Article

The demography of nurses and patients on acute psychiatric wards in England

St Bartholomew School of Nursing and Midwifery, City University, London, UK.
Journal of Clinical Nursing (Impact Factor: 1.23). 04/2009; 18(6):884-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02362.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To describe the ethnic and demographic composition of staff and patients on acute psychiatric wards in England.
A significant proportion of the UK population (7.6%) belong to an ethnic minority and there are concerns that ethnic minority patients are not well served by psychiatry, in particular that they are subject to excessive force and coercion.
Survey of a random sample of psychiatric wards in three regions.
A survey was conducted of staff (n = 1536) and patients (n = 11,128) on 136 acute admission psychiatric wards.
Ethnic minority patients were more likely to be admitted with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, younger, more likely to be admitted for a risk of harm to others and more likely to be legally detained. The association between ethnic minority status and detention remains, even when risk, age, gender and diagnosis are taken into account. Ethnic minority patients come from areas of greater social deprivation and fragmentation. Ethnic concordance between staff and patients varies, but the greatest difference is found in London where the proportion of minority staff is greater than the proportion of minority patients.
There continues to be evidence that ethnic minority patients are subject to an excessive amount of legal coercion in English mental health services. However, the proportion of staff belonging to an ethnic minority is greater than the proportion of patients.
Solutions to the problem of excessive use of legal coercion with ethnic minority patients need to be found. Changes of recruitment strategies are required if concordance is to be achieved.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Len Bowers, Jun 22, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
230 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of seclusion is unpalatable to nurses and frequently unpleasant for patients. Time out is rated by nurses and patients as more acceptable. Several countries have initiated exercises to reduce the use of seclusion, but England has not. In this study, data were collected on the sequence of conflict (aggression, rule breaking, absconding etc.) and containment (coerced medication, restraint, special observation etc., including time out and seclusion) for the first 2 weeks of 522 acute admissions on 84 wards in 31 English hospitals between June 2009 and March 2010. Data were analysed to describe what preceded and followed time out and seclusion episodes in a nursing shift. Seclusion was used with 7·5% of patients, and time out with 15·5%. Both containment methods were used with similar patients in similar circumstances, and both brought disturbed behaviour to a close in half of the cases. Some seclusion appeared to follow less serious disturbed behaviour. There was an important variation in rates of seclusion between hospitals. Seclusion and time out had equally good outcomes in the management of physical violence to others. There is good evidence that seclusion rates can be reduced safely, and time out can sometimes be used as a substitute. A national registration and reporting system should be introduced in England, and serious efforts made to reduce seclusion use in hospitals where rates are high.
    Journal of Advanced Nursing 07/2011; 68(4):826-35. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05784.x · 1.69 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Accessible summary• Locking of psychiatric wards doors is more frequent, but the impact is unknown.• Staff patients and visitors returned a questionnaire about the issue.• Patients did not like the door being locked as much as staff, and being on a locked ward was associated with greater rejection of the practice.• Staff working on locked wards were more positive about it than those who did not.AbstractLocking the door of adult acute psychiatric wards has become increasingly common in the UK. There has been little investigation of its efficacy or acceptability in comparison to other containment methods. We surveyed the beliefs and attitudes of patients, staff and visitors to the practice of door locking in acute psychiatry. Wards that previously participated in a previous study were contacted and sent a questionnaire. A total of 1227 responses were obtained, with the highest number coming from staff, and the smallest from visitors. Analysis identified five factors (adverse effects, staff benefits, patient safety benefits, patient comforts and cold milieu). Patients were more negative about door locking than the staff, and more likely to express such negative judgments if they were residing in a locked ward. For staff, being on a locked ward was associated with more positive judgments about the practice. There were significant age, gender and ethnicity effects for staff only. Each group saw the issue of locked doors from their own perspective. Patients registered more anger, irritation and depression as a consequence of locked doors than staff or visitors thought they experienced. These differences were accentuated by the actual experience of the ward being locked.
    Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 11/2010; 17(10):873 - 880. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01614.x · 0.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    01/2009; City University.