Article

Comparison of Two Questionnaires for Assessing the Severity of Urinary Incontinence: The ICIQ-UI SF Versus the Incontinence Severity Index

Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, Section for General Practice, University of Bergen, Kalfarveien, 31, N-5018, Bergen, Norway.
Neurourology and Urodynamics (Impact Factor: 2.46). 06/2009; 28(5):411-5. DOI: 10.1002/nau.20674
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To compare the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) with the Incontinence Severity Index (ISI), and to propose intervals for four severity levels of ICIQ-UI SF.
Cross-sectional, Internet-based study of 1,812 women responding to a general health questionnaire. Four severity levels for the ICIQ-UI SF scores were constructed by iteratively adjusting the ranges for these levels until maximum Kappa scores were obtained when cross-tabulated with the ISI in a random sample of half of the women with urinary incontinence. Using these intervals, weighted Kappa was calculated for the remaining women as a validation process.
Three hundred forty-three women had urinary incontinence, and completed the ISI and the ICIQ-UI SF. A high correlation between the ISI and ICIQ-UI SF scores with versus without the QoL item was found (Spearman's rho = 0.62, P < 0.01 vs. rho = 0.71, P < 0.01, respectively). Maximum Kappa with quadratic weighting was obtained for the following scale for the ICIQ-UI SF: slight (1-5), moderate (6-12), severe (13-18) and very severe (19-21) (Kappa = 0.61), and without the QoL item: slight (1-3), moderate (4-5), severe (6-9) and very severe (10-11) (Kappa = 0.71) in the development sample. Correspondingly, for the validating sample, maximum Kappa with quadratic weighting was 0.61 and 0.74.
A high correlation between the ICIQ-UI SF and the ISI was found. The ICIQ-UI SF may be divided into the following four severity categories: slight (1-5), moderate (6-12), severe (13-18) and very severe (19-21). Neurourol. Urodynam. 28:411-415, 2009. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

7 Followers
 · 
115 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were used to evaluate outcomes of the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and the AdVance™ (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN, US) male sling system (AVMS) for the symptomatic management of male stress urinary incontinence. Methods All male patients with stress urinary incontinence referred to our specialist clinic over a two-year period completed the ICIQ-UI SF (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire on Urinary Incontinence Short Form) and the ICIQ-MLUTS LF (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire on Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Long Form) at consultation as well as at subsequent follow-up appointments. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for non-parametric paired data was used for pre and postoperative comparisons. The chi-squared test was used for categorical variables. Results Thirty-seven patients (forty surgical cases) completed a preoperative and at least one follow-up questionnaire. There was a statistically significant improvement in PROMs postoperatively, regardless of mode of surgery (p25) had greater improvement with an AUS than with the AVMS (p Conclusions This prospective study shows that completion and collection of PROMs as part of routine clinical practice is achievable and useful in the assessment of male stress incontinence surgery. PROMs are important instruments to assess effectiveness of healthcare intervention and they are useful adjuncts in surgical studies.
    Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England 10/2014; 96(7). DOI:10.1308/003588414X13946184903847 · 1.22 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We present our minimum 1-year results with a mesh spiral-sling procedure (MSSP) for managing refractory and disabling stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women. Thirty-four women were treated with MSSP between 2007 and 2011. Six had incomplete data and were excluded from analysis. Study cohort comprised 21 women with refractory (mean number of previous surgeries 2.2; range 1-6) and seen with primary disabling SUI. All patients had marked intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD) with a Valsalva leak-point pressure (VLPP) < 60 cm H2O. Preoperative workup included assessing the impact of voiding symptoms using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), estimating the daily number of pads, and urodynamic studies. Preoperative and postoperative findings were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Intraoperative unilateral bladder-neck perforation occurred in two women during dorsal urethrolysis. With a mean follow-up of 26 months (range 12-48), SUI was cured in 71.4 % of patients. Distal urethral reconstruction with vaginal mucosal flaps was performed in two patients with short urethral length (< 2.5 cm) due to recurrence of SUI 10 months after MSSP. Mean ICIQ-SF score decreased from 19.4 +/- 3.6 preoperatively to 7.3 +/- 2.8 postoperatively (p = 0.001). Mean daily pad number decreased from 5.2 preoperatively to 1.2 postoperatively (p = 0.02). Urethral or vaginal erosion was not observed in any case during follow-up. Using spiral slings may be a viable option in managing refractory and disabling SUI.
    International Urogynecology Journal 08/2014; 25(10). DOI:10.1007/s00192-013-2224-6 · 2.16 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) might cause anal incontinence (AI) and sexual dysfunction, and might be associated with urinary incontinence (UI). Episiotomy has been identified both as a risk and a protective factor of OASIS. Lately, episiotomies with specific characteristics have shown to be protective against the risk of OASIS. However, little is known about episiotomy characteristics and pelvic floor dysfunction. This study investigates AI, UI, and sexual problems in primiparous women with episiotomy, comparing women with and without OASIS. Associations between episiotomy characteristics and AI, UI, and sexual problems were assessed.Methods This is a matched case¿control study investigating 74 women with one vaginal birth, all with an episiotomy. Among these, 37 women sustained OASIS and were compared to 37 women without OASIS. The two groups were matched for vacuum/forceps. AI, UI and sexual problem symptoms were obtained from St. Mark¿s scoring-tool and self-administered questionnaires. The episiotomy characteristics were investigated and results assessed for the whole group.ResultsThe mean time from birth was 34.5 months (range1.3-78.2) for those with OASIS and 25.9 months (range 7.0-57.4) for those without OASIS, respectively. More women with OASIS reported AI: 14 (38%) vs. 3 (8%) p¿=¿0.05 (OR 4.66, 95% CI 1.34-16.33) as well as more problem with sexual desire p¿=¿0.02 (OR 7.62, 95% CI 1.30-44.64) compared to women without OASIS. We found no association between episiotomy with protective characteristics and dysfunctions.Conclusion Women with OASIS had more AI and sexual problems than those without OASIS. Episiotomy characteristics varied greatly between the women. Episiotomy with protective characteristics was not associated with increased dysfunctions. OASIS should be avoided, and correct episiotomy used if indicated.
    BMC Women's Health 12/2014; 14(1):157. DOI:10.1186/s12905-014-0157-y · 1.66 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

Download
66 Downloads
Available from
May 21, 2014