Double-Balloon Endoscopy Depicts Diminutive Small Bowel Lesions in Gastrointestinal Lymphoma

Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Digestive Diseases and Sciences (Impact Factor: 2.55). 03/2009; 55(1):158-65. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-009-0713-8
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim was to determine the prevalence of small bowel involvement in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) lymphoma by double-balloon endoscopy (DBE). We examined 29 patients with primary GI lymphoma by oral and anal DBEs. Clinicopathologic features related to the prevalence of diminutive small bowel involvement and the clinical outcome were retrospectively investigated. Diminutive small bowel lesions were found in 14 patients. The prevalence of the lesions was not different between patients with primary small bowel lymphoma and those with primary extra-small bowel lymphoma (50% versus 47%, P = 0.6). However, clinical stage was more advanced in patients with the lesions than in those without (P < 0.05). The lesions were more frequently found in T-cell lymphoma (100%) and follicular lymphoma (77%) than in the other types of lymphoma (15%) (P < 0.05). Diminutive small intestinal lesions occur in patients with GI lymphoma, especially in those with follicular lymphoma and T-cell lymphoma. GI lymphomas of these histologic types are candidates for scrutiny by DBE.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Small bowel tumours are rare and originate from a wide variety of benign and malignant entities. Adenocarcinomas are the most frequent primary malignant small bowel tumours. Submucosal tumours like gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) or neuroendocrine tumours (NET) may show a central umbilication, pathologic vessels, bridging folds or an ulceration of the overlying mucosa. These signs help to differentiate them from harmless bulges caused by impression from outside, e.g. from other intestinal loops. Sarcomas of the small bowel are rare neoplasias with mesenchymal origin, sometimes presenting as protruding masses. Benign tumours like lipoma, fibrolipoma, fibroma, myoma, and heterotopias typically present as submucosal masses. They cannot be differentiated endoscopically from those with malignant potential as GIST or NET. Neuroendocrine carcinomas may present with diffuse infiltration, which may resemble other malignant tumours. The endoscopic appearance of small bowel lymphomas has a great variation from mass lesions to diffuse infiltrative changes. Melanoma metastases are the most frequent metastases to the small bowel. They may be hard to distinguish from other tumours when originating from an amelanotic melanoma.
    01/2013; 1(3-4). DOI:10.1016/j.vjgien.2013.08.001
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: No method for sufficiently making the differential diagnosis of intestinal lymphoma resembling lymphoid hyperplasia (LH) on endoscopy has yet been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of narrow-band imaging (NBI) in diagnosing intestinal lymphoma. Prospective study. Single-center study. Sixty-one patients with primary or systemic lymphoma were enrolled in this study. The terminal ileum and entire colon were observed by using conventional endoscopy. NBI was subsequently performed when small polypoid lesions were detected. A decrease in the number of vascular networks (DVNs) and the presence of irregular vessels on the surface of the epithelia were defined as characteristic findings of intestinal lymphoma. The diagnostic accuracy of these 2 findings in distinguishing intestinal lymphoma from LH was examined. The ability to use NBI to distinguish intestinal lymphoma from LH. Two hundred ninety-four small polypoid lesions, including 59 lymphomas and 235 LH lesions, were detected. The rates of detecting DVNs and the presence of irregular vessels were significantly higher in the lymphoma samples (81.4% and 62.7%) than in the LH samples (25.5% and 4.7%). Based on these findings, the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for differentiating intestinal lymphoma from LH were 88.8%, 62.7%, 95.3%, 77.1%, and 91.1%, respectively, which are significantly higher than those of conventional endoscopy. Single-center study. DVNs and the presence of irregular vessels on NBI are thus considered to be useful findings for differentiating intestinal lymphoma from benign LH.
    Gastrointestinal endoscopy 05/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2014.03.030 · 4.90 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent progress in the research regarding the molecular pathogenesis and management of gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma is reviewed. In approximately 90% of cases, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection plays the causative role in the pathogenesis, and H. pylori eradication is nowadays the first-line treatment for this disease, which leads to complete disease remission in 50%-90% of cases. In H. pylori-dependent cases, microbe-generated immune responses, including interaction between B and T cells involving CD40 and CD40L co-stimulatory molecules, are considered to induce the development of MALT lymphoma. In H. pylori-independent cases, activation of the nuclear factor-κB pathway by oncogenic products of specific chromosomal translocations such as t(11;18)/API2-MALT1, or inactivation of tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced protein 3 (A20) are considered to contribute to the lymphomagenesis. Recently, a large-scale Japanese multicenter study confirmed that the long-term clinical outcome of gastric MALT lymphoma after H. pylori eradication is excellent. Treatment modalities for patients not responding to H. pylori eradication include a "watch and wait" strategy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, rituximab immunotherapy, and a combination of these. Because of the indolent behavior of MALT lymphoma, second-line treatment should be tailored in consideration of the clinical stage and extent of the disease in each patient.
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 12/2013; 19(45):8181-8187. DOI:10.3748/wjg.v19.i45.8181 · 2.43 Impact Factor