Maternity leave and the employment of new mothers in the United States

Journal of Population Economics (Impact Factor: 0.92). 06/2004; 17(2):331-349. DOI: 10.1007/s00148-003-0159-9
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT We use data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth to examine the relationships between maternity leave coverage and U.S. women’s post-birth leave taking and employment decisions from 1988 to 1996. We find that women who were employed before birth are working much more quickly post-birth than women who were not. We also find that, among mothers who were employed pre-birth, those in jobs that provided leave coverage are more likely to take a leave of up to 12 weeks, but return more quickly after 12 weeks. Our results suggest that maternity leave coverage is related to leave taking, as well as the length of time that a new mother stays home after a birth. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2004

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper, comparable surveys from 1994 to 2008 are used to show that two geographically and culturally connected nations, Canada and the United States (US), have starkly contrasting violence rates among children and youth and that this cross-country violence gap has emerged among those as young as 2 years old for hitting, 4 years old for bullying, and 12 years old for fighting. Such early life differences remain important as children grow up. The US-Canada violence gaps do not appear to reduce as personal and family characteristics are adjusted for, for example, race, family structure, poverty, and region. Policies in areas most relevant for childhood development, including maternity or parental leave, health care, and child care, are compared across the two countries to identify potential areas where more attention may be paid to improve children’s outcomes.
    Child Indicators Research 01/2014; DOI:10.1007/s12187-014-9234-x · 0.96 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is speculation that some single poor mothers rely on welfare during maternity leaves from work. A related literature on paid family leave (PFL) policies, wage replacement programs to support caregiving including maternity leave, cites the potential for PFL programs to reduce welfare reliance. Yet there is little evidence of the use of welfare during a maternity-related job interruption or the potential impact on family resources if PFL benefits are substituted for cash welfare. This article considers the characteristics, pre-and postentry employment patterns, and the substitution of PFL benefits for cash welfare for a cohort of 293 "new-mother" welfare participants who entered Wisconsin's Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program in the fall of 2006. The author used 2006 administrative data from Wisconsin on earnings and public assistance, as well as participation and benefit rules from three state PFL programs, to examine whether new-mother welfare participants use welfare during maternity leave from work and if they would better off with PFL benefits. Results indicated that a substantial minority use the program as a short-term resource during maternity leave from work. Moreover, most would be better off with welfare benefits, although the most consistent workers would receive similar amounts from both programs.
    Social work research 01/2013; 37(4):375-387. DOI:10.1093/swr/svt033 · 0.88 Impact Factor
  • Source
    07/2013; , ISBN: 9781406427752