Impact of Screening Colonoscopy on Outcomes in Colon Cancer Surgery

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
JAMA SURGERY (Impact Factor: 3.94). 06/2013; DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.8
Source: PubMed


IMPORTANCE Screening colonoscopy seemingly decreases colorectal cancer rates in the United States. In addition to removing benign lesions and preventing progression to malignancy, screening colonoscopy theoretically identifies asymptomatic patients with early-stage disease, potentially leading to higher survival rates. OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of screening colonoscopy on outcomes of colon cancer surgery by reviewing differences in staging, disease-free interval, risk of recurrence, and survival and to identify whether diagnosis through screening improves long-term outcomes independent of staging. DESIGN Retrospective review of prospectively maintained, institutional review board-approved database. SETTING Tertiary care center with high patient volume. PATIENTS All patients who underwent colon cancer surgery at Massachusetts General Hospital from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2011. INTERVENTION Colon cancer surgery. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Postoperative staging, death, and recurrence, measured as incidence and time to event. RESULTS A total of 1071 patients were included, with 217 diagnosed through screening. Patients not diagnosed through screening were at risk for a more invasive tumor (≥T3: relative risk [RR] = 1.96; P < .001), nodal disease (RR = 1.92; P < .001), and metastatic disease on presentation (RR = 3.37; P < .001). In follow-up, these patients had higher death rates (RR = 3.02; P < .001) and recurrence rates (RR = 2.19; P = .004) as well as shorter survival (P < .001) and disease-free intervals (P < .001). Cox and logistic regression controlling for staging and baseline characteristics revealed that death rate (P = .02) and survival duration (P = .01) were better stage for stage with diagnosis through screening. Death and metastasis rates also remained significantly lower in tumors without nodal or metastatic spread (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Patients with colon cancer identified on screening colonoscopy not only have lower-stage disease on presentation but also have better outcomes independent of their staging. Compliance to screening colonoscopy guidelines can play an important role in prolonging longevity, improving quality of life, and reducing health care costs through early detection of colon cancer.

Download full-text


Available from: Ramzi Amri, Oct 04, 2015
1 Follower
52 Reads
  • Immunotherapy 12/2013; 5(12):1267-1269. DOI:10.2217/imt.13.131 · 2.07 Impact Factor
  • Journal of Surgical Research 02/2014; 186(2):505. DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2013.11.208 · 1.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Access to care is a pillar of U.S. healthcare reform and could potentially challenge existing ethnic and gender disparities in care. We present a snapshot of these disparities in surgical colon cancer patients in the largest public hospital in Massachusetts, a state leading in providing universal healthcare, to indicate potential changes that might result from universal care access. All surgical colon cancer patients at Massachusetts General Hospital (2004-2011) were included. Baseline characteristics, perioperative, and long-term outcomes were compared. Among 1,071 patients, the 110 (10.3%) minority patients presented with more comorbid (mean Charlson score 0.84 vs. 0.71; P = 0.039), metastatic (21.8% vs. 14%; P = 0.026), and node-positive disease (50% vs. 38.8%; P = 0.014). Women (n = 521; 48.6%) had less screening diagnoses (overall: 17.8% vs. 22.6%; P = 0.049, screening age: 26.4% vs. 32.7%; P = 0.036) with subsequently higher rates of metastatic disease on pathology (11.3% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.02). Multivariate adjustment for baseline staging makes outcome disparities no longer statistically significant. Significant gender and ethnic disparities subsist at baseline despite long-standing low-threshold healthcare access, although seemingly mitigated by enrollment into high-level care, empowering equal chances for underprivileged groups. The outcomes are also a reminder that universal healthcare will not be a panacea for the deeply rooted and dynamic causes of presentation inequalities. J. Surg. Oncol. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Journal of Surgical Oncology 06/2014; 109(7). DOI:10.1002/jso.23567 · 3.24 Impact Factor
Show more