Article

The effects of cage-diving activities on the fine-scale swimming behaviour and space use of white sharks

Journal of Marine Biology 06/2013; 160(11). DOI: 10.1007/s00227-013-2277-6

ABSTRACT Wildlife tourism has become increasingly popular and is one of the fastest growing sectors of the tourism industry. A radio-acoustic positioning system was deployed to monitor the fine-scale movements of 21 white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) and investigate the effects of shark cage-diving activities on their swimming behaviour and space use. This study contributes towards improving our understanding of the complex relationship between wildlife tourism and its effects on sharks, and assesses how tourism targeting sharks affects behaviour at a finer spatial scale than previously investigated. Our study demonstrated that shark cage-diving operators (SCDO) influenced the fine-scale three-dimensional spatial distribution and the rate of movement of white sharks at the Neptune Islands. White sharks stayed more than 30 m away from the SCDO on 21 % of the days detected, but spent a significant amount of time in close proximity to the SCDO on the remaining days. Individual variation was detected, with some sharks behaviourally responding to SCDO more than others. The degree of variation between individual sharks and the different levels of interaction (e.g. presence, proximity to SCDO, and consumption of tethered bait) highlights the complexity of the relationships between SCDO and the effects on sharks. To improve our understanding of these relationships, future monitoring of shark cage-diving operations requires proximity to SCDO to be recorded in addition to the presence within the area. Further work is needed to assess whether the observed behavioural changes would affect individual fitness and ultimately population viability, which are critical information to unambiguously assess the potential impacts of wildlife tourism targeting sharks.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Charlie Huveneers, Sep 04, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
317 Views
 · 
348 Downloads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: White sharks are a listed threatened species in several regions of the world including the United States, South Africa, Malta, Namibia, New Zealand and Australia, as well as being listed on Appendix II of the Convention for International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) and under the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS). In Australian waters, white sharks have been protected since 1996 and a National Recovery Plan was established in 2002 and reviewed in 2009. The primary objective of this Plan is to recover white shark numbers in Australian waters to a level that will see the species removed from the threatened species schedules under Australian legislation. However, there are no currently reliable estimates of population size or trend and thus no measure of whether recovery actions to date have been effective. A lack of scientifically credible information on population status is one of the key issues limiting the efficacy of conservation efforts for the species in Australian waters because the impacts of current recovery efforts cannot be adequately assessed. In addition, there are regular statements about increasing or decreasing shark numbers that cannot be confirmed or refuted due to a lack of useful data. These statements are popularised by the media, serve to confuse the public and policy makers, and risk actions by Government that may be ill-advised as to the true status of the species. CSIRO has carried out a tagging program on juvenile white sharks in the region each year since 2007. The purpose of the program is to establish the patterns of residency and habitat use by juvenile white sharks when they are present in the region and contribute information on the overall movement and population dynamics of juvenile white sharks along the east coast of Australia. Strategic objectives are to determine the survival rate of juveniles, the survival rate of adults and, in conjunction with aerial surveys, provide estimates of abundance of juveniles – all of which will contribute to a population model and an analysis of population status for the species in eastern Australia. This report details the outcomes of the 2012 juvenile white shark survey program as part of this strategic objective under combined funding from the Hunter-Central Rivers Catchment Management Authority (HCRCMA), CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research (CMAR) and the University of Technology – Sydney (UTS). This report combines the results of HCRCMA projects HCR11-422 (Acoustic tracking of juvenile white sharks in the HCRCMA region) and HCR11-423 (Aerial surveys of juvenile white sharks in the HCRCMA region). The patterns of movement and residency of satellite and acoustic tagged juvenile white sharks in the Port Stephens area during 2012–2013 was consistent to that observed during previous years. The mean estimated residency period to the nursery area was approximately 70 days. During this period of residency, sharks occupied various habitats including deeper areas out to mid-shelf depths, island habitats, periods inside the Port Stephens estuary and residency near to the surf zone. On average, sharks recorded approximately 20% of their nursery area residency time near to the surf zone of Bennett’s Beach. This near surf zone residency during 2012–2013 was lower than previously estimated for the same beach in 2010–2011 (36.5 %) and may indicate a degree of interannual variability in this parameter or an interannual variability in individual beach use. The latter is also indicated by both aerial survey data and vessel-based observations which suggest a difference between the abundance of sharks between years on individual beaches. Several tagged sharks spent relatively short but significant periods inside Port Stephens estuary (the bay) and sharks were detected at all bay receivers including off Corlette, approximately 7.5 km inside the heads. Sharks were most frequently detected on the northern side of the bay in the vicinity of Jimmy’s Beach. This indicates that habitat use within the bay is significant albeit at a much lower level to habitat outside the bay. The aerial surveys indicated that although there is a seasonal signal to the presence of juvenile white sharks in the Port Stephens nursery area, sharks may occur in the area at any time of the year. Corrected estimates indicate that up to approximately 250 juvenile white sharks may have been present in the nursery area on survey days with peak abundances occurring in October-November as has been previously observed for the region. This study provides further confirmation that the Port Stephens region is a key nursery area for juvenile white sharks in eastern Australia. Continuing an integrated tagging and aerial survey program as well as further refinement of the correction factors applied to aerial survey data is recommended so that juvenile abundance and survival rates can be estimated. These data can then be incorporated into population models to effectively monitor the status of the species.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This report provides a summary of information on the implementation and evaluation of three methods for estimating residency of white sharks (Carcharadon carcharias) to monitor relationships with cage-diving tourism activities at the Neptune Islands Group marine Park. http://pir.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/256907/White_Shark_Neptune_Islands_Report_-_FINAL.pdf
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Shark tourism is a popular but controversial activity. We obtained insights into this industry via a global e-mailed questionnaire completed by 45 diving/snorkelling operators who advertised shark experiences (shark operators) and 49 who did not (non-shark operators). 42% of shark operators used an attractant to lure sharks and 93% stated they had a formal code of conduct which 86% enforced “very strictly”. While sharks were reported to normally ignore people, 9 operators had experienced troublesome behaviour from them. Whilst our research corroborates previous studies indicating minimal risk to humans from most shark encounters, a precautionary approach to provisioning is required to avoid potential ecological and societal effects of shark tourism. Codes of conduct should always stipulate acceptable diver behaviour and appropriate diver numbers and shark operators should have a moral responsibility to educate their customers about the need for shark conservation.
    Marine Pollution Bulletin 01/2015; 91(1). DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.12.004 · 2.79 Impact Factor