Patients' and nurses' perspectives on oxygen therapy: A qualitative study

School of Nursing, Deakin University, Epworth Eastern Hospital, Victoria, Australia.
Journal of Advanced Nursing (Impact Factor: 1.74). 04/2009; 65(3):634-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04933.x
Source: PubMed


This paper is a report of a study to describe patients' and nurses' perspectives on oxygen therapy.
Failure to correct significant hypoxaemia may result in cardiac arrest, need for mechanical ventilation or death. Nurses frequently make clinical decisions about the selection and management of low-flow oxygen therapy devices. Better understanding of patients' and nurses' experiences of oxygen therapy could inform clinical decisions about oxygen administration using low-flow devices.
Face-to-face interviews with a convenience sample of 37 adult patients (17 cardio-thoracic: 20 medical surgical) and 25 intensive care unit nurses were conducted from February 2007 to September 2007. Interviews were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and then analysed using a thematic analysis approach.
The patients identified three key factors that underpinned their compliance with oxygen therapy: (i) device comfort; (ii) ability to maintain activities of daily living; and (iii) therapeutic effect. The nurses identified factors, such as: (i) therapeutic effect, (ii) issues associated with compliance, (iii) strategies to optimize compliance, (iv) familiarity with device, (v) triggers for changing oxygen therapy devices, as being key to the effective management of oxygen therapy.
Differences between the patients' and nurses' perspective of oxygen therapy illustrate the variety of factors that impact on effective oxygen administration. Further research should seek to provide a further in-depth understanding of the current oxygen administration practices of nurses and the patient factors that enhance or hinder effectiveness of oxygen therapy. Detailed information about nurse and patient factors that influence oxygen therapy will inform a sound evidence base for nurses' oxygen administration decisions.

Download full-text


Available from: Glenn Matthew Eastwood,
461 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To describe how intensive care nurses manage the administration of supplemental oxygen to patients during the first 24 hours after cardiac surgery. A retrospective audit was conducted of the medical records of 245 adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery between 1 January 2005 and 31 May 2008 in an Australian metropolitan hospital. Physiological data (oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry and respiratory rate) and intensive care unit management data (oxygen delivery device, oxygen flow rate and duration of mechanical ventilation) were collected at hourly intervals over the first 24 hours of ICU care. Of the 245 patients whose records were audited, 185 were male; mean age was 70 years (SD, 10), and mean APACHE II score was 17.5 (SD, 5.14). Almost half the patients (122, 49.8%) were extubated within 8 hours of ICU admission. The most common oxygen delivery device used immediately after extubation was the simple face mask (214 patients, 87%). Following extubation, patients received supplemental oxygen via, on average, two different delivery devices (range, 1-3), and had the delivery device changed an average of 1.38 times (range, 0-6) during the 24 hours studied. Twenty-two patients (9%) received non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen therapy, and 16 (7%) experienced one or more episode of hypoxaemia during mechanical ventilation. A total of 148 patients (60%) experienced one or more episodes of low oxygenation or abnormal respiratory rate during the first 24 hours of ICU care despite receiving supplemental oxygen. These findings suggest that the ICU environment does not protect cardiac surgical patients from suboptimal oxygen delivery, and highlights the need for strategies to prompt the early initiation of interventions aimed at optimising blood oxygen levels in cardiac surgical patients in the ICU.
    Critical care and resuscitation: journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine 12/2009; 11(4):238-43. · 2.01 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Journal of Clinical Nursing 03/2010; 19(5-6):601-2. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02929.x · 1.26 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intensivists frequently prescribe oxygen therapy for critically ill patients, however little is known about how intensivists manage oxygen therapy, or what factors influence their decisions. We surveyed intensivists listed on the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group database to investigate how intensivists report their approach to the monitoring, prescription and management of risks associated with oxygen therapy. The response rate was 60.4% (99/164 intensivists). Overall 81 (83.5%) respondents practised in metropolitan units and 50 (50.5%) had > or =14 years of intensive care unit specialty practice. All respondents reported using pulse oximetry and > 93% reported having access to a blood gas machine within their intensive care unit. Sixty-one percent of respondents (60/98) reported assessing other indices of tissue oxygenation (pH, lactate, MvO2). Twelve respondents (12.8%) believed that oxygen toxicity was a greater threat to lung injury than barotrauma when commencing mechanical ventilation. A significantly (P = 0.016) greater proportion of regional (5/16) than metropolitan (7/70) respondents were concerned that a high FiO2 is a greater threat to the lungs than barotrauma. For a ventilated acute respiratory distress syndrome patient, 36.8% (36/98 respondents) would not allow an SaO2 of < 85% for < or =15 minutes, and 27.6% (27/96 respondents) would not allow an SaO2 < 90% for > 24 hours. Respondents with < or = 14 years of specialty practice were more likely to specify the oxygen delivery device to be used (P = 0.014). Recognising the factors that currently influence oxygen administration decisions is a necessary prelude to the potential conduct of interventional studies, as well as for the development of better guidance for oxygen therapy in critical care.
    Anaesthesia and intensive care 01/2011; 39(1):122-6. · 1.30 Impact Factor
Show more