Recommendations for the reporting of surgically resected specimens of renal cell carcinoma The Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology

Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94025, USA.
Human pathology (Impact Factor: 2.81). 05/2009; 40(4):456-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2008.12.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A checklist based approach to reporting the relevant pathologic details of renal cell carcinoma resection specimens improves the completeness of the report. Karyotypic evaluation of renal neoplasms has refined but also complicated their classification. The number of diagnostic possibilities has increased and the importance of distinguishing different tumor types has been underscored by dramatic variation in prognosis and the development of targeted therapies for specific subtypes. The increasing number of recognized renal neoplasms has implications for handling renal resection specimens. Furthermore, the prognostic significance of other features of renal neoplasms related to grade and stage has been demonstrated. This guideline for the handling of renal resection specimens will focus on problem areas in the evolving practice of diagnosis, grading, and staging of renal neoplasms. The accompanying checklist will serve to ensure that all necessary details of the renal resection specimen are included in the surgical pathology report.


Available from: James D Brooks, Jun 14, 2015
1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fuhrman grading of renal cell carcinoma focuses on features of nuclear size, nuclear shape, and nucleolar prominence. Despite the reported widespread usage of Fuhrman grading in clinical studies, there is debate as to the prognostic significance and reproducibility of its criteria. It has been noted that many pathologists rely on assessment of nucleolar prominence alone when grading renal cell carcinoma; however, the validity of this remains unconfirmed. This study was undertaken to determine the relationship of the 3 morphologic components of the Fuhrman grading system with one another and to determine which, if any of these, can be correlated with outcome for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. One hundred twenty-one organ-confined clear cell renal cell carcinomas were examined in this study. Parameters of nuclear size (area, major axis, perimeter) and nuclear shape (shape factor, nuclear compactness) were assessed by image analysis, whereas nucleolar prominence was assigned (grades 1 to 3) using the criteria of Fuhrman. On the basis of the predominant grade present, there were 17 nucleolar grade 1, 90 nucleolar grade 2, and 14 nucleolar grade 3 tumors. When the high-power field in each tumor with the worst nucleolar grade was assessed, there was 1 nucleolar grade 1, 68 nucleolar grade 2, and 52 nucleolar grade 3 tumors. Predominant and worst nucleolar grade correlated with all measures of nuclear size, but not nuclear shape. Worst nucleolar grade and all parameters of nuclear size were significantly associated with outcome. On multivariate analysis, worst nucleolar grade retained a significant association with survival when modeled with nuclear area. Neither worst nucleolar grade nor major nuclear axis/nuclear perimeter was significantly associated with survival when modeled together. In this study, we have shown that worst nucleolar grade and nuclear size are of prognostic significance for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. We have further shown the association of worst nucleolar grade with outcome to be independent of nuclear area, whereas it is a dependent variable when tested against other parameters of nuclear size. These findings indicate that worst nucleolar grading alone is a valid grading parameter for clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
    The American journal of surgical pathology 06/2011; 35(8):1134-9. DOI:10.1097/PAS.0b013e318220697f · 4.59 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To collect information on current practices of European pathologists for the handling and reporting of nephrectomy specimens with renal tumours. A questionnaire was circulated to the members of the European Network of Uropathology, which consists of 343 pathologists in 15 European countries. Replies were received from 48% of members. These replies indicated that nephrectomy specimens are most often received in formalin. Lymph nodes are found in less than 5% of nephrectomy specimens. All respondents give an objective measure of tumour size, most commonly in three diameters. The most common method to search for capsule penetration is to slice tissue outside the tumour perpendicularly into the tumour. The most common sampling algorithm from tumours greater than 2 cm is one section for every centimetre of maximum tumour diameter. Most respondents use the 2004 WHO renal tumour classification although only slightly over half consider small papillary tumours malignant if the diameter is greater than 5 mm. The Fuhrman grading system is widely used. Almost all use immunohistochemistry for histological typing in some cases, while only 7% always use it. The most utilised special stains are CK7 (95%), CD10 (93%), vimentin (86%), HMB45 (68%), c-kit (61%) and Hale's colloidal iron (52%). Only 18% use other ancillary techniques for diagnosis in difficult cases. While most pathologists appear to follow published guidelines for reporting renal carcinoma, there is still a need for the development of consensus and further standardisation of practice for contentious areas of specimen handling and reporting.
    Journal of clinical pathology 09/2011; 65(2):106-13. DOI:10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200339 · 2.55 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lymph node (LN) status is essential in staging both renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and pelvic urothelial carcinoma (PUC). The rate of regional LN involvement is influenced by pathologic tumor stage, extent of the surgical resection, and accuracy of pathologic gross examination. In this study, we assess the presence of hilar LNs in radical nephrectomies (RN) by entirely submitting the hilar fat region (HFR) for microscopic evaluation (ME). Fifty consecutive RNs from 2006 to 2008 were evaluated by a standard gross examination protocol (SGEP) which consisted of palpation and sectioning of the HFR with submission of grossly identified LNs. Subsequently, the entire HFR was re-evaluated and submitted as study's total submission protocol (TSP). The number and disease status of hilar LNs identified by the SGEP and TSP were compared. Fifty RNs (37 clear cell RCC, 6 papillary RCC, 7 PUC) were studied prospectively. Ten of the 50 RNs had LNs identified (20%) with both protocols. Four of the 50 RNs had nodal metastases (8%) with the LN sizes ranging between 1.3 and 2.5 cm (mean 1.8 cm). All nodal metastases were identified by the SGEP. In three RNs (6%), additional minute (mean 0.12 cm) negative LNs not seen by the SGEP were identified by the TSP. LNs are present in only 20% of RNs, even after complete ME of the HFR. The SGEP for identifying hilar LNs in RNs is sufficient for staging and did not lead to underreporting of LN metastases.
    Pathology - Research and Practice 02/2010; 206(5):310-3. DOI:10.1016/j.prp.2010.02.002 · 1.56 Impact Factor