Maintenance Rituximab After Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone Prolongs Progression-Free Survival in Advanced Indolent Lymphoma: Results of the Randomized Phase III ECOG1496 Study

New York University Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Journal of Clinical Oncology (Impact Factor: 17.88). 05/2009; 27(10):1607-14. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.1561
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine if maintenance rituximab (MR) after standard chemotherapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced-stage indolent lymphoma.
Patients with stage III-IV indolent lymphoma with responding or stable disease after cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP) chemotherapy were stratified by initial tumor burden, residual disease after CVP (minimal or gross), and histology, and randomly assigned to observation (OBS) or MR 375 mg/m(2) once per week for 4 weeks every 6 months for 2 years. PFS was the primary end point.
Three hundred eleven (282 with follicular lymphoma) evaluable patients who received CVP were randomly assigned to OBS (n = 158) or MR (n = 153). Best response improved in 22% MR versus 7% OBS patients (P = .00006). Toxicity was minimal in both study arms. Three-year PFS after random assignment was 68% MR versus 33% OBS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.4; P = 4.4 x 10(-10) [all patients]) and 64% MR v 33% OBS (HR = 0.4; P = 9.2 x 10(-8) [patients with follicular lymphoma]). There was an advantage for MR regardless of Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index score, tumor burden, residual disease, or histology. In multivariate analysis of MR patients, minimal disease after CVP was a favorable prognostic factor. OS at 3 years was 92% MR versus 86% OBS (HR = 0.6; log-rank one-sided P = .05) and, among patients with follicular lymphoma, OS was 91% MR versus 86% (HR = 0.6; log-rank one-sided P = .08). A trend favoring MR was observed among patients with high tumor burden (log-rank one-sided P = .03).
The E1496 study provides the first phase III data in untreated indolent lymphoma that MR after chemotherapy significantly prolongs PFS.

Download full-text


Available from: Stanley R Frankel, May 21, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In international prognostic index (IPI) risk-tailored adult patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), it is still unclear whether the addition of maintenance rituximab (MR) improves progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), after RCHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) therapy. In our study, 207 patients (age: 21-59 years) received six 14-day cycles of RCHOP and gained overall response. After RCHOP, 98 patients were enrolled in the observation (OBS) arm. 109 patients continued to receive MR therapy. In IPI risk <2 profile, PFS at 5 years reached 72.9% (MR arm) versus 56% (OBS arm) (P = 0.033). In IPI risk ≥2 profile, PFS estimation at 5 years was 44.9% (MR arm) versus 33.5% (OBS arm) (P = 0.006). It is noteworthy that patients with IPI ≥2 who received MR achieved PFS similar to that for patients in the OBS arm with the IPI <2, 44.9% versus 56% (P = 0.97). In patients with an IPI <2, OS at 5 years was 83.2% (MR arm) versus 81.2% (OBS arm) (P = 0.708). In patients with an IPI ≥2, 5-year OS estimation was 44.6% (MR arm) versus 40.5% (OBS arm) (P = 0.067). Subgroup analysis of patients with an IPI ≥3 risk profile shows a survival benefit for patients receiving MR. OS at 5 years was 62% (MR arm) versus 49% (OBS arm), (P = 0.033). In conclusion, maintenance rituximab after RCHOP improves progression-free survival. In addition, overall survival is improved for patients with an IPI ≥3 risk profile receiving MR.
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 11/2011; 138(1):125-32. DOI:10.1007/s00432-011-1074-1 · 3.01 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The impact on health related quality of life (HRQoL) of rituximab maintenance (R-M) versus observation (OBS) after induction for treatment of follicular lymphoma (FL) is unclear. We reviewed the charts of 137 patients (53% female, 87% White, age 61.0 ± 12.4 years) who received either R-M (n = 53) or OBS (n = 84) after chemotherapy induction for newly diagnosed FL at community oncology practices within the US. Patients (65% with advanced disease; 48% with a high FLIPI score [3-5]) had completed ≥1 Patient Care Monitor HRQoL survey in the period following front-line therapy, and were excluded if they had progressed during front-line therapy. Linear mixed models showed that postinduction, most symptoms were stable, with patients on R-M reporting HRQoL that was equal to that reported by OBS patients. Among R-M patients, receipt of rituximab was associated with improved psychological symptoms.
    06/2011; 2(3):129-39. DOI:10.1177/2040620711407675
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Major advances have been made in the field of immunology in the past two decades. A better understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms controlling the immune system has opened the door to many innovative and promising new cancer therapies that manipulate the immune response. For instance, toll-like receptor agonists have been shown to boost immune responses toward tumors. Also, a wide array of cell-based immunotherapies utilizing T cells, NK cells, and dendritic cells have been established. Furthermore, a rapidly expanding repertoire of monoclonal antibodies is being developed to treat tumors, and many of the available antibodies have demonstrated impressive clinical responses. Here, we examine some of these immunotherapeutic approaches currently in use or testing to treat cancer, and we examine available evidence with regards to mechanism and efficacy of these treatments.
    European journal of pharmacology 10/2009; 625(1-3):41-54. DOI:10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.09.067 · 2.68 Impact Factor