Evaluating Partnerships to Prevent and Manage Chronic Disease

Coalitions Work, 1109 Moore House Rd, Yorktown, VA 23690, USA.
Preventing chronic disease (Impact Factor: 2.12). 05/2009; 6(2):A64.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To be effective and sustain themselves over time, public-private partnerships must make evaluation a priority. Specifically, partnerships should evaluate 1) their infrastructure, function, and processes; 2) programs designed to achieve their mission, goals, and objectives; and 3) changes in health and social status, organizations, systems, and the broader community. This article describes how to 1) develop a comprehensive evaluation strategy based on partnership theory; 2) select short-term, intermediate, and long-term indicators to measure outcomes; 3) choose appropriate methods and tools; and 4) use evaluation results to provide accountability to stakeholders and improve partnership function and program implementation.

Download full-text


Available from: Frances Dunn Butterfoss, Apr 14, 2014
7 Reads
  • Source
    • "We used results from our prestudy and relevant literature (16–20) as a guide to develop a themes and topics list for the interviews (Table). The evaluation framework of Butterfoss (16), with its subsequent indicators, provided useful input for our list. This evaluation framework describes 3 levels for evaluating a PPP. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A public-private partnership (PPP) is an essential component of the Dutch community-based approach toward overweight prevention, Youth on Healthy Weight (JOGG). Beginning in 2010, 25 Dutch municipalities have implemented JOGG, but little is known about determinants of successful partnerships. This study aims to identify these determinants to guide other municipalities or communities in creating successful partnerships. Semistructured interviews were held in Veghel, a town in the southeast of the Netherlands, with private (n = 7) and public (n = 5) partners from the PPP involved in JOGG. We developed a themes and topics list that fit the purpose of our study. The interviews focused on the formation, functioning, and output of the partnership. Recruitment of partners was facilitated by using preexisting networks. Corporate social responsibility, belief in the JOGG approach, importance of the health issue, and strengthened contacts with other partners were important motivations for partners to participate. In addition to partnership functioning and output, enthusiastic and decisive management, shared commitment, joint responsibility, and effective internal communication were important to the partners, as were clear goals and concrete actions to achieve these goals. To create successful partnerships, the program and its goals should appeal to the motivations of the partners. Involving partners in defining local program objectives can help to create shared commitment and joint responsibility. Further evaluation of partnerships' impact on achieving program goals is a subsequent step to be taken to identify long-term determinants of successful PPPs.
    Preventing chronic disease 07/2013; 10:E117. DOI:10.5888/pcd10.120317 · 2.12 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Process evaluation also includes assessment of more pragmatic issues such as turnover rate of board members, success in recruiting members with specific skills or connections to influential leaders, members' perceptions of the benefits and costs of participation, and the degree to which members perceive the partnership to be effective and sustainable over time (45,47). Evaluations that address partnership priorities increase the likelihood that partnership collaboration continues, thus promoting sustainability (19,43). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is a paradigm to study and reduce disparities in health outcomes related to chronic disease. Community advisory boards (CABs) commonly formalize the academic-community partnerships that guide CBPR by providing a mechanism for community members to have representation in research activities. Researchers and funding agencies increasingly recognize the value of the community's contribution to research and acknowledge that community advisory boards are a key component of successful CBPR projects. In this article, we describe the best processes for forming, operating, and maintaining CABs for CBPR. We synthesize the literature and offer our professional experiences to guide formation, operation, and maintenance of CABs.
    Preventing chronic disease 05/2011; 8(3):A70. · 2.12 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Preventing chronic disease 05/2009; 6(2):A39. · 2.12 Impact Factor
Show more