Equal numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells make the human brain an isometrically scaled-up primate brain

Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
The Journal of Comparative Neurology (Impact Factor: 3.23). 04/2009; 513(5):532-41. DOI: 10.1002/cne.21974
Source: PubMed


The human brain is often considered to be the most cognitively capable among mammalian brains and to be much larger than expected for a mammal of our body size. Although the number of neurons is generally assumed to be a determinant of computational power, and despite the widespread quotes that the human brain contains 100 billion neurons and ten times more glial cells, the absolute number of neurons and glial cells in the human brain remains unknown. Here we determine these numbers by using the isotropic fractionator and compare them with the expected values for a human-sized primate. We find that the adult male human brain contains on average 86.1 +/- 8.1 billion NeuN-positive cells ("neurons") and 84.6 +/- 9.8 billion NeuN-negative ("nonneuronal") cells. With only 19% of all neurons located in the cerebral cortex, greater cortical size (representing 82% of total brain mass) in humans compared with other primates does not reflect an increased relative number of cortical neurons. The ratios between glial cells and neurons in the human brain structures are similar to those found in other primates, and their numbers of cells match those expected for a primate of human proportions. These findings challenge the common view that humans stand out from other primates in their brain composition and indicate that, with regard to numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells, the human brain is an isometrically scaled-up primate brain.

Download full-text


Available from: Lea Tenenholz Grinberg,
  • Source
    • "Micro-anatomical changes that are part of memory formation are not exclusively related to neurons and their parts, but involve non-neuronal cells, which in many areas of the human brain exceed the number of neurons (Azevedo et al., 2009). These non-neuronal cells include astrocytes, an abundant and arguably the most heterogeneous glial cell type in the central nervous system (CNS). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Astrocytes, the most heterogeneous glial cells in the central nervous system (CNS), execute a multitude of homeostatic functions and contribute to memory formation. Consolidation of synaptic and systemic memory is a prolonged process and hours are required to form long-term memory. In the past, neurons or their parts have been considered to be the exclusive cellular sites of these processes, however, it has now become evident that astrocytes provide an important and essential contribution to memory formation. Astrocytes participate in the morphological remodeling associated with synaptic plasticity, an energy-demanding process that requires mobilization of glycogen, which, in the CNS, is almost exclusively stored in astrocytes. Synaptic remodeling also involves bidirectional astroglial-neuronal communication supported by astroglial receptors and release of gliosignaling molecules. Astroglia exhibit cytoplasmic excitability that engages second messengers, such as Ca2+, for phasic, and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), for tonic signal coordination with neuronal processes. The detection of signals by astrocytes and the release of gliosignaling molecules, in particular by vesicle-based mechanisms, occurs with a significant delay after stimulation, orders of magnitude longer than that present in stimulus–secretion coupling in neurons. These particular arrangements position astrocytes as integrators ideally tuned to support time-dependent memory formation.
    Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 11/2015; 9. DOI:10.3389/fnint.2015.00056
  • Source
    • "In the human brain there are 85 billion neurons and estimated about 100 trillion synapses (Mishra, 2013); experimental brain nano-techniques three complementary approaches are considered: 1) snapshots of connections in the brain by making thin physical slices and stacking electron microscopy images of these slices. This technique does not provide dynamic and chemical information; 2) dynamic voltage map of the brain, dealing with the brain as close relative of a computer (Azevedo et al., 2009; Alivisatos et al., 2012), with the aim to make accessible the emergent properties underlying the use and storage of information by mapping network activity versus single or small numbers of multiple unit recordings currently available; 3) the attempt to obtain functional chemical maps of the neurotransmitter systems in the brain, for investigating the genetic and chemical heterogeneity of the brain and the interactions between various neurotransmitter systems. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The study of brain dynamics utilizes today the new features of nano-biotechnology. Neurons are connected by synapses in an electronic way, therefore we have a charge transport in the brain. Electronic systems have voltages and currents sources and complex interconnected impedances; the particular behaviour of current generates wanted voltages transformation with the same impedance. Considering the neural computation as the study of the classes of trajectories on a manifold geometry defined under appropriate constraints, different types of brain geometries change the form of straight line and can be modeled by the electrical power. Locally a new theoretical analytical transport model is able to provide interesting predictions relatively to an appropriate use of nanomaterials for the brain. This clearly indicates that nano-modelling in bio and brain contexts requires a recovery of the concept of natural computation.
  • Source
    • "It is estimated that the human brain contains over 100 billion cells of more than 10,000 different types (Azevedo et al., 2009). Understanding how all of these cells are generated in the correct proportions is one of the great challenges of developmental neuroscience. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Early retinal progenitor cells (RPCs) in vertebrates produce lineages that vary greatly both in terms of cell number and fate composition, yet how this variability is achieved remains unknown. One possibility is that these RPCs are individually distinct and that each gives rise to a unique lineage. Another is that stochastic mechanisms play upon the determinative machinery of equipotent early RPCs to drive clonal variability. Here we show that a simple model, based on the independent firing of key fate-influencing transcription factors, can quantitatively account for the intrinsic clonal variance in the zebrafish retina and predict the distributions of neuronal cell types in clones where one or more of these fates are made unavailable.
    Developmental Cell 09/2015; 34(5). DOI:10.1016/j.devcel.2015.08.011 · 9.71 Impact Factor
Show more