Article

HIV Incidence Among Men With and Those Without Sexually Transmitted Rectal Infections: Estimates From Matching Against an HIV Case Registry

New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Bureau of Sexually Transmitted Disease Control, New York, NY.
Clinical Infectious Diseases (Impact Factor: 9.42). 06/2013; 57(8). DOI: 10.1093/cid/cit437
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Background. Sexually transmitted bacterial rectal infections are objective markers of HIV risk behavior. Quantifying HIV risk among men who have sex with men (MSM) who have had these infections can inform prevention efforts. We measured HIV risk among MSM who have and have not been diagnosed with rectal Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and/or rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC). Methods. HIV incidence among a cohort of 276 HIV-negative MSM diagnosed with rectal CT and/or GC in New York City sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics was compared to HIV incidence among HIV-negative MSM without these infections. Matches against the citywide HIV/AIDS registry identified HIV diagnoses from STD clinics, and by other providers. Cox proportional hazards models were used to explore factors associated with HIV acquisition among MSM with rectal infections. Results. HIV-negative MSM with rectal infections (>70% of which were asymptomatic) contributed 464.71 person-years of follow-up. Among them, 31 (11.2%) were diagnosed with HIV, of which 14 (45%) were diagnosed by non-STD clinic providers. The annual HIV incidence was significantly higher among MSM with rectal infections (6.67%, 95% CI: 4.61-9.35) than among MSM without rectal infections (2.53%, 95% CI: 1.31-4.42). Black race (hazard ratio=4.98; 95% CI: 1.75-14.17) was associated with incident HIV among MSM with rectal CT/GC. Conclusions. One in 15 MSM with rectal infections was diagnosed with HIV within a year, a higher risk than for MSM without rectal infections. Such data has implications for screening for rectal STD, and may be useful for targeting populations for risk-reduction counseling and other HIV prevention strategies, such as pre-exposure prophylaxis.

0 Followers
 · 
72 Views
  • Clinical Microbiology and Infection 10/2013; 19(10):887-8. DOI:10.1111/1469-0691.12331 · 5.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines recommend azithromycin or doxycycline for treatment of rectal chlamydial infection. We created a retrospective cohort of male patients diagnosed as having rectal chlamydia between 1993 and 2012 at a sexually transmitted disease clinic in Seattle, Washington. Men were included in the analysis if they were treated with azithromycin (1 g single dose) or doxycycline (100 mg twice a day × 7 days) within 60 days of chlamydia diagnosis and returned for repeat testing 14 to 180 days after treatment. We compared the risk of persistent/recurrent rectal chlamydial infection among recipients of the 2 drug regimens using 4 follow-up testing time intervals (14-30, 60, 90, and 180 days). Of 1835 cases of rectal chlamydia diagnosed in the study period, 1480 (81%) were treated with azithromycin or doxycycline without a second drug active against Chlamydia trachomatis. Of these, 407 (33%) of 1231 azithromycin-treated men and 95 (38%) of 249 doxycycline-treated men were retested 14 to 180 days after treatment (P = 0.12); 88 (22%) and 8 (8%), respectively, had persistent/recurrent infection (P = 0.002). Persistent/recurrent infection was higher among men treated with azithromycin compared with doxycycline at 14 to 30 days (4/53 [8%] vs. 0/20 [0%]), 14 to 60 days (23/136 [17%] vs. 0/36 [0%]), and 14 to 90 days (50/230 [22%] vs. 2/56 [4%]). In multivariate analysis, azithromycin-treated men had a significantly higher risk of persistent/recurrent infection in the 14 to 90 days (adjusted relative risk, 5.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-21.0) and 14 to 180 days (adjusted relative risk, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.8) after treatment. These data suggest that doxycycline may be more effective than azithromycin in the treatment of rectal chlamydial infections.
    Sexually transmitted diseases 02/2014; 41(2):79-85. DOI:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000088 · 2.75 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Men who have sex with men (MSM) in Australia and overseas are disproportionately affected by sexually transmissible infections (STIs), including HIV. Many STIs are asymptomatic, so regular testing and management of asymptomatic MSM remains an important component of effective control. We reviewed articles from January 2009-May 2013 to inform the 2014 update of the 2010 Australian testing guidelines for asymptomatic MSM. Key changes include: a recommendation for pharyngeal chlamydia (Chlamydia trachomatis) testing, use of nucleic acid amplification tests alone for gonorrhoea (Neisseria gonorrhoeae) testing (without gonococcal culture), more frequent (up to four times a year) gonorrhoea and chlamydia testing in sexually active HIV-positive MSM, time required since last void for chlamydia first-void urine collection specified at 20 min, urethral meatal swab as an alternative to first-void urine for urethral chlamydia testing, and the use of electronic reminders to increase STI and HIV retesting rates among MSM.
    Sexual Health 04/2014; 11(3). DOI:10.1071/SH14003 · 1.58 Impact Factor
Show more