Primary care pediatricians' experience, comfort and competence in the evaluation and management of child maltreatment: Do we need child abuse experts?

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Child Protection, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Child abuse & neglect (Impact Factor: 2.34). 03/2009; 33(2):76-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.09.003
Source: PubMed


We assessed the self-reported experience, comfort and competence of primary care pediatricians in evaluating and managing child maltreatment (CM), in rendering opinions regarding the likelihood of CM, and in providing court testimony. We examined pediatricians' need for expert consultation when evaluating possible maltreatment.
A questionnaire was mailed to 520 randomly selected AAP members. Pediatricians were asked how frequently they evaluated and reported children for suspected maltreatment, and whether child abuse pediatricians were available to and used by them. Pediatricians were asked to rate their knowledge, comfort and competence in the management of CM. Demographic information was also gathered. Pediatricians' experience with CM, their comfort, self-reported competence, and need for expert assistance is described. Logistic regression was used to assess factors that predicted pediatricians' sense of competence while controlling for covariates found to be significant in bivariate analyses.
One hundred forty-seven questionnaires were eligible for analysis. The majority of respondents had little experience evaluating and reporting suspected CM, and was interested in having expert consultation. While pediatricians often felt competent in conducting medical exams for suspected maltreatment, they felt less competent in rendering a definitive opinion, and did not generally feel competent to testify in court. Sense of competence was particularly low for sexual abuse. Increased practice experience and more courses in CM led to increased sense of competence in some areas.
Pediatricians acknowledged many limitations to providing care to maltreated children, and expressed interest in subspecialist input.
These findings add additional support to the American Board of Pediatrics' decision to create a Child Abuse Pediatrics subspecialty. The findings also indicate a need to ensure funding for fellowship training programs in this field.

Download full-text


Available from: Wendy G Lane,
  • Source
    • "A number of studies have identified characteristics of the worker that influence reporting behavior such as the age of the reporter (Zellman & Bell, 1990), gender (Al- Moosa, Al-Shaiji, Al-Fadhli, Al-Bayed & Adib, 2003; Hansen et al., 1997; Kenny, 2001; Tilden et al., 1994; Webster, O'Toole, O'Toole & Lucal, 2005), ethnicity (Ashton, 2004; Kenny, 2001; Levi, Brown & Erb, 2006; O'Toole, Webster, O'Toole & Lucal, 1999; Webster et al., 2005), years of experience (Kenny, 2001; Lane & Dubowitz, 2009; O'Toole et al., 1999), training (Feng & Levine, 2005; Hansen et al., 1997; Sedlak & Schultz, 1997; Tilden et al., 1994; Webster et al., 2005); reporting history (Delaronde et al., 2000; O'Toole et al., 1999; Webster et al., 2005; Zellman & Bell, 1990) and agency setting (O'Toole et al., 1999; Webster et al., 2005; Zellman & Bell, 1990). Moreover, there is some empirical evidence indicating that understanding of the law and attitude toward the law is related to the reporting of child maltreatment. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examined social workers' perceptions of the New York State law requiring the reporting of child maltreatment and the relationship of those perceptions with the likelihood that workers would report incidents of maltreatment to child protective services. Data were collected by a mailed questionnaire from a sample of 710 social workers belonging to the New York City chapter of NASW. Findings show that social workers differ in their understanding of the law and that the worker's understanding is related to reporting behavior. The worker's understanding of the law had a small but significant effect on the likelihood of reporting, accounting for 6% of the variance. The binomial effect size of the relationship (r = .24) is such that a worker's understanding of the law is sufficient to increase the likelihood of reporting a case of maltreatment from 38% to 62%. Implications for practice are discussed.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As knowledge about child abuse and neglect increases worldwide, so does the literature on abuse and neglect. The authors explore many studies published this year, with attention to the advances in understanding which are guiding prevention efforts as well as diagnosis and treatment of abuse and neglect. The evidence base for many forms of child abuse continues to grow. Controversy around the diagnosis of child abuse still continues, with current debate focused on the diagnosis of abusive head injury and whether children with vitamin D deficiency are misdiagnosed with abusive fractures. As clinicians begin to understand the factors which may increase child vulnerability to abuse, more sophisticated and focused prevention efforts are being implemented, and researchers are evaluating these efforts with an eye to whether or not they really contribute to prevention. The short-term and long-term impact of child maltreatment is significant not only for individuals but for families and communities in which abuse is taking place. General pediatricians have an important role to play with families and in the community as advocates for the protection of children. However, it is clear that specialists in child abuse should also play a role in order for diagnosis and management of abuse to adhere to a high standard of care. This has been validated this year by the creation of Child Abuse Pediatrics as a board certified specialty in the United States. As knowledge about abuse and neglect grows, clinicians are focusing on prevention as well as diagnosis and treatment.
    Current opinion in pediatrics 02/2010; 22(2):226-33. DOI:10.1097/MOP.0b013e3283377931 · 2.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It was only 30 years ago that the medical community began to develop an increased awareness of child sexual abuse, and the role of the medical provider in the evaluation of sexually abused children has evolved significantly. As clinicians worldwide develop a greater understanding of the impact of the sexual abuse evaluation on the child, the roles of the physician and nurse have changed. In the United States, current practice often uses a multidisciplinary assessment involving skilled forensic interviewing of the child and a medical examination done by a medical provider with specialized training in sexual abuse. In order to minimize child interviews, these assessments are frequently held in settings such as child advocacy centers, where forensic interviewers and medical clinicians, child protective service workers, and police and district attorneys can work jointly to address the legal and protective issues in a coordinated fashion.
    Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 11/2010; 19(6):669-86. DOI:10.1080/10538712.2010.523448 · 0.75 Impact Factor
Show more