Different Ways to Balance the Spine: Subtle Changes in Sagittal Spinal Curves Affect Regional Muscle Activity

Centre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury and Health, The University of Queensland, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Brisbane, Australia.
Spine (Impact Factor: 2.45). 03/2009; 34(6):E208-14. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181908ead
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Exploratory study of regional muscle activity in different postures.
To detail the relationship between spinal curves and regional muscle activity.
Sagittal balanced spinal posture (C7 above S1 in the sagittal plane) is a goal for spinal surgery and conservative ergonomics. Three combinations of thoracolumbar and lumbar spinal curves can be considered sagittal balanced postures: (i) flat-at both regions, (ii) long lordosis-lordotic at both regions, and (iii) short lordosis-thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis. This study compares regional muscle activity between these 3 sagittal balanced postures in sitting, as well as a slump posture.
Fine-wire electromyography (EMG) electrodes were inserted into the lumbar multifidus (deep and superficial), iliocostalis (lateral and medial), longissimus thoracis, and transversus abdominis in 14 healthy male volunteers. Fine-wire or surface EMG electrodes were also used to record activity of the obliquus internus, obliquus externus, and rectus abdominis muscles. Root mean square EMG amplitude in the flat, long lordosis, short lordosis, and slump sitting postures were normalized to maximal voluntary contraction, and also to the peak activity across the sitting postures. Muscle activity was compared between postures with a linear mixed model analysis.
Of the extensor muscles, it was most notable that activity of the deep and superficial fibers of lumbar multifidus increased incrementally in the 3 sagittal balanced postures; flat, long lordosis, and short lordosis (P < 0.05). Of the abdominal muscles, obliquus internus was more active in short lordosis than the other postures (P < 0.05). Comparing the sagittal balanced postures, the flat posture showed the least muscle activity (similar to the slump posture at most muscles examined).
Discrete combinations of muscle activity supported the 3 different sagittal balanced postures in sitting, providing new detail for surgeons, researchers, and therapists to distinguish between different sagittal balanced postures.

Download full-text


Available from: Andrew P Claus, Jul 28, 2015
  • Source
    • "t for differences in STS coordination between HU and AT ? Throughout the STS movement , postural tone must sup - port the mass of the upper body and prevent it from collapsing against gravity . As the axial musculature is highly complex and redundant , this postural support can be achieved in different ways , with differing spatial distributions ( Claus et al . 2009 ; O &apos; Sullivan et al . 2006 ) and different dynamic control ( Caccia - tore et al . 2011a ; Gurfinkel et al . 2006 ) . The specific way this support is achieved creates a stiffness distribution across the body or " postural frame . " This may not be localized to the portion of the body being supported , but could extend to more dis"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While Alexander technique (AT) teachers have been reported to stand up by shifting weight gradually as they incline the trunk forward, healthy untrained (HU) adults appear unable to rise in this way. This study examines the hypothesis that HU have difficulty rising smoothly, and that this difficulty relates to reported differences in postural stiffness between groups. A wide range of movement durations (1-8 s) and anteroposterior foot placements were studied under the instruction to rise at a uniform rate. Before seat-off (SO) there were clear and profound performance differences between groups, particularly for slower movements, that could not be explained by strength differences. For each movement duration, HU used approximately twice the forward center-of-mass (CoM) velocity and vertical feet-loading rate as AT. For slow movements, HU violated task instruction by abruptly speeding up and rapidly shifting weight just before SO. In contrast, AT shifted weight gradually while smoothly advancing the CoM, achieving a more anterior CoM at SO. A neuromechanical model revealed a mechanism whereby stiffness affects standing up by exacerbating a conflict between postural and balance constraints. Thus activating leg extensors to take body weight hinders forward CoM progression toward the feet. HU's abrupt weight shift can be explained by reliance on momentum to stretch stiff leg extensors. AT's smooth rises can be explained by heightened dynamic tone control that reduces leg extensor resistance and improves force transmission across the trunk. Our results suggest postural control shapes movement coordination through a dynamic "postural frame" that affects the resistive behavior of the body.
    Journal of Neurophysiology 08/2014; 112(3):719-29. DOI:10.1152/jn.00617.2013 · 3.04 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Sagittal balance or ''neutral upright sagittal spinal alignment'' is a postural goal of surgical, ergonomic, and physiotherapeutic intervention. However, a wide variety of thoracic and lumbar spinal curves may correspond with the accepted criterion of sagittal balance (50 mm of C7–S1 sagittal deviation in asymptomatic adults while standing) [6] [7], making it difficult for surgeons, researchers, therapists, and patients to know if they are examining or achieving the same postural goal [8]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lumbar lordosis is a key postural component that has interested both clinicians and researchers for many years. Despite its wide use in assessing postural abnormalities, there remain many unanswered questions regarding lumbar lordosis measurements. Therefore, in this article we reviewed different factors associated with the lordosis angle based on existing literature and determined normal values of lordosis. We reviewed more than 120 articles that measure and describe the different factors associated with the lumbar lordosis angle. Because of a variety of factors influencing the evaluation of lumbar lordosis such as how to position the patient and the number of vertebrae included in the calculation, we recommend establishing a uniform method of evaluating the lordosis angle. Based on our review, it seems that the optimal position for radiologic measurement of lordosis is standing with arms supported while shoulders are flexed at a 30° angle. There is evidence that many factors, such as age, gender, body mass index, ethnicity, and sport, may affect the lordosis angle, making it difficult to determine uniform normal values. Normal lordosis should be determined based on the specific characteristics of each individual; we therefore presented normal lordosis values for different groups/populations. There is also evidence that the lumbar lordosis angle is positively and significantly associated with spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis. However, no association has been found with other spinal degenerative features. Inconclusive evidence exists for association between lordosis and low back pain. Additional studies are needed to evaluate these associations. The optimal lordotic range remains unknown and may be related to a variety of individual factors such as weight, activity, muscular strength, and flexibility of the spine and lower extremities.
    The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society 10/2013; 14(1). DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.464 · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "No angular offsets were found between EX and OW for the trunk or pelvic position in all three planes, with the exception of a greater degree of anterior tilt of the pelvis in the EX condition. Influences of anterior pelvic tilt (O'Sullivan et al., 2006) and accompanying lordotic spinal posture (Claus et al., 2009), similar in magnitude to that observed within this investigation, have previously been shown to recruit both the superficial and deep fibres of the LM to approximately 30e40% of maximal voluntary Figure 2 Hip (A) and knee (B) angles are presented for overground walking ( ) and exercise (À) conditions. The shaded region represents the standard deviation for the exercise device data series. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to determine the kinematic differences between movements on a new exercise device (EX) that promotes a stable trunk over a moving, unstable base of support, and overground walking (OW). Sixteen male participants performed EX and OW trials while their movements were tracked using a 3D motion capture system. Trunk and pelvis range of motion (ROM) were similar between EX and OW in the sagittal and frontal planes, and reduced for EX in the transverse plane. The pelvis was tilted anteriorly, on average, by about 16° in EX compared to OW. Hip and knee ROM were reduced in EX compared to OW. The exercise device appears to promote similar or reduced lumbopelvic motion, compared to walking, which could contribute to more tonic activity of the local lumbopelvic musculature.
    Journal of bodywork and movement therapies 10/2013; 17(4):462-8. DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.02.004
Show more