Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: atlas selection and its effect on accuracy.

Visual Information Processing Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, 180 Queen's Gate, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
NeuroImage (Impact Factor: 6.25). 03/2009; 46(3):726-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.018
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Quantitative research in neuroimaging often relies on anatomical segmentation of human brain MR images. Recent multi-atlas based approaches provide highly accurate structural segmentations of the brain by propagating manual delineations from multiple atlases in a database to a query subject and combining them. The atlas databases which can be used for these purposes are growing steadily. We present a framework to address the consequent problems of scale in multi-atlas segmentation. We show that selecting a custom subset of atlases for each query subject provides more accurate subcortical segmentations than those given by non-selective combination of random atlas subsets. Using a database of 275 atlases, we tested an image-based similarity criterion as well as a demographic criterion (age) in a leave-one-out cross-validation study. Using a custom ranking of the database for each subject, we combined a varying number n of atlases from the top of the ranked list. The resulting segmentations were compared with manual reference segmentations using Dice overlap. Image-based selection provided better segmentations than random subsets (mean Dice overlap 0.854 vs. 0.811 for the estimated optimal subset size, n=20). Age-based selection resulted in a similar marked improvement. We conclude that selecting atlases from large databases for atlas-based brain image segmentation improves the accuracy of the segmentations achieved. We show that image similarity is a suitable selection criterion and give results based on selecting atlases by age that demonstrate the value of meta-information for selection.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Identification of error in non-rigid registration is a critical problem in the medical image processing community. We recently proposed an algorithm that we call "Assessing Quality Using Image Registration Circuits" (AQUIRC) to identify non-rigid registration errors and have tested its performance using simulated cases. In this article, we extend our previous work to assess AQUIRC's ability to detect local non-rigid registration errors and validate it quantitatively at specific clinical landmarks, namely the Anterior Commissure (AC) and the Posterior Commissure (PC). To test our approach on a representative range of error we utilize 5 different registration methods and use 100 target images and 9 atlas images. Our results show that AQUIRC's measure of registration quality correlates with the true target registration error (TRE) at these selected landmarks with an R² = 0.542. To compare our method to a more conventional approach, we compute Local Normalized Correlation Coefficient (LNCC) and show that AQUIRC performs similarly. However, a multi-linear regression performed with both AQUIRC's measure and LNCC shows a higher correlation with TRE than correlations obtained with either measure alone, thus showing the complementarity of these quality measures. We conclude the article by showing that the AQUIRC algorithm can be used to reduce registration errors for all five algorithms.
    IEEE transactions on medical imaging. 07/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Automatic and reliable segmentation of subcortical structures is an important but difficult task in quantitative brain image analysis. Multi-atlas based segmentation methods have attracted great interest due to their promising performance. Under the multi-atlas based segmentation framework, using deformation fields generated for registering atlas images onto a target image to be segmented, labels of the atlases are first propagated to the target image space and then fused to get the target image segmentation based on a label fusion strategy. While many label fusion strategies have been developed, most of these methods adopt predefined weighting models that are not necessarily optimal. In this study, we propose a novel local label learning strategy to estimate the target image's segmentation label using statistical machine learning techniques. In particular, we use a L1-regularized support vector machine (SVM) with a k nearest neighbor (kNN) based training sample selection strategy to learn a classifier for each of the target image voxel from its neighboring voxels in the atlases based on both image intensity and texture features. Our method has produced segmentation results consistently better than state-of-the-art label fusion methods in validation experiments on hippocampal segmentation of over 100 MR images obtained from publicly available and in-house datasets. Volumetric analysis has also demonstrated the capability of our method in detecting hippocampal volume changes due to Alzheimer's disease. Hum Brain Mapp 35:2674–2697, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Human Brain Mapping 06/2014; 35(6). · 6.88 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Due to rapid advances in radiation therapy (RT), especially image guidance and treatment adaptation, a fast and accurate segmentation of medical images is a very important part of the treatment. Manual delineation of target volumes and organs at risk is still the standard routine for most clinics, even though it is time consuming and prone to intra- and interobserver variations. Automated segmentation methods seek to reduce delineation workload and unify the organ boundary definition. In this paper, the authors review the current autosegmentation methods particularly relevant for applications in RT. The authors outline the methods' strengths and limitations and propose strategies that could lead to wider acceptance of autosegmentation in routine clinical practice. The authors conclude that currently, autosegmentation technology in RT planning is an efficient tool for the clinicians to provide them with a good starting point for review and adjustment. Modern hardware platforms including GPUs allow most of the autosegmentation tasks to be done in a range of a few minutes. In the nearest future, improvements in CT-based autosegmentation tools will be achieved through standardization of imaging and contouring protocols. In the longer term, the authors expect a wider use of multimodality approaches and better understanding of correlation of imaging with biology and pathology.
    Medical Physics 05/2014; 41(5):050902. · 2.91 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 3, 2014