Analysis of clinical factors associated with anal function after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer.

Department of Colorectal and Pelvic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (Impact Factor: 3.34). 01/2009; 52(1):64-70. DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819739a0
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to identify factors that have a negative impact on anal function after intersphincteric resection.
We evaluated postoperative anal function in 96 patients with very lower rectal cancer who underwent intersphincteric resection by having patients fill out detailed questionnaires at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Univariate and multivariate analysis based on the Wexner incontinence score were used to identify factors associated with poor anal function after intersphincteric resection.
The mean Wexner score at 12 months after stoma closure was 10.0. Patients with frequent major soiling showed a Wexner score of >or=16, and this score was used as a cutoff value of poor anal function. In the univariate analysis, poor anal function was significantly associated with a greater extent of excision of the internal sphincter and with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. In the multivariate analysis, preoperative chemoradiotherapy was the only independent factor associated with poor anal function after intersphincteric resection (odds ratio=10.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.3-46.3, P < 0.01).
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy was identified as the risk factor with the greatest negative impact on anal function after intersphincteric resection, regardless of extent of excision of the internal sphincter.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As an anus-preserving surgery for very low rectal cancer, intersphincteric resection (ISR), has advanced markedly over the last 20 years. We investigated long-term oncologic, functional, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes after ISR with or without partial external sphincter resection (PESR).
    Annals of Surgical Oncology 06/2014; · 4.12 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Colorectal cancer (CRC) in the elderly is extremely common but only a few clinicians are familiar with the complexity of issues which present in the geriatric population. In this phase of the life cycle, treatment is frequently suboptimal. Despite the fact that, nowadays, older people tend to be healthier than in previous generations, surgical undertreatment is frequently encountered. On the other hand, surgical overtreatment in the vulnerable or frail patient can lead to unacceptable postoperative outcomes with high mortality or persistent disability. Unfortunately, due to the geriatric patient being traditionally excluded from randomized controlled trials for a variety of factors (heterogeneity, frailty, etc.), there is a dearth of evidence-based clinical guidelines for the management of these patients. The objective of this review was to summarize the most relevant clinical studies available in order to assist clinicians in the management of CRC in the elderly. More than in any other patient group, both surgical and non-surgical management strategies should be carefully individualized in the elderly population affected by CRC. Although cure and sphincter preservation are the primary goals, many other variables need to be taken into account, such as maintenance of cognitive status, independence, life expectancy and quality of life.
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 04/2014; 20(14):3762-3777. · 2.55 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSES: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the postoperative complications, the length of the hospital stay, the clinic functional results, and the oncological outcome at 2,5 years follow-up of patients with very low rectal cancer treated by laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis and intersphincteric resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 491 patients were treated by laparoscopic colorectal surgery, 13 of 172 with rectal cancer were selected and prospectively evaluated. All with very low rectal cancer, 9 female. No patient T4 or with complete response to quimioirradiation was selected. Quimioirradiation was used in 8 patients. RESULTS: The postoperative complication rate was 23,1% and the anastomotic fistulas rate was 7,7%. No patients died postoperatively. 61,5% of the patients were discharged before 7 days of hospital stay. The median number of harvested lymphnodes was 13. Mean distal tumor-free margin was 1,5 cm. Circumferential margin was positive in 1 case (7,7%). Fecal incontinence was related in 41% of the patients and fracionned evacuations in 91%. Eleven patients (84%) have related good quality of life. One patient is with definitive stoma (7,7%). With median follow-up of 30 months, there were one local recurrence (7,7%) and two cases of lung metastases (15,4 %). All, the three patients died of the diseases. Ten patients are survived (77%) without disease. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of results led to the following conclusions: a) The technique employed is safe and have presented low rate of complication and no mortality; b) The use of this technique have permited short length of the hospital stay; c) Functional results were regular , but colostomy was avoid in 92,3% of the patients; d) The use of this technique does not compromise the oncological outcome at a median follow-up of 30 months.
    Revista Brasileira de Coloproctologia 09/2009; 29(3):314-324.