[Withdrawal of assisted ventilation in the home: Making decisions in paediatric palliative care.]

Unidad de Cuidados Paliativos Pediátricos, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, España. Electronic address: .
Anales de Pediatría (Impact Factor: 0.83). 06/2013;
Source: PubMed


End-of-life care is of growing interest in Paediatrics. The number of children with diseases being treated using high-technology as palliative treatment has also increased. The creation of multidisciplinary care teams with 24/7hours home care may prevent prolonged hospital stays in these patients. To adapt the treatment in order to avoid new hospital admissions and to obtain a better quality of life is a desirable objective. The taking of decisions and subsequent withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in the home is presented, along with the underlying disease and the acute event that led to the worsening of the patient. The decision-making and clinical management until the death of the patient is then discussed and reviewed.

Download full-text


Available from: Alberto García-Salido, Feb 11, 2015
20 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To analyze mortality and resource consumption in patients with long stays in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). A retrospective, descriptive case series study. Medical-surgical PICU in a third level hospital. Data were collected from patients with a stay of 28 days or more in PICU between 2006 and 2010. Of the 2118 patients assisted in this period, 83 (3.9%) required prolonged stay. Morbidity-mortality and resource consumption among patients with prolonged stay in the PICU. Mortality was higher in patients with a long stay (22.9%) than in the rest of patients (2%) (p<0.001). In 52.6% of these patients, death occurred after withdrawal of treatment or after not starting resuscitation measures. Patients with prolonged stay showed a high incidence of nosocomial infection (96.3%) and an important consumption of healthcare resources (97.6% required conventional mechanical ventilation, 90.2% required transfusion of blood products, 86.7% required intravenous vasoactive drugs and 22.9% required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]). Critical children with prolonged stay in the PICU show important morbidity and mortality, and an important consumption of healthcare resources. The adoption of specific measures permitting early identification of patients at risk of prolonged stay is needed in order to adapt therapeutic measures and available resources, and to improve treatment efficiency.
    Medicina Intensiva 05/2011; 35(7):417-23. DOI:10.1016/j.medine.2011.04.002 · 1.34 Impact Factor
  • Journal of Palliative Medicine 02/2001; 4(4):519-24. DOI:10.1089/109662101753381692 · 1.91 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Compassionate home extubation for pediatric patients is a topic that seldom appears in the literature and is of unknown clinical importance. However, standards in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and among pediatric critical care physicians regarding end-of-life decisions are changing, including where and when patient extubation occurs. The authors' hospice recently consulted on an infant with spinal muscular atrophy in the PICU requiring mechanical ventilation, for whom further life-sustaining care was deemed futile. In consultation with the family, nursing staff, physicians, and the ethics committee, and following protocol guidelines, arrangements were made for this infant and his parents to be transported home. Once comfortable with his family, a small amount of lorazepam was given and the endotracheal tube removed. The infant died quietly about 20 minutes later. This case prompted the authors to review the current state of published articles covering this topic, suggest a protocol for implementing home extubation, realize imposed barriers, and discuss potential solutions. A well-developed plan for home extubation procedures may improve interactions with PICU and hospice services and at the same time provide additional choices for parents and patients wishing to maximize end-of-life quality outside the hospital setting.
    American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine 05/2006; 23(3):224-8. DOI:10.1177/1049909106289085 · 1.38 Impact Factor
Show more