Article

Errors in administration of parenteral drugs in intensive care units: multinational prospective study

Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
BMJ (online) (Impact Factor: 16.38). 02/2009; 338(mar12 1):b814. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b814
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To assess on a multinational level the frequency, characteristics, contributing factors, and preventive measures of administration errors in parenteral medication in intensive care units.
Observational, prospective, 24 hour cross sectional study with self reporting by staff.
113 intensive care units in 27 countries.
1328 adults in intensive care.
Number of errors; impact of errors; distribution of error characteristics; distribution of contributing and preventive factors.
861 errors affecting 441 patients were reported: 74.5 (95% confidence interval 69.5 to 79.4) events per 100 patient days. Three quarters of the errors were classified as errors of omission. Twelve patients (0.9% of the study population) experienced permanent harm or died because of medication errors at the administration stage. In a multiple logistic regression with patients as the unit of analysis, odds ratios for the occurrence of at least one parenteral medication error were raised for number of organ failures (odds ratio per increase of one organ failure: 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.34); use of any intravenous medication (yes v no: 2.73, 1.39 to 5.36); number of parenteral administrations (per increase of one parenteral administration: 1.06, 1.04 to 1.08); typical interventions in patients in intensive care (yes v no: 1.50, 1.14 to 1.96); larger intensive care unit (per increase of one bed: 1.01, 1.00 to 1.02); number of patients per nurse (per increase of one patient: 1.30, 1.03 to 1.64); and occupancy rate (per 10% increase: 1.03, 1.00 to 1.05). Odds ratios for the occurrence of parenteral medication errors were decreased for presence of basic monitoring (yes v no: 0.19, 0.07 to 0.49); an existing critical incident reporting system (yes v no: 0.69, 0.53 to 0.90); an established routine of checks at nurses' shift change (yes v no: 0.68, 0.52 to 0.90); and an increased ratio of patient turnover to the size of the unit (per increase of one patient: 0.73, 0.57 to 0.93).
Parenteral medication errors at the administration stage are common and a serious safety problem in intensive care units. With the increasing complexity of care in critically ill patients, organisational factors such as error reporting systems and routine checks can reduce the risk for such errors.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Rui Moreno, Aug 17, 2015
3 Followers
 · 
278 Views
  • Source
    • "Prescribing has been identified as a particular problem of " preparedness " for new doctors (Lemmp et al., 2005; Heaton et al., 2008) and a recent multi centre international study (Valentin et al., 2009) found that trainees were involved in 50 þ per cent of errors with subsequent serious harm to patients. Supervision was identified as the focus for concern in these incidents; decreased errors were associated with organisational strategies that reduce complexity and avoid gaps in communication. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aims of this paper are to understand the links between work transitions and doctors' performance and to identify the implications for policy, regulation, practice and research. The paper explains transitions in terms of the inseparability of learning, practice and performance and introduces the concept of the transition as a critically intensive learning period to draw attention to this phenomenon. It also identifies implications for practice, research and regulation. Drawing on empirical data in relation to prescribing and case management, the paper will show that, in contrast to current assumptions of, understanding about and practice in doctors' transitions, doctors can never be fully prepared in advance for aspects of their work. Transitions are explained in terms of the inseparability of learning, practice and performance and we introduce the concept of the transition as a critically intensive learning period to draw attention to this phenomenon. Also identified are implications for practice, research and regulation.
    Journal of Health Organisation and Management 11/2010; 24(6):556-70. DOI:10.1108/14777261011088656 · 0.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Die Erfassung und Analyse von Fehlern stellt heute ein wesentliches Instrument der Qualitätsverbesserung an Intensivstationen dar. Das Risikopotenzial für das Entstehen von Fehlern ist an Intensivstationen sehr hoch. Auch wenn Fehler nicht völlig vermeidbar sind, gilt es, die Häufigkeit und die aus Fehlern resultierenden Folgen zu reduzieren. Ein Systemansatz hierfür muss die Limitationen der menschlichen Natur berücksichtigen und Arbeitsbedingungen, Arbeitsplätze und Prozesse auf Intensivstationen in einer fehlervermeidenden Weise gestalten. Die Entwicklung einer präventiven Sicherheitskultur ist als wesentliches Ziel für Intensivstationen einzustufen.
    01/2012; 107(4). DOI:10.1007/s00063-011-0059-9
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patientensicherheit ist ein wesentliches Paradigma der Intensivmedizin. Zahlreiche Berichte zeigten einen dringenden Bedarf für Intensivstationen auf, die Sicherheit von Schlüsselprozessen, z.B. der Medikamentenverabreichung, zu verbessern. Ein erster Schritt sind eine erhöhte Aufmerksamkeit für und die Wahrnehmung von Fehlern. Der Einsatz von Fehlerberichtssystemen, die auf der Meldung durch das Personal basieren, erwies sich als praktikabel und trägt zu einer Risikoreduktion bei. Ein fortgeschrittener Ansatz inkludiert die aktive Suche nach Schwachstellen im System und setzt einen kulturellen Wandel voraus. Eine offene Kommunikation und der Informationsaustausch zwischen Berufsgruppen sind hierfür eine Voraussetzung. Für etliche Interventionen konnte eine Reduktion von Fehlern oder unerwünschten Ereignissen gezeigt werden. Wichtige Komponenten sind Arbeitsumgebung und Arbeitsbelastung, Personalausstattung, Fähigkeiten und Kompetenzen, Kommunikation sowie die Standardisierung von Routineprozessen. Patient safety is an essential paradigm in the practice of intensive care medicine. Several reports have demonstrated an urgent need for intensive care units (ICUs) to improve the safety of key processes, such as the administration of drugs. A very first step in the effort to reduce the number of adverse events is to raise awareness and to recognize errors. The use of critical incident reporting systems with self-reporting has been shown to be practicable and to contribute to a considerable risk reduction. A more advanced approach includes the active search for hazards and system flaws and requires a sustained cultural change. Open communication and interprofessional exchange of information are essential in the development of such a safety culture. Several interventions have been shown to reduce errors or to decrease the number of adverse events. Important factors are working environment, workload and staffing, skills and competency, communication and management of standard operations. SchlüsselwörterSicherheit–Medizinische Fehler–Sicherheitskultur–Fehlerberichtsysteme–Qualitätsverbesserung KeywordsSafety–Medical errors–Safety culture–Critical incident reporting system–Quality improvement
    Intensivmedizin + Notfallmedizin 04/2011; 48(3):233-242. DOI:10.1007/s00390-011-0263-0
Show more