Devices and formulations for pulmonary vaccination

University of Groningen, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy , Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen , The Netherlands .
Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery (Impact Factor: 4.84). 06/2013; 10(10). DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2013.810622
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Introduction: Pulmonary vaccination could be a promising alternative to vaccination by injection. Administration of a vaccine to the lungs does not require the use of needles, which reduces the number of trained healthcare workers needed, the risk of needle-stick injuries and needle waste. Besides a systemic immune response, pulmonary vaccination may also induce a mucosal immune response. Such a local response may increase the effectiveness of vaccination against airborne pathogens. Although this route of administration has been studied for decades, no pulmonary vaccine is commercially available yet, due to various challenges mostly intrinsic to pulmonary drug delivery and vaccine formulation. Areas covered: This review discusses the inhalation devices and formulation strategies that may be suitable for the pulmonary administration of vaccines. In addition, critical parameters are addressed, such as the target population, to help assessing whether pulmonary administration of a specific vaccine may be feasible and beneficial or not. Expert opinion: A combined approach of inhalation device and vaccine formulation development is essential. This should result in a system that can effectively be used by the target population and can be produced at low costs. Only then, this challenging administration route can be successfully applied to large-scale vaccination programs.

Download full-text


Available from: Henderik Frijlink, Oct 27, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Carbon dioxide Assisted Nebulization with a Bubble Dryer((R)) (CAN-BD) processing allows particles to be made in the 3-5 mum size range, which is desirable for lung delivery, without destroying biological activity. In response to the Grand Challenge in Global Health Initiative #3, we have been developing an inhalable needle-free live-attenuated measles virus vaccine for use in developing countries. Measles was chosen because it is the number one vaccine preventable killer of children worldwide. Powders were processed by CAN-BD, where a solution containing excipients and live-attenuated measles virus in water was mixed intimately with supercritical or near superctitical carbon dioxide to form an emulsion. The emulsion was expanded to atmospheric pressure through a flow restrictor. The resulting plume was dried by heated nitrogen and the powders collected on a filter at the bottom of the drying chamber. Powders were analyzed using varying techniques including X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, Andersen cascade impaction, differential scanning calorimetery, Karl Fischer titration, and viral plaque assay. CAN-BD has been used to produce powders of live-attenuated measles virus vaccine with characteristics desirable for lung delivery. The powders retain viral activity through forming and drying the microparticles by CAN-BD, and have passed the WHO stability test for 1 week at 37 degrees C. The powders have an amorphous character and a glass transition temperature of around 60 degrees C. Lyophilization, the present standard commercial method of processing measles vaccine makes solids with a water content of less than 1%. By substituting myo-inositol for sorbitol and using the CAN-BD drying technique the water content can be lowered to 0.5%. The most successful formulations to date have been based conceptually on the current lyophilized formulation, but with modifications to the type and amounts of sugar. Of current interest are formulations containing myo-inositol, as they retain high viral activity and have low initial water content.
    Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery 03/2008; 21(1):25-34. DOI:10.1089/jamp.2007.0658 · 2.40 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Using a procedure of emulsification-lyophilization (PEL), adjuvant lipid A-cochleates (LACs) were prepared as a carrier for model antigen bovine serum albumin (BSA). With phosphatidylserine and lipid A as emulsifiers dissolved in oil phase (O), sucrose and CaCl2 in the inner water phase (W1), and BSA, sucrose and PEG2000 in the outer water phase (W2), the W1/O/W2 emulsions were prepared and subsequently lyophilized to form a dry product which was stable enough to be stored at room temperature. Upon rehydration of the dry products, cochleates formed with a size of 800nm and antigen association rates of 38%. After vaccination of mice through oral mucosal (o.m.) administration, LACs showed no side effects but induced potent immune responses as evidenced by high levels of IgG in the sera and IgA in the salivary, intestinal and vaginal secretions of mice. In addition, high levels of IgG2a and IFN-γ in the sera or culture supernatants of splenocytes of the immunized mice were also detected. These results revealed that LACs induced a mixed Th1/Th2 response against the loaded antigens. Thus, the LACs prepared by PEL were able to induce both systemic and mucosal immune responses and may act as a potent cold-chain-free oral mucosal vaccine adjuvant delivery system (VADS).
    International Journal of Pharmaceutics 04/2014; 468(1-2). DOI:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.04.002 · 3.65 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In 50years following the introduction of the first dry powder inhaler to the market several developments have occurred. Multiple-unit dose and multi-dose devices have been introduced, but first generation capsule inhalers are still widely used for new formulations. Many new particle engineering techniques have been developed and considerable effort has been put in understanding the mechanisms that control particle interaction and powder dispersion during inhalation. Yet, several misconceptions about optimal inhaler performance manage to survive in modern literature. It is, for example still widely believed that a flow rate independent fine particle fraction contributes to an inhalation performance independent therapy, that dry powder inhalers perform best at 4 kPa (or 60L/min) and that a high resistance device cannot be operated correctly by patients with reduced lung function. Nevertheless, there seems to be a great future for dry powder inhalation. Many new areas of interest for dry powder inhalation are explored and with the assistance of new techniques like computational fluid dynamics and emerging particle engineering technologies, this is likely to result in a new generation of inhaler devices and formulations, that will enable the introduction of new therapies based on inhaled medicines.
    Advanced drug delivery reviews 04/2014; 75. DOI:10.1016/j.addr.2014.04.004 · 12.71 Impact Factor
Show more