Evaluation of New Platinum-Based Treatment Regimens in Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
Journal of Clinical Oncology (Impact Factor: 18.43). 03/2009; 27(9):1419-25. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.1684
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine if incorporation of an additional cytotoxic agent improves overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for women with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) and primary peritoneal carcinoma who receive carboplatin and paclitaxel.
Women with stages III to IV disease were stratified by coordinating center, maximal diameter of residual tumor, and intent for interval cytoreduction and were then randomly assigned among five arms that incorporated gemcitabine, methoxypolyethylene glycosylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel. The primary end point was OS and was determined by pairwise comparison to the reference arm, with a 90% chance of detecting a true hazard ratio of 1.33 that limited type I error to 5% (two-tail) for the four comparisons.
Accrual exceeded 1,200 patients per year. An event-triggered interim analysis occurred after 272 events on the reference arm, and the study closed with 4,312 women enrolled. Arms were well balanced for demographic and prognostic factors, and 79% of patients completed eight cycles of therapy. There were no improvements in either PFS or OS associated with any experimental regimen. Survival analyses of groups defined by size of residual disease also failed to show experimental benefit in any subgroup.
Compared with standard paclitaxel and carboplatin, addition of a third cytotoxic agent provided no benefit in PFS or OS after optimal or suboptimal cytoreduction. Dual-stage, multiarm, phase III trials can efficiently evaluate multiple experimental regimens against a single reference arm. The development of new interventions beyond surgery and conventional platinum-based chemotherapy is required to additionally improve outcomes for women with advanced EOC.

Download full-text


Available from: David Samuel Alberts, Aug 03, 2015
  • Source
    • "Despite the high initial response rate, up to 80% of patients will recur and eventually develop resistance to therapy, which leads to incurable disease [3]. Addition of doxorubicin, topotecan, gemcitabine [4], or bevacizumab (anti-VEGF anti-angiogenic antibody) [5] to standard chemotherapy unfortunately has no advantages in improving patient overall survival, further indicating the significant therapeutic challenges in the treatment of ovarian cancer. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) based strategy is a promising targeted therapeutic approach for the treatment of a variety of cancers including ovarian cancer. However, the inherent or acquired resistance of tumor cells to TRAIL limits the potential application of TRAIL-mediated therapy. In this study, we identified that mitochondrial division inhibitor-1 (mdivi-1) is able to enhance the sensitivity of human ovarian cancer cells to death receptor ligands including TRAIL, FAS ligands, and TNF-α. Importantly, the combination of TRAIL and mdivi-1 has no apparent cytotoxic effect on non-transformed human cells, indicating a significant therapeutic window. We identified that caspase-8 and not the modulation of TRAIL receptors is required for the combination effect of TRAIL and mdivi-1. We further demonstrated that the enhanced efficacy of combination of mdivi-1 and death ligands is not dependent on the originally reported target of mdivi-1, Drp1, and is also not dependent on the two important pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins Bax and Bak. Thus, our study presents a novel strategy in enhancing the apoptotic effect of death receptor ligands and provides a new effective TRAIL-based combination approach for treating human ovarian cancer.
    Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 11/2014; 456(1). DOI:10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.11.010 · 2.28 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The responses of refractory or platinumresistant EOC to salvage chemotherapy are generally low and range from 10-20% (Lund et al., 1994; Rose et al., 1998; Gordon et al., 2001; Markman et al., 2002). Although the combined chemotherapy can yield higher responses, a survival improvement cannot be demonstrated (Bookman et al., 2009). Rarely and experimentally are that combined drugs will be used (Havrilesky et al., 2003). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: To study the response rate, toxicity profiles, and survival of refractory or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients treated with paclitaxel. Materials and Methods: Patients with refractory or recurrent EOC who were treated with paclitaxel between January 2002 and December 2011 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Vajira Hospital were identified. Clinicopathological features of the patients including detailed data of paclitaxel treatment were collected. Results: During the study period, a total of 44 patients were identified, with a mean age of 52.9±8.2 years. Some 13.6% (six patients) had refractory cancer to first-line chemotherapy while 86.4% (38 patients) had recurrent cancer. Among these, 35 (79.6%) and 9 (20.4%) patients were considered as platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant, respectively. Three patients (6.8%) received fewer than 2 cycles of paclitaxel due to loss to follow-up, leaving 41 patients evaluable for response. The overall response rate observed in all 41 patients was 41.5% (17 patients; 12 complete and five partial responses): 12.5% or 1/8 patients with refractory or platinum-resistant cancer and 48.5% or 16/33 patients with platinum-sensitive disease. Stable disease was demonstrated in 17.0% (seven patients) while progressive disease was apparent in 41.5% (17 patients). Median time to progress was 4.5 months (range, 0.67- 58.6 months). Median progression-free survival was not reached while median overall survival was 16.3 months (95% confidence interval, 11.0 months -21.6 months). Common toxicities were neutropenia, neuropathy, and alopecia. Conclusions: Paclitaxel is an active agent for refractory or recurrent EOC. Neutropenia, neuropathy and alopecia are common side effects.
    Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention: APJCP 04/2013; 14(4):2421-2427. DOI:10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.4.2421 · 2.51 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Ovarian cancer is the sixth most common cancer in women in the United States and Europe (Jemal et al, 2011). Most patients present with advanced stage disease and though the majority of them experience remission after surgery and a frontline platinum/ taxane-based regimen, the relapse rate is 80% (Bookman et al, 2009). Historically, the efficacy of chemotherapy retreatment in relapsed ovarian cancer has been correlated with prior platinum sensitivity, namely with the platinum-free interval (PFI; Cannistra, 2004). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The NGR-hTNF (asparagine-glycine-arginine-human tumour necrosis factor) is able to promote antitumour immune responses and to improve the intratumoural doxorubicin uptake by selectively damaging tumour blood vessels. Patients progressing after ≥ 1 platinum/taxane-based regimen received NGR-hTNF 0.8 μg m(-2) and doxorubicin 60 mg m(-2) every 3 weeks. Primary endpoint was a Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-defined response rate with a target of more than 6 out of 37 responding patients. A total of 37 patients with platinum-free interval lower than 6 months (PFI<6; n=25), or between 6 and 12 months (PFI=6-12; n=12) were enrolled. Median baseline peripheral blood lymphocyte count (PBLC) was 1.6 per ml (interquartile range, 1.2-2.1). In all, 18 patients (49%) received more than 6 cycles. Febrile neutropaenia was registered in one patient (3%). Among 35 assessable patients, 8 (23%; 95% CI 12-39%) had partial response (2 with PFI<6; 6 with PFI=6-12) and 15 (43%) had stable disease (10 with PFI<6; 5 with PFI=6-12). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.0 months for all patients, 3.8 months for patients with PFI<6, and 7.8 months for patients with PFI=6-12. Median overall survival (OS) was 17.0 months. Patients with baseline PBLC higher than the first quartile had improved PFS (P=0.01) and OS (P=0.001). Tolerability and activity of this combination warrant further randomised testing in patients with PFI<6. The role of PBLC as a blood-based biomarker deserves further investigation.
    British Journal of Cancer 05/2012; 107(1):37-42. DOI:10.1038/bjc.2012.233 · 4.82 Impact Factor
Show more