Article

Phase I study of epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine plus matuzumab in previously untreated patients with advanced oesophagogastric cancer

Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Surrey, UK.
British Journal of Cancer (Impact Factor: 4.82). 10/2008; 99(6):868-74. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604622
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the humanised antiepidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody matuzumab combined with epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) in patients as first-line treatment for advanced oesophagogastric cancer that express epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). This was a phase I dose escalation study of matuzumab at 400 and 800 mg weekly and 1200 mg every 3 weeks combined with ECX (epirubicin 50 mg m(-2), cisplatin 60 mg m(-2) on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) daily). Patients were treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or for a maximum of eight cycles. Twenty-one patients were treated with matuzumab at three different dose levels (DLs) combined with ECX. The main dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was grade 3 lethargy at 1200 mg matuzumab every 3 weeks and thus 800 mg matuzumab weekly was the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). Other common toxicities included rash, nausea, stomatitis and diarrhoea. Pharmacokinetic evaluation demonstrated that the coadministration of ECX did not alter the exposure of matuzumab. Pharmacodynamic studies on skin biopsies demonstrated inhibition of the EGFR pathway. Objective response rates of 65% (95% confidence interval (CI): 43-82), disease stabilisation of 25% (95% CI: 11-47) and a disease control rate (CR + PR + SD) of 90% were achieved overall. The MTD of matuzumab in combination with ECX was 800 mg weekly, and at this DL it was well-tolerated and showed encouraging antitumour activity. At the doses evaluated in serial skin biopsies, matuzumab decreased phosphorylation of EGFR and MAPK, and increased phosphorylation of STAT-3.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Sheela Rao, Jul 29, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
89 Views
  • Source
    • "Tumors treated with the combination of matuzumab and cisplatin also manifested both a significantly smaller Ki67 index (Fig. 4B), a marker of cell proliferation, and a significantly greater proportion of apoptotic cells (Fig. 4C), compared with tumors treated with either agent alone. Matuzumab alone or in combination with cytotoxic agents was previously shown to inhibit Akt or Erk phosphorylation in human tissue samples or human xenografts in nude mice [30] [31] [32] [33] [34]. The combination of matuzumab and cisplatin likely reduced the Ki67 index in the present study because matuzumab blocked the cisplatin-induced activation of Erk, which is important for cancer cell proliferation as a component of the Ras-MEK-Erk signaling pathway [17,18]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cisplatin is a key agent in combination chemotherapy for various types of solid tumor. We now show that cisplatin activates signaling by the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) by inducing cleavage of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HB-EGF). Matuzumab, a monoclonal antibody to EGFR, inhibited cisplatin-induced EGFR signaling, likely through competition with the soluble form of HB-EGF for binding to EGFR. Matuzumab enhanced the antitumor effect of cisplatin in nude mice harboring human non-small cell lung cancer xenografts. Our findings shed light on the mechanism by which monoclonal antibodies to EGFR might augment the efficacy of cisplatin.
    FEBS letters 12/2008; 582(30):4125-30. DOI:10.1016/j.febslet.2008.11.010 · 3.34 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide with approximately one million cases diagnosed annually. Despite considerable improvements in surgical techniques, innovations in clinical diagnostics and the development of new chemotherapy regimens, the clinical outcome for patients with advanced gastric cancer and cancer of the GEJ is generally poor with 5-year survival rates ranging between 5 and 15%. The understanding of cancer relevant events has resulted in new therapeutic strategies, particularly in developing of new molecular targeted agents. These agents have the ability to target a variety of cancer relevant receptors and downstream pathways including the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), the insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGFR), the c-Met pathway, cell-cycle pathways, and down-stream signalling pathways such as the Akt-PI3k-mTOR pathway. In the era of new molecularly targeted agents this review focuses on recent developments of targeting relevant pathways involved in gastric cancer and cancer of the GEJ.
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 05/2009; 135(7):855-66. DOI:10.1007/s00432-009-0583-7 · 3.01 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many chemotherapeutic drugs, including fluoropyrimidines, platinums, CPT-11, taxanes and adriamycin have single-agent activity in advanced gastric cancer. Although combination chemotherapy has been shown to be more effective than single agents, response rates between 30 and 50% have not fulfilled their promise as progression-free survival from the best combinations ranges between 3 and 7 months and overall survival between 8 and 11 months. The development of targeted therapies in gastric cancer clearly stays behind the integration of these novel agents into new treatment concepts for patients with colorectal cancer. This review summarizes the experience and major recent advances in the development of targeted therapies in advanced gastric cancer. Recent publications on targeted therapies in gastric cancer are limited to nonrandomized phase I or II trials. The majority of agents tested were angiogenesis inhibitors or agents targeting the epidermal growth factor receptors epidermal growth factor receptor 1 and HER2. Adequately powered, randomized phase III trials are necessary to define the clinical role of targeted therapies in advanced gastric cancer. Biomarker studies to correlate with treatment outcomes will be critical to identify patients who benefit most from chemotherapy and targeted therapy.
    Current opinion in oncology 05/2009; 21(4):381-5. DOI:10.1097/CCO.0b013e32832c42e0 · 3.76 Impact Factor
Show more