Intralipid Infusion Diminishes Return of Spontaneous Circulation After Hypoxic Cardiac Arrest in Rabbits
ABSTRACT Infusion of lipid emulsion has been shown to reverse lipophilic drug-induced cardiovascular collapse in laboratory models and humans. The effect of high dose lipid in nondrug-induced cardiac arrest is, however, uncertain. In a rabbit model of asphyxial pulseless electrical activity (PEA) we compared lipid augmented with standard advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) resuscitation.
Adult New Zealand White rabbits underwent hypoxic PEA via tracheal clamping. After 2 min of cardiac arrest, basic life support cardiopulmonary resuscitation was commenced and 3 mL/kg 20% Intralipid or 3 mL/kg 0.9% saline solution infused. Adrenaline (100 microg/kg) was administered at 4 and 5 min. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), hemodynamic metrics, and survival to 50 min were recorded.
Seven of 11 saline-treated rabbits developed ROSC versus 1 of 12 Intralipid-treated animals; P = 0.009. No significant difference in survival to 50 min was observed (3/11 saline vs 0/12 Intralipid; P = 0.211).
In this model of hypoxia-induced PEA, standard ACLS resulted in greater coronary perfusion pressure and increased ROSC compared with ACLS plus lipid infusion. Lipid emulsion may be contraindicated in cardiac arrest complicated by significant hypoxia.
SourceAvailable from: Michael Fettiplace[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Cooling following cardiac arrest can improve survival significantly. However, delays in achieving target temperature may decrease the overall benefits of cooling. Here, we test whether lipid emulsion, a clinically approved drug reported to exert cardioprotection, can rescue heart contractility in the setting of delayed cooling in stunned mouse cardiomyocytes.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A toxic dose of desipramine (tricyclic antidepressant) causes cardiac arrhythmias and ultimately asystole. Resuscitation is difficult and almost always unsuccessful. Anecdotal evidence suggests that an infusion of lipid emulsion may be an effective treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal combination of lipid rescue and traditional Advanced Cardiac Life Support therapy for the treatment of desipramine overdose. We use a prospective, experimental, between subjects design with a swine model investigating the effectiveness of the drugs and drug combinations administered with cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 8 cardiopulmonary resuscitation/drug combination interventions, and the results from each group were compared using an analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey where appropriate. The groups that received vasopressin were more likely to survive than those that did not receive vasopressin, and the groups that received lipid emulsion were more likely to survive than those that did not receive lipid emulsion. Vasopressin alone was shown to be the most effective treatment in the management of desipramine overdose. The results of this study may warrant changes in treatment protocols for desipramine overdose.Military medicine 11/2014; 179(11):1266-72. DOI:10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00050 · 0.77 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Intravenous lipid emulsion is an accepted therapy for the treatment of severe cardiac toxic effects caused by local anesthetics. Lipid emulsion therapy has also been used successfully to treat cardiac arrest and intractable arrhythmias caused by overdoses of antiepileptic drugs, cardiovascular drugs, and psychotropic medications, but experience with intravenous lipids as antidotal therapy in these clinical situations is limited. However, intravenous lipids are relatively safe, widely available, and easy to administer, and many published case reports document their dramatic effectiveness. Patients who have not responded to standard therapies have been quickly revived by administration of intravenous lipids. Use of lipids most likely will increase, and critical care nurses should be familiar with lipid therapy.Critical Care Nurse 10/2014; 34(5):62-6. DOI:10.4037/ccn2014755 · 1.07 Impact Factor