Article

Preparedness for caring of cancer survivors: a multi-institutional study of medical students and oncology fellows.

David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Journal of Cancer Education (Impact Factor: 1.05). 02/2009; 24(1):28-32. DOI: 10.1080/08858190802665260
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Despite recent advances in cancer survivorship knowledge and care, most medical schools lack a comprehensive survivorship curriculum, potentially leaving students ill-prepared for caring of survivors.
A total of 211 students and 22 oncology fellows in 3 institutions completed a questionnaire assessing knowledge and experience in survivorship care.
Medical students and oncology fellows lack knowledge in key survivorship issues. Students were exposed to cancer survivors frequently in medical school but only half received instruction or practiced critical components of survivorship care.
Improvement of both undergraduate and postgraduate training in survivorship care is urgently warranted.

Full-text

Available from: Sebastian Uijtdehaage, Jun 12, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
115 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The population of cancer survivors is large and growing. Yet after successful completion of treatment, many experience chemotherapy-related late or long-term effects (LEs). The extent to which physicians are aware of LEs is unknown. We conducted a nationally representative survey of 1,130 oncologists and 1,072 primary care providers (PCPs). Respondents were asked to select the LEs they had either observed or seen reported for five chemotherapy agents used to treat breast and colon cancers. We described and compared oncologists' and PCPs' awareness of the specified LEs. Using multivariate logistic regression models, we determined predictors of physicians' awareness of the main LEs associated with the agents. Almost all oncologists (95%) reported awareness of cardiac dysfunction as an LE of doxorubicin and peripheral neuropathy as an LE of paclitaxel (97%) and oxaliplatin (97%). These LEs were reported by 55%, 27%, and 22% of PCPs, respectively. Most oncologists reported awareness of premature menopause (71%) and secondary malignancies (62%) as LEs of cyclophosphamide, compared with only 15% and 17% of PCPs, respectively. Main LEs associated with all four agents were identified by 65% of oncologists and only 6% of PCPs. Although more than half of PCPs were aware of cardiac dysfunction as an LE of doxorubicin, awareness of other LEs was limited. Because PCPs may not be directly exposed to chemotherapy-related LEs, oncologists must communicate this information to PCPs as patients transition to primary care settings. Education for all providers caring for the growing population of cancer survivors is needed.
    Journal of Oncology Practice 11/2013; DOI:10.1200/JOP.2013.001121
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To review the published literature pertaining to radiation oncology in undergraduate medical education. Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE Daily Update and EMBASE databases were searched for the 11-year period of January 1, 1998, through the last week of March 2009. A medical librarian used an extensive list of indexed subject headings and text words. The search returned 640 article references, but only seven contained significant information pertaining to teaching radiation oncology to medical undergraduates. One article described a comprehensive oncology curriculum including recommended radiation oncology teaching objectives and sample student evaluations, two described integrating radiation oncology teaching into a radiology rotation, two described multidisciplinary anatomy-based courses intended to reinforce principles of tumor biology and radiotherapy planning, one described an exercise designed to test clinical reasoning skills within radiation oncology cases, and one described a Web-based curriculum involving oncologic physics. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first review of the literature pertaining to teaching radiation oncology to medical undergraduates, and it demonstrates the paucity of published work in this area of medical education. Teaching radiation oncology should begin early in the undergraduate process, should be mandatory for all students, and should impart knowledge relevant to future general practitioners rather than detailed information relevant only to oncologists. Educators should make use of available model curricula and should integrate radiation oncology teaching into existing curricula or construct stand-alone oncology rotations where the principles of radiation oncology can be conveyed. Assessments of student knowledge and curriculum effectiveness are critical.
    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 03/2010; 76(3):649-55. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.038 · 4.18 Impact Factor
  • The Oncologist 05/2014; 19(6). DOI:10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0384 · 4.54 Impact Factor