Pay-off selection criteria for quality and improvement initiatives

International Journal of Quality &amp Reliability Management 04/2008; 25(4):366-382. DOI: 10.1108/02656710810865258

ABSTRACT Purpose – The variety of possible quality management (QM) and continuous improvement (CI) initiatives and their various possible permutations can make it difficult for a company to choose the best approach for their requirements. This paper aims to address the selection issue by presenting a method to compare popular QM and CI initiatives from the perspective of the pay-offs, or expected benefits, to an organisation which successfully adopts the approach. Design/methodology/approach – The relevant QM and CI literature was analysed, examining key initiatives and their reported pay-offs to the organisation. A matrix diagram approach is introduced which presents the extent and credibility of arguments advanced for these initiatives, in seven categories of pay-off. A system of assessment is proposed, which quantifies the extent and weight of empirical evidence and estimates the strength of the claim for each pay-off. Findings – The pay-off matrix summarises the claims in each of the pay-off categories, assesses their credibility, and displays the similarities and differences for six key initiatives: total quality management, six sigma, ISO 9000, business process reengineering, lean and business excellence. Graphical pay-off profiles are presented. Significant differences between the claimed pay-offs for these initiatives are identified, analysed and discussed. Research limitations/implications – The proposed matrix and assessment system attempts to support a comprehensive and rational approach to assess the pay-offs of QM and CI initiatives. As with any analysis of literature, there is inevitably an element of selection, but this approach consciously attempts to avoid omission and promote objectivity. The analysis is based on articles published between 1990 and 2005. Hence, new research and additional evidence may change the weight and credibility of claims. Originality/value – This paper suggests a way in which evidence from the literature might be most effectively used by managers for decision support in the choice of quality and improvement initiatives. A similar approach might also be used for other areas, where businesses face choices and a considerable body of evidence exists to assist the decision-making process.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose – This paper aims to achieve a better understanding of the dissemination and adoption of quality management in China, in the context of theory on management trends and fashions, dissemination and adoption. Design/methodology/approach – Following a literature review, the research adopts a qualitative, multiple case-study approach, based on the study of six Shanghai manufacturers. Findings – A dissemination and adoption model is presented, which contains nine observed dissemination and adoption factors. These factors and their relationships are identified, analysed and discussed. Research limitations/implications – The selection of case study companies was constrained by practical considerations of location and access. Further constraints of time and resource meant that only 14 interviews with managers from case-study companies and three interviews with quality experts and consultants were conducted. Practical implications – The findings will be of interest to those involved in developing QM within China, or working with Chinese manufacturing partners. They suggest that Chinese businesses do not blindly adopt QM initiatives simply because they are the current trend or fashion – instead, companies make decisions based on several rational adoption factors. Originality/value – The research contributes to a richer understanding of the dissemination and adoption of QM in China, and extends understanding of QM dissemination in the context of management fashion and dissemination theories, using a qualitative approach.
    International Journal of Quality &amp Reliability Management 10/2010; 27(9):1067-1081.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is a myriad of improvement initiatives that can be used to continually improve an organisation's performance. `Improvement initiatives' refers herein to approaches, systems, tools and/or techniques and include, for example: Six Sigma, Lean, Business Process Reengineering, ISO9001, Balanced Scorecard or benchmarking. Unfortunately, there is a relatively lack of advice or guidance available to organisations on how to select the most appropriate improvement initiative for a given context or situation. This paper discusses key issues relating to the selection of appropriate improvement initiatives within organisations, and proposes an initial guidance model that is designed to assist organisations in selecting suitable improvement initiatives. The proposed model focuses on the steps to select a suitable initiative, which provides a structured process towards making a rational decision. This model was developed based on an extensive literature review and several semi-structured interviews. The interviews were conducted in New Zealand and Malaysia involving: (1) Directors and Senior Managers from the quality or business excellence (BE) areas of organisations that have won a national Quality or BE Award; (2) Chief Executive Officers and Executives from national custodians of Quality / BE award; and (3) Consultants specialising in quality management and BE.
    Computers and Industrial Engineering (CIE), 2010 40th International Conference on; 08/2010
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to review critical success factors (CSFs) of total quality management (TQM), and to rank these in the Indian manufacturing industry. Design/methodology/approach – To rank the CSFs, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was used. The data were collected using questionnaires as the research instrument. Findings – Process management, top management leadership and customer focus are the top three factors for implementation of TQM in the manufacturing industry in India. Quality citizenship is a relatively low-ranked factor. Practical limitations/implications – The findings will be useful in successful implementation of TQM in developing countries like India. Further research may be carried out into the CSFs in different national contexts. Originality/value – The paper is the first to make use of TOPSIS approach to rank the CSFs of TQM.
    Asian Journal on Quality. 01/2011; 12(1):124-138.