Healthcare workers' attitudes to working during pandemic influenza: a qualitative study

Centre for Biomedical Ethics, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
BMC Public Health (Impact Factor: 2.32). 03/2009; 9:56. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-56
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Healthcare workers (HCWs) will play a key role in any response to pandemic influenza, and the UK healthcare system's ability to cope during an influenza pandemic will depend, to a large extent, on the number of HCWs who are able and willing to work through the crisis. UK emergency planning will be improved if planners have a better understanding of the reasons UK HCWs may have for their absenteeism, and what might motivate them to work during an influenza pandemic.This paper reports the results of a qualitative study that explored UK HCWs' views (n = 64) about working during an influenza pandemic, in order to identify factors that might influence their willingness and ability to work and to identify potential sources of any perceived duty on HCWs to work.
A qualitative study, using focus groups (n = 9) and interviews (n = 5).
HCWs across a range of roles and grades tended to feel motivated by a sense of obligation to work through an influenza pandemic. A number of significant barriers that may prevent them from doing so were also identified. Perceived barriers to the ability to work included being ill oneself, transport difficulties, and childcare responsibilities. Perceived barriers to the willingness to work included: prioritising the wellbeing of family members; a lack of trust in, and goodwill towards, the NHS; a lack of information about the risks and what is expected of them during the crisis; fear of litigation; and the feeling that employers do not take the needs of staff seriously. Barriers to ability and barriers to willingness, however, are difficult to separate out.
Although our participants tended to feel a general obligation to work during an influenza pandemic, there are barriers to working, which, if generalisable, may significantly reduce the NHS workforce during a pandemic. The barriers identified are both barriers to willingness and to ability. This suggests that pandemic planning needs to take into account the possibility that staff may be absent for reasons beyond those currently anticipated in UK planning documents. In particular, staff who are physically able to attend work may nonetheless be unwilling to do so. Although there are some barriers that cannot be mitigated by employers (such as illness, transport infrastructure etc.), there are a number of remedial steps that can be taken to lesson the impact of others (providing accommodation, building reciprocity, provision of information and guidance etc). We suggest that barriers to working lie along an ability/willingness continuum, and that absenteeism may be reduced by taking steps to prevent barriers to willingness becoming perceived barriers to ability.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In der Impfprävention stellen die Kommunikation und der Zugang zu Jugendlichen eine besondere Herausforderung dar. Im März 2011 wurden insgesamt 11 moderierte Fokusgruppen mit Jugendlichen mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund, Müttern mit türkischem und russischem Hintergrund sowie mit niedergelassenen Ärzten zur Ermittlung von Barrieren und Ressourcen für impfpräventive Maßnahmen durchgeführt. In den Fokusgruppen zeigte sich, dass die Inanspruchnahme von Impfungen bei Jugendlichen vor allem über die Informations- und Organisationsprozesse in den jeweiligen Familien sowie den Einfluss der impfenden Ärzte gesteuert wird. Bei einer von Jugendlichen als gering wahrgenommenen eigenen Betroffenheit vom Thema ,,Impfen“ ist der nachlassende Kontakt zu Ärzten beim Übergang vom Kind zum Jugendlichen besonders bedeutend. Migrationsbedingte Faktoren können zusätzlich auf diese Prozesse einwirken. Neben der generellen Verbesserung des Zugangs von Jugendlichen zu Informationen und niederschwelligen Impfangeboten erscheinen zusätzliche kultursensible Interventionen zur Verbesserung der kommunikativen Schnittstelle zwischen Müttern und impfenden Ärzten Erfolg versprechende Maßnahmen, um die Impfquoten im Jugendalter zu verbessern.
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 01/2013; 56(10). DOI:10.1007/s00103-013-1800-8 · 1.01 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Emergency response relies on the assumption that essential health care services will continue to operate and be available to provide quality patient care during and after a patient surge. The observed successes and failures of health care systems during recent mass-casualty events and the concern that these assumptions are not evidence based prompted this review. The aims of this systematic review were to explore the factors associated with the intention of health care personnel (HCP) to respond to uncommon events, such as a natural disaster or pandemic, determine the state of the science, and bolster evidence-based measures that have been shown to facilitate staff response. Authors of the 70 studies (five mixed-methods, 49 quantitative, 16 qualitative) that met inclusion criteria reported a variety of variables that influenced the intent of HCP to respond. Current evidence suggests that four primary factors emerged as either facilitating or hindering the willingness of HCP to respond to an event: (1) the nature of the event; (2) competing obligations; (3) the work environment and climate; and (4) the relationship between knowledge and perceptions of efficacy. Findings of this study could influence and strengthen policy making by emergency response planners, staffing coordinators, health educators, and health system administrators. Connor SB . When and why health care personnel respond to a disaster: the state of the science. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(3):1-5 .
    Prehospital and disaster medicine: the official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the World Association for Emergency and Disaster Medicine in association with the Acute Care Foundation 05/2014; DOI:10.1017/S1049023X14000387
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In 2011, an EF5 tornado hit Joplin, MO, requiring complete evacuation of 1 hospital and a patient surge to another. We sought to assess the resilience of healthcare workers in these hospitals as measured by number reporting to work, willingness to work, personal disaster preparedness, and childcare responsibilities following the disaster. In May 2013, a survey was distributed to healthcare workers at both Joplin hospitals that asked them to report their willingness to work and personal disaster preparedness following various disaster scenarios. For those with childcare responsibilities, scheduling, costs, and impact of hypothetical alternative childcare programs were considered in the analyses. A total of 1,234 healthcare workers completed the survey (response rate: 23.4%). Most (87.8%) worked the week following the Joplin tornado. Healthcare workers report more willingness to work during a future earthquake or tornado compared to their pre-Joplin tornado attitudes (86.2 vs 88.4%, t=-4.3, p<.001; 88.4 vs 90%, t=-3.1, p<.01, respectively), with no change during other scenarios. They expressed significantly higher post-tornado personal disaster preparedness, but only preevent preparedness was a significant predictor of postevent preparedness. Nearly half (48.5%, n=598) had childcare responsibilities; 61% (n=366) had childcare needs the week of the tornado, and 54% (n=198) required the use of alternative childcare. If their hospital had provided alternative childcare, 51% would have used it and 42% felt they would have been more willing to report to work. Most healthcare workers reported to work following this disaster, demonstrating true resilience. Disaster planners should be aware of these perceptions as they formulate their own emergency operation plans.
    Biosecurity and bioterrorism: biodefense strategy, practice, and science 07/2014; DOI:10.1089/bsp.2014.0010 · 1.64 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

Available from
Jun 2, 2014