Article

A pilot study of sleep, cognition, and respiration under 4 weeks of intermittent nocturnal hypoxia in adult humans

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Sleep Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.1). 04/2009; 10(7):739-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2008.07.013
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A pilot study to examine the effects of intermittent nocturnal hypoxia on sleep, respiration and cognition in healthy adult humans.
Participants were eight healthy, non-smoking subjects (four male, four female), mean age of 26.4+/-5.2 years, and BMI 22.3+/-2.6 kg/m(2), exposed to 9h of intermittent hypoxia between the hours of 10 P.M. and 7 A.M. for 28 consecutive nights. At a simulated altitude of 13,000 feet (FIO(2) 0.13), intermittent hypoxia was achieved by administering nasal nitrogen, alternating with brief (approximately 5s) boluses of nasal oxygen. Pre- and post-exposure assessments included polysomnography, attention (20-min Psychomotor Vigilance Test), working memory (10-min verbal 2 and 3-back), Multiple Sleep Latency Test, and the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Obstructive and non-obstructive respiratory events were scored.
Overall sleep quality showed worsening trends but no statistically significant change following exposure. There was no difference after hypoxia in sleepiness, encoding, attention or working memory. Hyperoxic central apneas and post-hyperoxic respiratory instability were noted as special features of disturbed respiratory control induced by intermittent nocturnal hypoxia.
In this model, exposure to nocturnal intermittent hypoxia for 4 weeks caused no significant deficits in subjective or objective alertness, vigilance, or working memory.

0 Followers
 · 
143 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intermittent hypoxia has generally been perceived as a high risk stimulus, particularly in the field of sleep medicine, because it is thought to initiate detrimental cardiovascular, cognitive and metabolic outcomes. In contrast, the link between intermittent hypoxia and beneficial outcomes has received less attention, perhaps because it is not universally understood that outcome measures following exposure to intermittent hypoxia may be linked to the administered dose. The present review is designed to emphasize the less recognized beneficial outcomes associated with intermittent hypoxia. The review will consider the role intermittent hypoxia has in cardiovascular and autonomic adaptations, respiratory motor plasticity and cognitive function. Each section will highlight the literature that contributed to the belief that intermittent hypoxia leads primarily to detrimental outcomes. The second segment of each section will consider the possible risks associated with experimentally rather than naturally induced intermittent hypoxia. Lastly, the body of literature indicating that intermittent hypoxia initiates primarily beneficial outcomes will be considered. The overarching theme of the review is that the use of intermittent hypoxia in research investigations, coupled with reasonable safeguards, should be encouraged because of the potential benefits linked to the administration of a variety of low risk intermittent hypoxia protocols. Copyright © 2014, Journal of Applied Physiology.
    Journal of Applied Physiology 12/2014; 118(5):jap.00564.2014. DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.00564.2014 · 3.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sleep-disordered breathing (characterized by recurrent arousals from sleep and intermittent hypoxemia) is common among older adults. Cross-sectional studies have linked sleep-disordered breathing to poor cognition; however, it remains unclear whether sleep-disordered breathing precedes cognitive impairment in older adults. To determine the prospective relationship between sleep-disordered breathing and cognitive impairment and to investigate potential mechanisms of this association. Prospective sleep and cognition study of 298 women without dementia (mean [SD] age: 82.3 [3.2] years) who had overnight polysomnography measured between January 2002 and April 2004 in a substudy of the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. Sleep-disordered breathing was defined as an apnea-hypopnea index of 15 or more events per hour of sleep. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the independent association of sleep-disordered breathing with risk of mild cognitive impairment or dementia, adjusting for age, race, body mass index, education level, smoking status, presence of diabetes, presence of hypertension, medication use (antidepressants, benzodiazepines, or nonbenzodiazepine anxiolytics), and baseline cognitive scores. Measures of hypoxia, sleep fragmentation, and sleep duration were investigated as underlying mechanisms for this relationship. Adjudicated cognitive status (normal, dementia, or mild cognitive impairment) based on data collected between November 2006 and September 2008. Compared with the 193 women without sleep-disordered breathing, the 105 women (35.2%) with sleep-disordered breathing were more likely to develop mild cognitive impairment or dementia (31.1% [n = 60] vs 44.8% [n = 47]; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-3.08). Elevated oxygen desaturation index (≥15 events/hour) and high percentage of sleep time (>7%) in apnea or hypopnea (both measures of disordered breathing) were associated with risk of developing mild cognitive impairment or dementia (AOR, 1.71 [95% CI, 1.04-2.83] and AOR, 2.04 [95% CI, 1.10-3.78], respectively). Measures of sleep fragmentation (arousal index and wake after sleep onset) or sleep duration (total sleep time) were not associated with risk of cognitive impairment. Among older women, those with sleep-disordered breathing compared with those without sleep-disordered breathing had an increased risk of developing cognitive impairment.
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 08/2011; 306(6):613-9. DOI:10.1001/jama.2011.1115 · 30.39 Impact Factor
  • Source
    American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 05/2013; 187(10):1148-50. DOI:10.1164/rccm.201209-1742LE · 11.99 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
2 Downloads
Available from