Article

Neighborhood retail food environment and fruit and vegetable intake in a multiethnic urban population.

Department of Public Health, Mental Health, and Administrative Nursing, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
American journal of health promotion: AJHP (Impact Factor: 2.37). 03/2009; 23(4):255-64. DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.071204127
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To examine relationships between the neighborhood food environment and fruit and vegetable intake in a multiethnic urban population.
Analysis of cross-sectional survey and observational data.
One hundred forty-six neighborhoods within three large geographic communities of Detroit, Michigan.
Probability sample of 919 African-American, Latino, and white adults.
The dependent variable was mean daily fruit and vegetable servings, as measured by using a modified Block 98 food frequency questionnaire. Independent variables included the neighborhood food environment: store availability (i.e., large grocery, specialty, convenience, liquor, small grocery), supermarket proximity (i.e., street-network distance to nearest chain grocer), and perceived and observed neighborhood fresh fruit and vegetable supply (i.e., availability, variety, quality, affordability).
Weighted, multilevel regression.
Presence of a large grocery store in the neighborhood was associated with, on average, 0.69 more daily fruit and vegetable servings in the full sample. Relationships between the food environment and fruit and vegetable intake did not differ between whites and African-Americans. However, Latinos, compared with African-Americans, who had a large grocery store in the neighborhood consumed 2.20 more daily servings of fruits and vegetables. Presence of a convenience store in the neighborhood was associated with 1.84 fewer daily fruit and vegetable servings among Latinos than among African-Americans.
The neighborhood food environment influences fruit and vegetable intake, and the size of this relationship may vary for different racial/ethnic subpopulations.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
97 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The consumption of fruit is generally associated with better health, but also higher socioeconomic status (SES). Most previous studies evaluating consumption of fruits have not separated 100% fruit juice and whole fruit, which may conceal interesting patterns in consumption. To estimate demographic and socioeconomic correlates of whole fruit versus 100% juice consumption among children and adults in the United States. Secondary analyses of two cycles of the nationally representative National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2007-2010, by gender, age group, race/ethnicity and SES among 16,628 children and adults. Total fruit consumption (population average of 1.06 cup equivalents/d) fell far short of national goals. Overall, whole fruit provided about 65% of total fruit, while 100% juice provided the remainder. Whereas 100% juice consumption was highest among children and declined sharply with age, whole fruit consumption was highest among older adults. Total fruit and whole fruit consumption was generally higher among those with higher incomes or more education. By contrast, the highest 100% juice consumption was found among children, racial/ethnic minorities and lower-income groups. Consumption patterns for whole fruit versus 100% fruit juice showed different gradients by race/ethnicity, education, and income. The advice to replace 100% juice with whole fruit may pose a challenge for the economically disadvantaged and some minority groups, whose fruit consumption falls short of national goals.
    Nutrition journal. 01/2015; 14(1):3.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Exposure to physical and policy environments that limit availability, affordability and appeal of healthy eating and active living options is higher for U.S. blacks than whites. This may contribute to high risk of obesity in black communities and limit effectiveness of preventive interventions. Here, we assess applicability to black Americans of findings from a prior evidence review system designed to accelerate the discovery and application of policy and environmental strategies for childhood obesity prevention and assess external validity. The database included 600 peer-reviewed articles reporting data from 396 sets of studies (study groupings) published from January 2000 through May 2009 and pertained to 24 types of policy and environmental strategies. Only 33 study groupings (∼8%) included ≥50% black Americans or reported subgroup analyses. Of 10 evaluation studies for interventions rated as effective for all populations in the primary review, 8 suggested effectiveness of child-focused interventions in school or child care settings for obesity- or physical activity-related outcomes in black Americans. Overall findings highlight the need for rigorous evaluations of interventions that reach black children in community or institutional settings, and conceptual frameworks and research designs geared to identifying ethnic or ethnicity–income group differences in intervention effects.
    Obesity Reviews 10/2014; 15(S4). · 7.86 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neighborhood food environments have long been thought to play an important role in explaining differentials in dietary intake levels among disadvantaged populations. Yet, many studies have neglected whether or not respondents actually utilize their local food environment. This study utilizes household survey data, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and a negative binomial regression framework to examine the relationship between neighborhood food environments, diet, and shopping behavior among socially and economically marginalized residents living in the lower eastside neighborhoods of Detroit, Michigan. The results provide support for a more nuanced understanding of the role that neighborhood food environments play in shaping consumption. While the number of fast food establishments negatively impacts dietary intake levels regardless of scale and travel patterns, spatial proximity to supermarkets impact wanes as distances increase and shopping behaviors are incorporated. Sociodemographics continue to play a vital role in explaining consumption patterns. Such findings are a direct result of the additional burdens placed on marginalized households to navigate the built-environment in search of affordable, nutritious food staples.
    Applied Geography 12/2014; 55:9–18. · 3.08 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
0 Downloads
Available from