Assessing tumor hypoxia by positron emission tomography with Cu-ATSM.

Radiochemistry Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging: official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of... (Impact Factor: 1.72). 07/2009; 53(2):193-200.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT For the last several decades, hypoxia has been recognized to be one of the key factors in tumor aggression and an important impediment to local and distant control of malignant tumors. In addition, hypoxia is a major cause of failure of both radiation therapy and chemotherapy. It has been shown that hypoxia is an independent negative prognostic factor for patient outcome in various solid tumors. Clinical studies using polarographic oxygen electrodes, as a tool for measuring hypoxia, were the first to demonstrate the presence of hypoxia in human tumors and its association with poor prognosis. However, this method is invasive and has technical limitations that prevent its routine clinical use. Over the years, imaging as a noninvasive method has attracted a lot of attention and several radiotracers have been developed for noninvasive evaluation of hypoxia. One of the most promising radiotracers is the copper(II) complex of diacetyl-2,3-bis(N(4)-methyl-3-thiosemicarbazonato) ligand (Cu-ATSM) for imaging with positron emission tomography. In this review, the preclinical evaluation of Cu-ATSM as well as its clinical value in several solid tumors will be discussed.


Available from: Jason P Holland, Jun 13, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The innovation of computational techniques serves as an important step toward optimized, patient-specific management of cancer. In particular, in silico simulation of tumour growth and treatment response may eventually yield accurate information on disease progression, enhance the quality of cancer treatment, and explain why certain therapies are effective where others are not. In silico modelling is demonstrated to considerably benefit from information obtainable with PET and PET/CT. In particular, models have successfully integrated tumour glucose metabolism, cell proliferation, and cell oxygenation from multiple tracers in order to simulate tumour behaviour. With the development of novel radiotracers to image additional tumour phenomena, such as pH and gene expression, the value of PET and PET/CT data for use in tumour models will continue to grow. In this work, the use of PET and PET/CT information in in silico tumour models is reviewed. The various parameters that can be obtained using PET and PET/CT are detailed, as well as the radiotracers that may be used for this purpose, their utility, and limitations. The biophysical measures used to quantify PET and PET/CT data are also described. Finally, a list of in silico models that incorporate PET and/or PET/CT data is provided and reviewed.
    Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 11/2014; 2015. DOI:10.1155/2015/415923 · 1.02 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Imaging of hypoxia is important in many diseases states in oncology, cardiology, and neurology. The radiopharmaceutical, copper-labeled diacetyl-bis(N-methylthiosemicarbazone), has been used to assess hypoxia in many studies. In particular, copper-labeled diacetyl-bis(N-methylthiosemicarbazone) has been used in oncologic settings to investigate tumor hypoxia and the role of this parameter in response to therapy and outcome. Some groups have conducted imaging studies assessing the role of hypoxia in cardiovascular and neurologic disorders. Additionally, several groups have made significant progress into understanding the mechanism by which this compound accumulates in cells. Multiple preclinical and clinical studies have been conducted, shedding light on the importance of careful image analysis when using this tracer. This review article focuses on the recent preclinical and clinical studies with this tracer. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 03/2015; 45(2). DOI:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2014.10.003 · 3.13 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to compare (64)Cu-diacetyl-bis(N(4)-methylsemicarbazone) ((64)Cu-ATSM) and (18)FDG PET uptake characteristics and (64)Cu-ATSM autoradiography to pimonidazole immunohistochemistry in spontaneous canine sarcomas and carcinomas. Biopsies were collected from individual tumors between approximately 3 and 25 hours after the intravenous injection of (64)Cu-ATSM and pimonidazole. (64)Cu-ATSM autoradiography and pimonidazole immunostaining was performed on sectioned biopsies. Acquired (64)Cu-ATSM autoradiography and pimonidazole images were rescaled, aligned and their distribution patterns compared. (64)Cu-ATSM and (18)FDG PET/CT scans were performed in a concurrent study and uptake characteristics were obtained for tumors where available. Maximum pimonidazole pixel value and mean pimonidazole labeled fraction was found to be strongly correlated to (18)FDG PET uptake levels, whereas more varying results were obtained for the comparison to (64)Cu-ATSM. In the case of the latter, uptake at scans performed 3 h post injection (pi) generally showed strong positive correlated to pimonidazole uptake.Comparison of distribution patterns of pimonidazole immunohistochemistry and (64)Cu-ATSM autoradiography yielded varying results. Significant positive correlations were mainly found in sections displaying a heterogeneous distribution of tracers. Tumors with high levels of pimonidazole staining generally displayed high uptake of (18)FDG and (64)Cu-ATSM (3 h pi.). Similar regional distribution of (64)Cu-ATSM and pimonidazole was observed in most heterogeneous tumor regions. However, tumor and hypoxia level dependent differences may exist with regard to the hypoxia specificity of (64)Cu-ATSM in canine tumors.
    Radiation Oncology 06/2012; 7:89. DOI:10.1186/1748-717X-7-89 · 2.36 Impact Factor