Article

Second-Line Treatments in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer A Systematic Review of Literature and Metaanalysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

City Hospital, Department of Oncology, Via Settembrini 2, Rimini 47900, Italy.
Chest (Impact Factor: 7.13). 02/2009; 135(6):1596-609. DOI: 10.1378/chest.08-1503
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To assess the efficacy of second-line treatments in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
A systematic review of literature with metaanalysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was independently performed by three authors. A primary analysis included all RCTs comparing any approach (chemotherapy or therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] inhibitors) with placebo; a secondary analysis included all RCTs comparing any treatment with docetaxel therapy every 3 weeks. The 1-year survival rate (SR) of the primary analysis was the primary outcome of the study; the 1-year SR of the secondary analysis, response rate (RR), and time to progression of primary and secondary analyses were the secondary end points.
Fourteen RCTs met the selection criteria. The outcomes of 2,627 and 5,952 patients were analyzed in the primary and secondary analysis, respectively. A significant heterogeneity was documented in the primary analysis for 1-year SR with odd ratio [OR] = 0.763 (p = 0.029). No heterogeneity was documented for RR in the primary analysis, with OR = 0.165 (p < 0.001). A modest heterogeneity was documented in the secondary analysis for 1-year SR and RR, with 1-year SR OR = 0.924 (p = 0.122) and RR OR = 1.069 (p = 0.643).
Second-line treatments in NSCLC seem to improve the main outcomes better than supportive care. Docetaxel administration every 3 weeks probably remains the "gold standard" because at present the data in literature are not enough to support a greater efficacy of other alternative options. Further trials are needed to identify a clinical and biological profile that could predict the response to treatments and a criterion to select the patients to be treated with chemotherapy or EGFR inhibitors.

Full-text

Available from: Emiliano Tamburini, Mar 25, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
94 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BackgroundThis study analyzed the negative prognostic factors in patients who received second-line chemotherapy for advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 137 patients with inoperable stage III-IV NSCLC who received second-line chemotherapy. The effects of clinical parameters on survival were analyzed and the hazard ratios (HR) for mortality were identified by a Cox regression analysis.ResultsSex, age older than 65 years, smoking history, cell type, T-stage, best response to first-line chemotherapy and first-line chemotherapy regimen were significant negative predictors in univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis showed that patients older than 65 years (HR, 1.530; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.020-2.297), advanced T stage (T4 vs. T1; HR, 2.273; 95% CI, 1.010-5.114) and non-responders who showed progression with first-line chemotherapy (HR, 1.530; 95% CI, 1.063-2.203) had higher HR for death.ConclusionThe age factor, T stage and responsiveness to first-line chemotherapy were important factors in predicting the outcome of patients with advanced NSCLC who received second-line chemotherapy. The results may help to predict outcomes for these patients in the future.
    Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 07/2014; 77(1):13-7. DOI:10.4046/trd.2014.77.1.13
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) improves overall survival. There is a lack of data regarding the impact on patients' overall health condition. This prospective, non-interventional study evaluated performance status (PS) and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) during second-line pemetrexed treatment in routine clinical practice. Stage III/IV NSCLC patients who initiated second-line pemetrexed (standard vitamin and dexamethasone supplementation) were observed for a maximum of 9 treatment cycles. The primary objective was to evaluate the proportion of patients achieving improvement of Karnofsky Index (KI) of ≥ 10% (absolute) or maintaining KI ≥ 80% after the second treatment cycle ("KI benefit response"). HR-QoL was self-rated using the EuroQoL-5D questionnaire (EQ-5D). Factors potentially associated with KI benefit response were evaluated using logistic regression models. Of 521 eligible patients (73.5% Stage IV, median age 66.3 yrs, 36.1% ≥ 70 yrs, 62.0% with KI ≥ 80%), 471 (90.4%) completed at least 2 treatment cycles. 58.0% (95%CI 53.6%;62.2%) achieved KI benefit response after the second cycle. Patients with baseline KI ≥ 80%, no Grade 3/4 toxicities during the first 2 cycles, or combination regimen as prior first-line therapy were more likely to achieve a KI benefit response. EQ-5D scores improved over time. Grade 3/4 toxicities were reported in 23.8% of patients (mainly fatigue/asthenia 15.9%, neutropenia 8.7%). In this large prospective, non-interventional study of second-line pemetrexed treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC, including 36% elderly patients ( ≥ 70 years), physician-rated PS and self-rated HR-QoL were maintained or improved in the majority of patients. Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00540241) on October 4, 2007.
    BMC Cancer 01/2012; 12:14. DOI:10.1186/1471-2407-12-14 · 3.32 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction Bevacizumab is recommended in first line chemotherapy for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Paclitaxel is a doublet drug also widely used in cisplatin-based regimens. Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab is a standard regimen as first line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Since there is no guideline for third line treatment of NSCLC, some oncology units use paclitaxel–bevacizumab in some NSCLC patient after relapse of the second line. The aim of this study was to assess retrospectively the feasibility and efficacy of this treatment option in stage IV NSCLC. Methods Patients who had received the combination of paclitaxel (80 to 90 mg/m2 in a weekly schedule) and bevacizumab (7.5 to 15 mg/kg every 21 days) in the thoracic oncology departments of two university hospitals in the Rhone-Alpes Department were retrospectively reviewed. Results Twelve patients underwent this treatment. Their mean age was 56 years and their performance status was less or equal to 1 in 50 % of the cases. The chemotherapy was given as fifth line in 67 % of the patients and 67 % were antiangiogenic naïve. They received a mean of 6 courses. The overall response rate was 33 % and the disease control rate 66 %. Median progression-free survival was 5.1 months (95 %CI 1.0–9.1). Ten patients (82 %) experienced toxicity, the majority grade 1 to 2 events, and only one a grade 3 event (febrile neutropenia). There were no severe bleeding episodes. Conclusion Combined paclitaxel–bevacizumab chemotherapy seems feasible in patients with NSCLC. The toxicity profile is acceptable. This regimen should be evaluated in further prospective studies.
    Revue des Maladies Respiratoires 01/2013; DOI:10.1016/j.rmr.2013.05.011 · 0.49 Impact Factor