients with an MF-AVB only showed significant inferior performance throughout series with respect to a higher vR, indicating a smaller increase in the EOAI during exercise. During the 10-min post-exercise period, T-AVB recovered significantly earlier than MF-AVB. When comparing two different types of aortic valve bioprostheses with a gold standard group (RO) and a healthy population, both aortic valve bioprostheses perform inferior but reveal promising haemodynamics during exercise. During post-exercise haemodynamic recovery, only the T-AVB revealed a nearly physiological recovery pattern compared with the RO and a healthy control group.
    European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery: official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery 07/2013; 44(4). DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezt367 · 2.81 Impact Factor