Article

Air Pollution and Risk of Stroke Underestimation of Effect Due to Misclassification of Time of Event Onset

Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research Unit, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) (Impact Factor: 6.18). 02/2009; 20(1):137-42. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818ef34a
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Epidemiologic studies linking ambient air pollution to the onset of acute cardiovascular events often rely on date of hospital admission for exposure assessment.
We investigated the extent of exposure misclassification resulting from assigning exposure to particulate matter based on (1) date of hospital admission, or (2) time of hospital presentation compared with particulate matter exposure based on time of stroke symptom onset. We performed computer simulations to evaluate the impact of this source of exposure misclassification on estimates of air pollution health effects in the context of a time-stratified case-crossover study.
Among 1101 patients admitted for a confirmed acute ischemic stroke to a Boston area hospital, symptom onset occurred a median of 1 calendar day before hospital admission (range = 0-30 days). The difference between ambient particulate matter exposure based on the calendar day of admission versus time of symptom onset ranged from -47 to 36 microg/m3 (-0.1 +/- 7.1 microg/m3; mean +/- SD). The simulation study indicated that for nonnull associations, exposure assessment based on hospitalization date led to estimates that were biased toward the null by 60%-66%, whereas assessment based on time of hospital presentation yielded estimates that were biased toward the null by 37%-42%.
Epidemiologic studies of air pollution-related risk of acute cardiovascular events that assess exposure based on date of hospitalization likely underestimate the strength of associations. Using data on time of hospital presentation would marginally attenuate, but not eliminate, this important source of bias.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Helen H Suh, Jul 03, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
102 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To inform family physicians about the health effects of air pollution and to provide an approach to counseling vulnerable patients in order to reduce exposure. MEDLINE was searched using terms relevant to air pollution and its adverse effects. We reviewed English-language articles published from January 2008 to December 2009. Most studies provided level II evidence. Outdoor air pollution causes substantial morbidity and mortality in Canada. It can affect both the respiratory system (exacerbating asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and the cardiovascular system (triggering arrhythmias, cardiac failure, and stroke). The Air Quality Health Index (AQHI) is a new communication tool developed by Health Canada and Environment Canada that indicates the level of health risk from air pollution on a scale of 1 to 10. The AQHI is widely reported in the media, and the tool might be of use to family physicians in counseling high-risk patients (such as those with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or cardiac failure) to reduce exposure to outdoor air pollution. Family physicians can use the AQHI and its health messages to teach patients with asthma and other high-risk patients how to reduce health risks from air pollution.
    Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien 08/2011; 57(8):881-7, e280-7. · 1.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Epidemiologic studies indicate an association between airborne particulate matter and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms require further investigation. This review examines insights derived from large animal inhalation studies on systemic and coronary hemodynamic function and susceptibility to cardiac arrhythmias. We present evidence of acute cardiovascular alterations in chronically instrumented or anesthetized large animals exposed to concentrated ambient particles. Significant changes were observed in a number of clinically relevant variables. These included elevations in arterial blood pressure and reductions in myocardial perfusion during coronary occlusion that resulted in the exacerbation of ischemic parameters, such as ST-segment elevation and vasoconstriction. The involvement of sympathetic nerve activity was implicated by the fact that alpha-adrenergic blockade with prazosin significantly blunted the vasoconstrictor effects. Alterations in baroreceptor function during air particulate exposure were also substantial. Enhanced susceptibility to both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias was demonstrated. These studies with clinically relevant large animal models underscore the importance of the role of air particulate pollution in inducing adverse effects on cardiovascular function and warrant further exploration of specific components of air pollution as well as the physiologic triggers that lead to cardiovascular events. New clinically applicable research tools have evolved, particularly heart rate turbulence, a noninvasive measure of baroreceptor function, and T-wave alternans, an index of susceptibility to life-threatening arrhythmias, which can be employed clinically to evaluate the impact of air pollution on cardiovascular risk. KeywordsMyocardial ischemia–Myocardial infarction–Sudden cardiac death–Atrial fibrillation–Cardiac arrhythmias–Hypertension–Autonomic nervous system
    Air Quality Atmosphere & Health 01/2011; 4(1):53-63. DOI:10.1007/s11869-010-0091-6 · 1.46 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous studies have reported increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) after increases in ambient particulate matter (PM) air pollution concentrations in the hours and days before MI onset. We hypothesized that acute increases in fine PM with aerodynamic diameter < or = 2.5 microm (PM(2.5)) may be associated with increased risk of MI and that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and diabetes may increase susceptibility to PM(2.5). We also explored whether both transmural and nontransmural infarctions were acutely associated with ambient PM(2.5) concentrations. We studied all hospital admissions from 2004 through 2006 for first acute MI of adult residents of New Jersey who lived within 10 km of a PM(2.5) monitoring site (n = 5,864), as well as ambient measurements of PM(2.5), nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, and ozone. Using a time-stratified case-crossover design and conditional logistic regression showed that each interquartile-range increase in PM(2.5) concentration (10.8 microg/m3) in the 24 hr before arriving at the emergency department for MI was not associated with MI overall but was associated with an increased relative risk of a transmural infarction. We found no association between the same increase in PM(2.5) and nontransmural infarction. Further, subjects with COPD appeared to be particularly susceptible, but those with diabetes were not. This PM-transmural infarction association is consistent with earlier studies of PM and MI. The lack of association with nontransmural infarction suggests that future studies that investigate the triggering of MI by ambient PM(2.5) concentrations should be stratified by infarction type.
    Environmental Health Perspectives 04/2010; 118(9):1229-34. DOI:10.1289/ehp.0901624 · 7.03 Impact Factor