Evolution, the Five Factor Model, and Levels of Personality

California State University, Long Beach
Journal of Personality (Impact Factor: 2.44). 03/1998; DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00505.x
Source: CiteSeer

ABSTRACT This paper interprets the Five Factor Model as subsuming variation in normative, speciestypical systems with adaptive functions in the human environment of evolutionary adaptedness. It is argued that the evolutionary logic of personality systems is apparent in the patterning of mean sex differences in personality. Personality systems are conceptualized as evolved motivational systems with an affective core. The evolved motive dispositions at the core of personality anchor a hierarchy of levels of cognitive and behavioral functioning aimed at attaining or avoiding the affective states central to these personality systems. Personality systems are seen as often in dynamic conflict within individuals and as highly compartmentalized in their functioning between settings. While variation in personality consists of a range of viable strategies for humans, extremes on these systems tend to be maladaptive, although in at least some cases individuals who approach the maladaptive extremes of indi...

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evolutionary theory and adaptation-based explanations in psychology have become increasingly common within the last 20 to 30 years, and researchers are beginning to utilise the evolutionary paradigm in the study of personality and individual differences. This chapter examines several evolutionarily oriented personality trait studies to highlight apparent tendencies towards simple genetic determinism, and contrasts this method with the more developmentally sensitive approach pursued in some recent works in moral psychology. Salient theoretical concerns addressed include the direct inheritance of behavioural predispositions, and the environmental and developmental calibration of universally inherited potentials. The implications of these issues are discussed.
    Personality and Individual Differences: Current Directions, Edited by Dr. Richard E. Hicks, 01/2010: chapter 12;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The maintenance of personality variation remains an unexplained puzzle in evolutionary biology. Despite evidence among non-humans that personality variation affects fitness, few data exist to assess the personality–fitness relationship in humans. Among Tsimane forager–horticulturalists (n = 632), we test whether personality traits (assessed using a 43-item Big Five Inventory administered orally in native language) predict fertility, offspring survivorship, age of first reproduction, and other fitness correlates (extramarital affairs, conflicts, social visitation, food production, and several health measures). Among men, several personality factors associate with higher fertility, more time spent producing food and social visitation. Among women, the relationship between personality and fitness varies across regions of Tsimane territory. The only case of an intermediate personality level associated with highest fitness was found for Industriousness in men. We find that personality factors positively associated with fitness do not associate with greater health costs, although greater Extraversion and Openness may lead to more conflicts among men. Factor heritability ranges from 60% for Prosociality and Extraversion to 8% for Neuroticism. We interpret our results in light of evolutionary models that explain maintenance of personality variation, including incomplete directional selection, mutation–selection balance, condition-dependent reaction norms and fluctuating selection based on sex or spatial variability in selection pressures.
    Evolution and Human Behavior 01/2013; · 3.95 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The current paper synthesizes theory and data from the field of life history (LH) evolution to advance a new developmental theory of variation in human LH strategies. The theory posits that clusters of correlated LH traits (e.g., timing of puberty, age at sexual debut and first birth, parental investment strategies) lie on a slow-to-fast continuum; that harshness (externally caused levels of morbidity-mortality) and unpredictability (spatial-temporal variation in harshness) are the most fundamental environmental influences on the evolution and development of LH strategies; and that these influences depend on population densities and related levels of intraspecific competition and resource scarcity, on age schedules of mortality, on the sensitivity of morbidity-mortality to the organism's resource-allocation decisions, and on the extent to which environmental fluctuations affect individuals versus populations over short versus long timescales. These interrelated factors operate at evolutionary and developmental levels and should be distinguished because they exert distinctive effects on LH traits and are hierarchically operative in terms of primacy of influence. Although converging lines of evidence support core assumptions of the theory, many questions remain unanswered. This review demonstrates the value of applying a multilevel evolutionary-developmental approach to the analysis of a central feature of human phenotypic variation: LH strategy.
    Human Nature 06/2009; 20(2):204-268. · 1.96 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 20, 2014