Pressure ulcer preventive device use among elderly patients early in the hospital stay.

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, 660 West Redwood Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Nursing research (Impact Factor: 1.5). 01/2009; 58(2):95-104. DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31818fce8e
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Clinical guidelines for the prevention of pressure ulcers advise that pressure-reducing devices should be used for all patients at risk of or with pressure ulcers and that all pressure ulcers should be documented in the patient record. Adherence to these guidelines among elderly hospital patients early in the hospital stay has not been examined in prior studies.
The objective of this study was to examine adherence to guidelines by determining the frequency and correlates of use of preventive devices early in the hospital stay of elderly patients and by determining the frequency and correlates of recording pressure ulcers in the patient record.
This was a cross-sectional study of 792 patients aged 65 years or older admitted through the emergency department to the inpatient medical service at two teaching hospitals in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, between 1998 and 2001. Patients were examined by a research nurse on Hospital Day 3 (median of 48 hours after admission) to determine the use of preventive devices, presence of pressure ulcers, and risk of pressure ulcers (by Norton scale). Data on additional risk factors were obtained from the admission nursing assessment in the patient record. Data on documentation of pressure ulcers were obtained by chart abstraction.
Only 15% of patients had any preventive devices in use at the time of the examination. Among patients considered at risk of pressure ulcers (Norton score < or =14), only 51% had a preventive device. In multivariable analyses, high risk of pressure ulcers was associated with use of preventive devices (odds ratio = 41.8, 95% confidence interval = 14.0-124.6), whereas the type and stage of pressure ulcer were not. Documentation of a pressure ulcer was present for only 68% of patients who had a pressure ulcer according to the research examination.
Use of preventive devices and documentation of pressure ulcers are suboptimal even among patients at high risk.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nurses Improving Care of Healthsystem Elders (NICHE) provides hospitals with tools and resources to implement an initiative to improve health outcomes in older adults and their families. Beginning in 2011, members have engaged in a process of program self-evaluation, designed to evaluate internal progress toward developing, sustaining, and disseminating NICHE. This manuscript describes the NICHE Site Self-evaluation and reports the inaugural self-evaluation data in 180 North American hospitals. NICHE members evaluate their program utilizing the following dimensions of a geriatric acute care program: guiding principles, organizational structures, leadership, geriatric staff competence, interdisciplinary resources and processes, patient- and family-centered approaches, environment of care, and quality metrics. The majority of NICHE sites were at the progressive implementation level (n = 100, 55.6%), having implemented interdisciplinary geriatric education and the geriatric resource nurse (GRN) model on at least one unit; 29% have implemented the GRN model on multiple units, including specialty areas. Bed size, teaching status, and Magnet status were not associated with level of implementation, suggesting that NICHE implementation can be successful in a variety of settings and communities.
    Nursing and Health Sciences 05/2013; · 0.85 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Electronic health information systems can increase the ability of health-care organizations to investigate the effects of clinical interventions. The authors present an organizing framework that integrates outcomes and informatics research paradigms to guide knowledge discovery in electronic clinical databases. They illustrate its application using the example of hospital acquired pressure ulcers (HAPU). The Knowledge Discovery through Informatics for Comparative Effectiveness Research (KDI-CER) framework was conceived as a heuristic to conceptualize study designs and address potential methodological limitations imposed by using a single research perspective. Advances in informatics research can play a complementary role in advancing the field of outcomes research including CER. The KDI-CER framework can be used to facilitate knowledge discovery from routinely collected electronic clinical data. French Les systèmes d'information électroniques sur la santé peuvent accroître la capacité des organismes de soins de santé à étudier les effets des interventions cliniques. Le présent article propose un cadre organisationnel qui intègre les paradigmes de la recherche en informatique et de la recherche sur les résultats afin de faciliter la création de connaissances à l'aide de bases de données cliniques. Afin d'illustrer le cadre proposé, les auteurs l'appliquent à l'exemple des plaies de pression. Ce cadre de création de connaissances à l'aide de l'informatique aux fins de la recherche comparative sur l'efficacité des traitements (CCI-RCET) a été conçu dans le but de servir d'outil heuristique pour la conceptualisation des modèles d'étude et de surmonter les contraintes méthodologiques que peut éventuellement imposer toute perspective de recherche unique. Les percées de la recherche en informatique appliquée peuvent jouer un rôle complémentaire dans le développement du champ de la recherche sur les résultats, y compris de la recherche comparative sur l'efficacité des traitements. Le cadre de CCI-RCET peut être utilisé afin de favoriser la production de connaissances à partir des données cliniques électroniques qui sont recueillies de façon systématique.
    The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmières 03/2013; 45(1).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To enhance the learner's competence with information geared toward improving processes to capture present-on-admission pressure ulcers. This continuing education activity is intended for physicians and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. After participating in this educational activity, the participant should be better able to:1. Analyze the research study presented and its effects regarding identification of present-on-admission pressure ulcers (PrUs) and reduction of healthcare-acquired conditions.2. Identify implications of proper admission skin assessment and documentation on reimbursement by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.3. Implement recommendations from the research study for ways to improve PrU documentation on admission assessment. OBJECTIVE:This study was designed to determine if a process could be built to accurately capture present-on-admission (POA) pressure ulcers (PrUs). Will a formalized electronic process designed to identify, communicate, and document assessment findings of POA PrUs from clinical nurses to admitting physicians reduce missed identification of POA PrUs, improve communication processes, improve physicians' documentation, and improve reimbursement for the hospital?DESIGN: A before-and-after study design in a single site over a 4-month period compared with the same period during the previous 2 years.SETTING: An acute-care, 333-bed hospital in the Midwestern United States.Nurses were the primary study population.INTERVENTION: The wound assessment screen in the electronic medical record (EMR) was revised to include a new prompt for POA documentation and communication to the admitting physician of the assessment findings.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An increase in POA PrU reporting and reduction in hospital-acquired condition (HAC) reported PrUs.RESULTS: A statistically significant change (2010: P < .01, z = 2.507; 2011: P < .01, z = 2.632) was found for POA; HAC also had a statistically significant change (2010: P = .02, z = 2.411; 2011: P < .01, z = 2.781).CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the electronic prompt did not contribute to the improvement in the POA and HAC rates because the reduction occurred before the EMR prompt intervention. Changing processes such as EMR upgrades, shared governance, Magnet journey, participation in the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators, and unit-based nursing councils and skin care champions may have exerted positive forces and contributed to improvement in the communication process between the admitting physicians and the clinical nurses.
    Advances in skin & wound care 12/2013; 26(12):566-572.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 20, 2014