Article

Effectiveness of natural and synthetic blocking reagents and their application for detecting food allergens in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

Department of Agrobiotechnology, IFA-Tulln, Center for Analytical Chemistry, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences Vienna, Tulln an der Donau, Austria.
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (impact factor: 3.78). 03/2009; 394(2):539-48. DOI:10.1007/s00216-009-2698-8 pp.539-48
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Blocking is an important step before an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) can be performed. It reduces non-specific binding to the microtiter plate to a minimum. For detecting food allergens by means of ELISA, the problem with protein blocking solutions is obvious. The blocker might interfere with the antibodies of the assay and leads to false positive results. Therefore, other blocking solutions are greatly needed. There are some alternatives like synthetic blockers or carbohydrates. Comparisons of these different blocking agents, namely proteins, carbohydrates, and synthetic blockers, were made at different reaction conditions. The incubation periods and temperatures were varied, as well as the pH. The best combinations were evaluated and compared, in respect of their blocking efficiency. The two best non-proteinaceous blockers, i.e. polyvinylalcohol and Ficoll, were subsequently applied to ELISA tests for the determination of alpha-casein and peanut. The study showed that Ficoll and PVA did as well as BSA in buffer solution. Therefore, they can be considered as alternative blocking reagents for ELISA, especially for the detection of food allergens.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
39 Views

Keywords

alternatives
 
blocker
 
Blocking
 
blocking efficiency
 
blocking solutions
 
buffer solution
 
Comparisons
 
detecting food allergens
 
ELISA
 
ELISA tests
 
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
 
false positive results
 
Ficoll
 
food allergens
 
incubation periods
 
non-specific binding
 
PVA
 
solutions
 
synthetic blockers