Article

Cognitive Differences in Pictorial Reasoning Between High-Functioning Autism and Asperger's Syndrome

Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., E25-519, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (Impact Factor: 3.06). 04/2009; 39(7):1014-23. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-009-0712-9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We investigated linguistic and visuospatial processing during pictorial reasoning in high-functioning autism (HFA), Asperger's syndrome (ASP), and age and IQ-matched typically developing participants (CTRL), using three conditions designed to differentially engage linguistic mediation or visuospatial processing (visuospatial, V; semantic, S; visuospatial + semantic, V + S). The three groups did not differ in accuracy, but showed different response time profiles. ASP and CTRL participants were fastest on V + S, amenable to both linguistic and nonlinguistic mediation, whereas HFA participants were equally fast on V and V + S, where visuospatial strategies were available, and slowest on S. HFA participants appeared to favor visuospatial over linguistic mediation. The results support the use of linguistic versus visuospatial tasks for characterizing subtypes on the autism spectrum.

Full-text

Available from: Laurent Mottron, Dec 28, 2013
4 Followers
 · 
244 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: On the autistic spectrum, autism and Asperger syndrome are distinguished with respect to early speech abilities. Speech onset delays and/or certain speech atypicalities are specific to autistics and distinguish them from Asperger individuals. Other reported demarcating features are perceptual and motor skills, with autistics displaying visuo-perceptual peaks and Asperger displaying motor clumsiness. Objectives: To investigate whether autistic spectrum individuals stratified on the basis of speech development atypicalities also differ on perceptual and motor variables. Methods: 30 typically developing, 18 autistic and 17 Asperger (based on clinical diagnosis and speech abilities) participants were assessed with a) an intelligence battery including the Wechsler’s scale of intelligence and the Raven Progressive Matrices b) a motor battery including the Purdue Pegboard and the Annett Peg Moving tests that measure gross and fine motor skills, dexterity, bi-manual and hand-eye coordination; and c) a task measuring perceptual processing speed (PPS), the computerized Inspection Time task. The groups were matched on age (14-27 years), gender and IQ (range 78-129). Results: As predicted, the Asperger group did not show any atypicalities in PPS compared to the TD group, while the autistic group was significantly faster than the TD group (p = .028). In the autism group, PPS was correlated with Raven’s Progressive Matrices performance (r=-.80, p<.001) but not in the Asperger group (r=-.34, p=.178). In motor abilities, both Asperger and autistic groups were significantly slower than the typical group at the Annett task with the dominant hand but only the autistic group was significantly slower with the non-dominant hand. Autistic and Asperger groups were also slower than their typically developing controls with either hand at the Purdue Pegboard task. Although there was a trend with Asperger individuals being more impaired than autistics for most subtests of the Purdue, the difference between autistic and Asperger groups was non-significant. Conclusions: The results suggest that a faster PPS is specific to the autistic spectrum subgroup with speech onset delays and/or atypicalities while the subgroup without speech atypicalities displayed typical PPS. PPS could thus play a role in enhanced perception in autistics, and contribute to their strong performance on Raven’s Progressive Matrices. Motor abilities did not seem to differ significantly between autistic and Asperger individuals. Although this might be due to a lack of power in the study, it is also possible that this variable cannot distinguish the subgroups, or the tasks used were not measuring the area in which the groups can be differentiated. Appropriate tasks might be ones involving the whole body (ex: balance and whole body coordination) rather than just manual dexterity and coordination.
    International Meeting for Autism Research 2011; 05/2011
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) adopt less efficient strategies than typically developing (TD) peers on the Twenty Questions Task (TQT), a measure of verbal problem-solving skills. Although problems with the TQT are typically associated with executive dysfunction, they have also been reported in children who are deaf, suggesting a role for atypical language development. To test the contribution of language history to ASD problem solving, TQT performance was compared in children with high-functioning autism (HFA), children with Asperger syndrome (AS) and TD children. The HFA group used significantly less efficient strategies than both AS and TD children. No group differences were evident on tests of question understanding, planning or verbal fluency. Potential explanations for differences in verbal problem-solving skill are discussed with reference to the development of inner speech and use of visual strategies in ASD. Autism Res 2014, ●●: ●●–●●. © 2014 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Autism Research 12/2014; 7(6). DOI:10.1002/aur.1424 · 4.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Movement atypicalities in speed, coordination, posture, and gait have been observed across the autism spectrum (AS) and atypicalities in coordination are more commonly observed in AS individuals without delayed speech (DSM-IV Asperger) than in those with atypical or delayed speech onset. However, few studies have provided quantitative data to support these mostly clinical observations. Here, we compared perceptual and motor performance between 30 typically developing and AS individuals (21 with speech delay and 18 without speech delay) to examine the associations between limb movement control and atypical speech development. Groups were matched for age, intelligence, and sex. The experimental design included: an inspection time task, which measures visual processing speed; the Purdue Pegboard, which measures finger dexterity, bimanual performance, and hand-eye coordination; the Annett Peg Moving Task, which measures unimanual goal-directed arm movement; and a simple reaction time task. We used analysis of covariance to investigate group differences in task performance and linear regression models to explore potential associations between intelligence, language skills, simple reaction time, and visually guided movement performance. AS participants without speech delay performed slower than typical participants in the Purdue Pegboard subtests. AS participants without speech delay showed poorer bimanual coordination than those with speech delay. Visual processing speed was slightly faster in both AS groups than in the typical group. Altogether, these results suggest that AS individuals with and without speech delay differ in visually guided and visually triggered behavior and show that early language skills are associated with slower movement in simple and complex motor tasks. Autism Res 2015. © 2015 The Authors Autism Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Autism Research
    Autism Research 03/2015; DOI:10.1002/aur.1483 · 4.53 Impact Factor