Self-management improves outcomes in persons with limb loss.
ABSTRACT To test the acceptance and effectiveness of a community-based self-management (SM) intervention designed to improve outcomes after limb loss. A priori hypothesis was that an SM intervention will be more effective than standard support group activities in improving outcomes.
Randomized controlled trial.
Intervention (N=287) and control participants (N=235) with major limb loss.
Nine, 90-minute SM group sessions delivered by trained volunteer leaders. Retention rates at immediate postintervention and 6-month follow-up were 97% and 91% for the SM group.
Primary outcomes were depression, positive mood, and self-efficacy. Secondary outcomes were improved functional status and quality of life.
By using intent-to-treat analyses, the odds for being depressed are significantly lower for those in SM group, 50% less likely at treatment completion (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.3-0.9) and 40% less likely at the 6-month follow-up (95% CI=.03-1.1). Treatment completers have a 70% reduction in likelihood of being depressed at posttreatment (P<.01) and this persists at six months (P<.05). For those in the SM group, functional limitations were significantly lower at 6 months (P<.05), and general self-efficacy was significantly higher at immediate posttreatment (P<.05) and at 6 months (P<.05). Treatment completers have generally significantly larger effect sizes at all follow-up points. Pain intensity, self-efficacy for pain control, and quality of life were not significantly different between the groups. Subgroup analyses indicated the impact of the intervention was greater for participants who were less than 3 years postamputation, participants who were less than 65 years of age, or participants who showed at least 1 secondary condition at baseline.
The study provides evidence that SM interventions can improve the outcomes of persons with limb loss beyond benefits offered by support groups.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Little is known about the types of physical activities that older individuals with lower-limb loss perform, correlates of regular physical activity (PA), and barriers and facilitators to PA. We conducted an exploratory study in 158 older Veterans from the Pacific Northwest with a partial foot (35%), below-knee (39%) and above-knee (26%) amputation. Ninety-eight percent of survey respondents were male, on average 65 yr of age and 15 yr postamputation; 36% of amputations were trauma-related. The most commonly reported physical activities were muscle strengthening (42%), yard work and/or gardening (30%), and bicycling (11%). Forty-three percent were classified as physically active based on weekly moderate- and vigorous-intensity PA. History of vigorous preamputation PA was positively associated with being active, while low wealth and watching ≥5 h/d of television/videos were inversely associated. While pain- and resource-related barriers to PA were most frequently reported, only knowledge-related and interest/motivation-related barriers were inversely associated with being active. Family support and financial assistance to join a gym were the most commonly reported factors that would facilitate PA. To increase PA in the older amputee population, interventions should address motivational issues, knowledge gaps, and television watching; reduce financial barriers to exercising; and consider involving family members.The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 01/2014; 51(6):895-906. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2013.06.0152 · 1.69 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Self-efficacy plays an important role in symptom management and may be predictive of perceived cognitive impairment (PCI) for individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). The primary aim of this study was to determine if self-efficacy longitudinally predicts two types of PCI in MS: general cognitive functioning and executive functioning. The secondary aim was to assess whether self-efficacy mediates the relationships between depression, fatigue, and PCI.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 01/2015; 96(5). DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2015.01.008 · 2.44 Impact Factor
Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 10/2013; 56:e145-e146. DOI:10.1016/j.rehab.2013.07.305