Article

Bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in advanced Parkinson's disease: five year follow-up.

Claude Bernard Lyon I, Université de Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Service de Neurologie C, Lyon, France.
Journal of Neurology (Impact Factor: 3.58). 03/2009; 256(2):225-33. DOI:10.1007/s00415-009-0076-2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD).
42 consecutive patients with idiopathic PD treated with bilateral STN stimulation were enrolled. Parkinsonian status, medication intake and neuropsychological evaluation were assessed preoperatively and at 1 and 5 years postoperatively in on and off medication/on and off stimulation conditions.
23 patients could be followed-up 5 years after surgery. In the remaining cases, 5 died, 1 could not be assessed because of device removal for infection, 1 decided not to be stimulated, and 11 were lost of follow-up (one because of a liver carcinoma and the others because they refused the formal four conditions of assessment). STN stimulation reduced the UPDRS motor score by 55 % compared to baseline in the off-medication conditions. Tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, postural stability, and gait improved by 74 %, 66 %, 59 %, 17 % and 37 %, respectively. UPDRS part II scores were reduced by 38 %. The dopaminergic treatment daily dose was reduced by 54.4 % after surgery. Axial dopa-unresponsive signs worsened in some patients. Among the 42 initial patients we observed the following: 2 brain hemorrhages, 3 infections of the device, 2 phlebitis and 1 pulmonary embolism. In addition, 2 patients needed a repositioning of the electrode. Among the 23 patients followed at 5 years, long lasting side effects consisted in dysarthria (56 %), depression (39 %), eyelid opening apraxia (30.4 %) and apathy (4.3 %).
Our data confirm that bilateral STN stimulation is beneficial in the long-term for PD patients but does not prevent disease progression and the occurence of axial levodopa unresponsive signs in some patients.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
76 Views
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Parkinson's disease research field is a rapidly moving one, as many of the relevant processes underlying PD neurodegeneration are being deciphered, enabling novel approaches to treatment to be assessed both in the laboratory and in the clinic. This review aims to highlight the most relevant updates in the PD field, with emphasis on research that may help lead towards an improvement in the treatment of this condition.
    Journal of Neurology 04/2013; · 3.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective and evidence-based treatment option for Parkinson's disease. Studies have shown that DBS has good and long-term effects on motor function and quality of life for patients in an advanced stage of the disease and that it is more effective than medical therapy alone. Moreover, a favorable effect of DBS could also be detected at an earlier stage of the disease. On the other hand, possible risks and side effects of the procedure need to be taken into consideration. These can manifest as procedure-related complications, such as bleeding and infections in addition to stimulation-associated phenomena, such as neuropsychiatric disorders and motor side effects. Despite the good effects of DBS important issues still need to be addressed which will be discussed in this article considering the results of several new randomized and controlled clinical studies.For patients with Parkinson's disease with early fluctuations and dyskinesia, DBS has been found to be superior to the best pharmaceutical treatment; therefore, DBS can be considered as a treatment option in the earlier course of the disease. The diagnostic evaluation and the exclusion of contraindications are crucial for patient selection. The choice of the target should be based on the individual symptoms in patients although the subthalamic nucleus (STN) can be considered the standard target. In every case an individual assessment of chances and risks must be conducted and realistic goals and reasonable expectations must be defined.
    Der Nervenarzt 01/2014; · 0.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment of choice for patients with advanced idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) who have motor complication with medication. The objectives of this study are to analyze long-term follow-up data of STN DBS cases and to identify the factors related to outcomes. Fifty-two PD patients who underwent STN DBS were followed-up for more than 3 years. The Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and other clinical profiles were assessed preoperatively and during follow-up. A linear regression model was used to analyze whether factors predict the results of STN DBS. We divided the study individuals into subgroups according to several factors and compared subgroups. Preoperative activity of daily living (ADL) and the magnitude of preoperative levodopa response were shown to predict the improvement in UPDRS part II without medication, and preoperative ADL and levodopa equivalent dose (LED) were shown to predict the improvement in UPDRS part II with medication. In UPDRS part III with medication, the magnitude of preoperative levodopa response was a predicting factor. The intensity of preoperative levodopa response was a strong factor for motor outcome. And preoperative ADL and LED were strong factors for ADL improvement. More vigorous studies should be conducted to elucidate how levodopa-induced motor complications are ameliorated after STN DBS.
    Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 08/2013; 54(2):118-24. · 0.56 Impact Factor