Article

Nondaily, light daily, and moderate-to-heavy cigarette smokers in a rural area of Egypt: a population-based survey.

Department of Community, Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Nicotine & Tobacco Research (Impact Factor: 2.81). 03/2009; 11(2):134-8. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntp016
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Understanding tobacco use among nondaily and light daily cigarette smokers is needed because they are dissimilar from other smokers and may require specific prevention efforts.
We compared three groups of adult male smokers in rural Egypt: light daily and nondaily smokers versus moderate-to-heavy daily smokers. Data were obtained from a household survey in 2003 in six randomly selected villages in the Nile Delta region of Egypt. There were 7,657 adult participants, of whom 48.6% were male and 51.4% were female. Among them, 1,401 males (37.6%) and 5 females (0.1%) were self-identified as current cigarette smokers; further analysis focused on males. We restricted data analysis to those who reported a stable pattern of 3+ years of smoking. There were 42 nondaily smokers. Daily smokers were subdivided into two groups: light daily smokers (who smoked no more than 10 cigarettes/day; n = 223) and moderate-to-heavy daily smokers (who smoked at least 11 cigarettes/day; n = 769).
We found statistically significant differences between these groups on nearly every measure: nondaily smokers tended to be younger and unmarried, but they also had higher levels of education and professional occupations compared with the other smokers. Nondaily and the light daily smokers were more likely than moderate-to-heavy smokers to be planning to quit and to have self-efficacy for quitting, and they were less likely to be smoking in the presence of their wife and children at home.
Further understanding of nondaily and light daily smokers may aid in tailoring specific interventions.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Maged El-Setouhy, Jun 29, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
116 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Egypt, data on the national prevalence of cigarette and waterpipe smoking are lacking, yet such data are vital to tobacco control efforts. We designed and implemented a sampling method to generate population-based prevalence estimates for tobacco smoking in Egypt. In 2005, a total of 3369 adults ages 18 and above, including 1867 females and 1502 males, participated in the survey. Among males, the national prevalence of former cigarette smoking was 18.1%, and 27.5% reported current smoking. Exclusive current waterpipe smoking was reported by 7.2% of adult males, and a further 3.4% reported smoking both waterpipes and cigarettes. Tobacco smoking was rarely reported by females; among them the national prevalence of current cigarette smoking was 0.3%. This study produced the first robust estimate of the national prevalence of cigarette and waterpipe smoking in Egypt based on a rigorous probability sample. Along with the more recent Global Adult Tobacco Survey, carried out by the World Health Organization in 2009, the results will be useful in assessing smoking trends in Egypt and in evaluating the impacts of recent tobacco control laws. Keywords Egypt, Smoking, Tobacco, Waterpipe, Shisha, Survey
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Few studies have assessed differences between intermittent and light smokers, particularly among young adults. Exploring these differences promotes a systematic approach to research and treatment in low-level smokers. This study explored demographic, tobacco-related, and psychosocial predictors of intermittent nondaily smoking relative to light smoking among basic military training (BMT) recruits. The impact of smoking status on abstinence rates at follow-up was also assessed. Participants were 5,603 U.S. Air Force BMT intermittent nondaily (n = 3,134) or light daily (n = 2,469) smoking recruits participating in a population-based group randomized trial targeting tobacco use prevention and cessation (Klesges et al., 2006, Efficacy of a tailored tobacco control program on long-term use in a population of U.S. military troops. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 295-306.). Participants completed baseline measures assessing demographics; tobacco use and history; and common social, attitudinal, and behavioral risk factors for tobacco use. Flights of recruits were randomly assigned to a tobacco use intervention or health education control intervention. At the 1-year follow-up, participants reported 7-day point prevalence and continuous abstinence. Intermittent nondaily smoking relative to light daily smoking was associated with lesser perceived addiction, intermittent and daily use of smokeless tobacco, nonsmoking male and female heads of household, lesser likelihood of smoking while stressed or while bored, and higher likelihood of intentions to quit smoking. Intermittent smokers were significantly more likely than light daily smokers to report abstinence at follow-up. Intermittent and daily light smokers differ on several tobacco-related and psychosocial variables. Attending to these factors in prevention and cessation programs may enhance abstinence in both groups.
    Nicotine & Tobacco Research 03/2010; 12(5):465-73. DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntq025 · 2.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare five alternative self-report methods for assessing the smoking status of Chinese urban residents, and to estimate their reliability or agreement. Cross-sectional survey with multistage sampling. Cross-sectional survey data were collected from residents in two Chinese cities, and the prevalence of smoking and smoking frequency were estimated by means of six methods of self-report labelled SMD, SM1, SM6, SMF, SMC and SM. SM, the method of smoking assessment endorsed by the World Health Organisation (WHO), served as a referent in estimating agreement among the domestic methods. Cohen's kappa measured overall intermethod agreement. Data on 1167 eligible respondents were analysed. kappa values ranged from 0.79 to 0.89 for current smoking, from 0.84 to 0.94 for daily smoking, and from 0.23 to 0.62 for occasional smoking. Compared with the referent (SM, 61%), SMD (53%), SM1 (57%), SM6 (54%) and SMC (55%) significantly understated the prevalence of current smoking among Chinese urban residents. SM1 (11%), SM6 (10%), SMD (6%) and SMC (6%) significantly understated the prevalence of occasional smoking compared with the refererent (SM, 14%). No variation emerged in prevalence estimates of daily smoking. Despite some variability, the five domestic methods used to assess smoking status in China generally produced similar results to those based on SM, the method advocated by WHO. Discrepancies between domestic assessment methods peaked in estimating the prevalence of occasional smoking.
    Public health 08/2010; 124(8):437-43. DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2010.04.005 · 1.48 Impact Factor