Race and Ethnicity Do Not Affect Baseline Self-Report of Pain Severity in Patients with Suspected Long-Bone Fractures

Department of Emergency Medicine, Monteflore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA.
Pain Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.3). 02/2009; 10(1):106-10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00542.x
Source: PubMed


To determine whether race or ethnicity affect baseline description of pain by patients with suspected long-bone fracture.
Secondary analysis of data from an observational study of patients age 18-55 in two urban emergency departments.
Patients rated their pain using an 11-point scale, where 0 represents no pain, and 10 represents the worst possible pain.
Of 838 patients, 49% were Hispanic, 29% African American, and 22% White. Mean baseline pain scores were, respectively, 8.2, 8.1, and 7.7. In multivariate analysis, pair-wise comparisons showed no significant differences in pain self-report.
Ethnoracial oligoanalgesia cannot be explained by differences in baseline pain severity.

3 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Multiple studies have shown that racial and ethnic minorities often experience lower quality of health care when compared with white patients (Institute of Medicine [IOM], 2002). Even after taking into account various factors like differences in access to care and disease severity, racial and ethnic disparities in care remain, and are often associated with worse health outcomes (IOM; Mead et al., 2008).
    12/2010: pages 271-282;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this handbook is to share information about evidence-based approaches for the reduction of health disparities in the USA. It brings information about intervention research that affects African Americans. For this project, there are three initial concepts: African Americans, health disparities, and intervention. This chapter reviews selected literature to provide definitions and framing. In this process, the chapter offers conceptual, operational, and theoretical reconsiderations.
    12/2010: pages 3-33;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Twenty years is a long time in the life of a preventable epidemic. In 1990 when HIV was infecting and AIDS was killing white gay and bisexual men and threatening the general public, there was public concern about the disease and federal research and prevention dollars flowed. It was well established that HIV was spread primarily through sexual intercourse without barrier protection such as condoms. “Risky sex” occurred between men and between men and women. By 2000, HIV infection rates and deaths due to AIDS were in decline among White men in AIDS epi-centers, but continued among African Americans. The HIV/AIDS epidemic has not only continued its course among Blacks but also concentrated among black men and in black communities and has become yet another affliction among Blacks. At the very same time, public attention and urgency to the AIDS epidemic has waned and prevention dollars have been largely replaced by funding of clinical trials of new drugs. If you are Black and poor, there are now, in fact, more incentives to get infected with HIV to get social support through a clinical trial then to avoid getting infected in the first place. Public and government indifference to disease among Blacks but a willingness at the same time to use them in research are precisely the same reactions to disproportionate rates of yellow fever, typhus, syphilis, and tuberculosis among Blacks during Jim Crow segregation in the early twentieth century (McBride, 1991).
    Handbook of African American Health, 12/2010: pages 183-195;
Show more

Similar Publications