Relationship of body mass index with main limb fragility fractures in postmenopausal women.

Modulo Dipartimentale di Medicina Interna, Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli, Via Pupilli,1, 40136, Bologna, Italy.
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism (Impact Factor: 2.11). 04/2009; 27(4):479-84. DOI: 10.1007/s00774-009-0056-8
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Body mass index (BMI) has been found to be related to the risk of osteoporotic hip fractures in women, regardless of bone mineral density (BMD). The same relationship is under debate for other limb fragility fractures. Very few studies have investigated the comparison of fracture risk among BMI categories, classified according to the WHO criteria, despite the potential usefulness of such information for clinical purposes. To address these issues we studied 2,235 postmenopausal women including those with fragility fractures of the hip (187), ankle (108), wrist (226) and humerus (85). Statistical analyses were performed by logistic regression by treating the fracture status as the dependent variable and age, age at menopause, femoral neck BMD and BMI as covariates. BMI was tested as a continuous or categorical variable. As a continuous variable, increased BMI had a protective effect against hip fracture: OR 0.949 (95% CI, 0.900-0.999), but carried a higher risk of humerus fracture: OR 1.077 (95% CI, 1.017-1.141). Among the BMI categories, only leanness: OR 3.819 (95% CI, 2.035-7.168) and obesity: OR 3.481 (95% CI, 1.815-6.678) showed a significantly higher fracture risk for hip and humerus fractures, respectively. There was no relationship between ankle and wrist fractures and BMI. In conclusion, decreasing BMI increases the risk for hip fracture, whereas increasing BMI increases the risk for humerus fractures. Leanness-related low BMD and obesity-related body instability might explain the different BMI relationships with these two types of fracture.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Obesity is associated with greater areal BMD (aBMD) and considered protective against hip and vertebral fracture. Despite this, there is a higher prevalence of lower leg and proximal humerus fracture in obesity. We aimed to determine if there are site-specific differences in BMD, bone structure or strength between obese and normal weight adults. We studied 100 individually-matched pairs of normal (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2) and obese (BMI>30 kg/m2) men and women, aged 25-40 or 55-75 years. We assessed aBMD at the whole body (WB), hip (TH) and lumbar spine (LS) with DXA, LS Tb.vBMD by QCT and vBMD, and microarchitecture and strength at the distal radius and tibia with HR-pQCT and micro-finite element analysis. Serum PINP and βCTX were measured by automated ECLIA. Obese adults had greater WB, LS and TH aBMD than normal adults. The effect of obesity on LS and WB aBMD was greater in older than younger adults (p<0.01). Obese adults had greater vBMD than normal adults at the tibia (p<0.001 both ages) and radius (p<0.001 older group), thicker cortices, higher cortical BMD and tissue mineral density, lower cortical porosity, higher trabecular BMD and greater trabecular number than normal adults. There was no difference in bone size between obese and normal adults. Obese adults had greater estimated failure load at the radius (p<0.05) and tibia (p<0.01). Differences in HR-pQCT measurements between obese and normal adults were seen more consistently in the older than the younger group. Bone turnover markers were lower in obese than normal adults. Greater BMD in obesity is not an artefact of DXA measurement. Obese adults have higher BMD, thicker and denser cortices and higher trabecular number than normal adults. Greater differences between obese and normal adults in the older group suggest obesity may protect against age-related bone loss, and also increase peak bone mass. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
    Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 11/2014; DOI:10.1002/jbmr.2407 · 6.59 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Osteoporosis is a common disease, characterized by low bone mass with micro-architectural disruption and skeletal fragility, resulting in an increased risk of fracture. A substantial number of studies has examined the possible relationship between body weight, bone mineral density and fracture risk in post-menopausal women, with the majority of them concluding that low body weight correlates with increased risk of fracture, especially hip fracture. Controversies about the potential protective effect of obesity on osteoporosis and consequent fracture risk still exist. Several recent studies question the concept that obesity exerts a protective effect against fractures, suggesting that it stands as a risk factor for fractures at specific skeletal sites, such as upper arm. The association between body weight and fracture risk is complex, differs across skeletal sites and body mass index, and is modified by the interaction between body weight and bone mineral density. Some potential explanations that link obesity with increased fracture risk may be the pattern of falls and impaired mobility in obese individuals, comorbidities, such as asthma, diabetes and early menopause, as well as, increased parathyroid hormone and reduced 25-hydroxy-vitamin D concentrations. © 2015 World Obesity.
    Obesity Reviews 01/2015; 16(3). DOI:10.1111/obr.12244 · 7.86 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Obesity was commonly thought to be advantageous for maintaining healthy bones due to the higher bone mineral density observed in overweight individuals. However, several recent studies have challenged the widespread belief that obesity is protective against fracture and have suggested that obesity is a risk factor for certain fractures. The effect of obesity on fracture risk is site-dependent, the risk being increased for some fractures (humerus, ankle, upper arm) and decreased for others (hip, pelvis, wrist). Moreover, the relationship between obesity and fracture may also vary by sex, age, and ethnicity. Risk factors for fracture in obese individuals appear to be similar to those in nonobese populations, although patterns of falling are particularly important in the obese. Research is needed to determine if and how visceral fat and metabolic complications of obesity (type 2 diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance, chronic inflammation, etc) are causally associated with bone status and fragility fracture risk. Vitamin D deficiency and hypogonadism may also influence fracture risk in obese individuals. Fracture algorithms such as FRAX(®) might be expected to underestimate fracture probability. Studies specifically designed to evaluate the antifracture efficacy of different drugs in obese patients are not available; however, literature data may suggest that in obese patients higher doses of the bisphosphonates might be required in order to maintain efficacy against nonvertebral fractures. Therefore, the search for better methods for the identification of fragility fracture risk in the growing population of adult and elderly subjects with obesity might be considered a clinical priority which could improve the prevention of fracture in obese individuals.
    Clinical Interventions in Aging 09/2014; 9:1629-1636. DOI:10.2147/CIA.S64625 · 1.82 Impact Factor