Imitative behavior: Network antecedents and performance consequences

Advances in Strategic Management (Impact Factor: 0.32). 07/2008; 25:531-560. DOI: 10.1016/S0742-3322(08)25015-1


Organizational networks are generally considered major antecedents of mutual influence in adopting similar practices, typically via a structure of dense ties, or closure. We propose that under conditions of competitive interdependence, closure may be associated with links established to access resources and knowledge and become a possible source of differentiation rather than imitation. We test these and other antecedents of imitative behavior and performance in the Italian TV industry with 12 years of data on 501 productions. We find that network closure is associated with lower imitation, centrality, but not status, leads to imitation, and that imitation lowers performance.

18 Reads
  • Source
    • "Second, we use the network visualization software tool Najojo (see the appendix) to add firm labels to the nodes and connect the nodes based on the number of partnerships among the firms in IBM's ego network. 4. We note, however, that the performance consequences of imitation are likely contingent on the specific nature of the cooperative environment, see e.g., Soda et al. (2008). 5. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We discuss the 'gloomy' side of firms' embeddedness in networks of inter- firm partnerships. We propose a nested understanding of the effects of three levels of overembeddedness - environmental, inter-organizational and dyadic overembeddedness - on subsequent inter-firm partnership formation and argue for a joint examination of these three levels and their interactions over time. As a whole, increases in firms' embeddedness will generate decreasing returns to the firms involved, prompting (i) the search for and attachment to novel partners and (ii) the dissolution of extant partnerships. On the flipside, overembeddedness thus sparks network evolution - by cueing firms to look beyond their embedded partnerships.
    Advances in Strategic Management 07/2008; 25. DOI:10.1016/S0742-3322(08)25014-X · 0.32 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the network strategy view, relative competitive advantage stems not merely from opportunity structures embedded in networks but also from the distribution of ability and motivation among firms. Thus, there is a need to “bring the firm back in” to the network strategy narrative. We demonstrate that a mixed-methods design, blending large-sample data with micro-data on specific firms and their networks, can increase our understanding of the interplay of network structure and actor mechanisms, thus bridging the chasm between theory and practice in network strategy. We believe this is a critical step toward the “strategic design of networks.”
    Advances in Strategic Management 07/2008; 25:457-501. DOI:10.1016/S0742-3322(08)25013-8 · 0.32 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dyadic multi-dimensionality informs the variation that exists within and between network ties and suggests that ties are not all the same and not all equally strategic. This chapter presents a model of dyadic evolution grounded in dyadic multi-dimensionality and framed within actor-level, dyadic-level, endogenous, and exogenous contexts. These contexts generate both strategic catalysts that motivate network action and bounded agency that may constrain such network action. Assuming the need to navigate within bounded agency, the model highlights three strategic processes that demonstrate how dyadic multi-dimensionality underlies the evolution of strategic network ties.
    Advances in Strategic Management 07/2008; 25:133-170. DOI:10.1016/S0742-3322(08)25004-7 · 0.32 Impact Factor
Show more


18 Reads