Comparison of Two Questionnaires for Assessing the Severity of Urinary Incontinence: The ICIQ-UI SF Versus the Incontinence Severity Index

Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, Section for General Practice, University of Bergen, Kalfarveien, 31, N-5018, Bergen, Norway.
Neurourology and Urodynamics (Impact Factor: 2.87). 06/2009; 28(5):411-5. DOI: 10.1002/nau.20674
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To compare the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) with the Incontinence Severity Index (ISI), and to propose intervals for four severity levels of ICIQ-UI SF.
Cross-sectional, Internet-based study of 1,812 women responding to a general health questionnaire. Four severity levels for the ICIQ-UI SF scores were constructed by iteratively adjusting the ranges for these levels until maximum Kappa scores were obtained when cross-tabulated with the ISI in a random sample of half of the women with urinary incontinence. Using these intervals, weighted Kappa was calculated for the remaining women as a validation process.
Three hundred forty-three women had urinary incontinence, and completed the ISI and the ICIQ-UI SF. A high correlation between the ISI and ICIQ-UI SF scores with versus without the QoL item was found (Spearman's rho = 0.62, P < 0.01 vs. rho = 0.71, P < 0.01, respectively). Maximum Kappa with quadratic weighting was obtained for the following scale for the ICIQ-UI SF: slight (1-5), moderate (6-12), severe (13-18) and very severe (19-21) (Kappa = 0.61), and without the QoL item: slight (1-3), moderate (4-5), severe (6-9) and very severe (10-11) (Kappa = 0.71) in the development sample. Correspondingly, for the validating sample, maximum Kappa with quadratic weighting was 0.61 and 0.74.
A high correlation between the ICIQ-UI SF and the ISI was found. The ICIQ-UI SF may be divided into the following four severity categories: slight (1-5), moderate (6-12), severe (13-18) and very severe (19-21). Neurourol. Urodynam. 28:411-415, 2009. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Download full-text


Available from: Atle Klovning, Mar 09, 2014
122 Reads
    • "Barometer, and GAZEL-U, we fitted three cumulative logit models to compare leakage frequency, leakage amount, impact of UI on quality of life (QoL), and the ICIQ-UI-SF score among the three surveys, controlling for age. The ICIQ-UI-SF score was calculated in Fecond and GAZEL-U according to Klovning et al [24]; the higher the score, the more severe is the UI. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Estimates of the prevalence of female urinary incontinence (UI) vary widely. To estimate UI prevalence among women in France using data from five national surveys and analyse prevalence differences among the surveys according to their design (representative sample or not, survey focused on UI or not) and UI definition (based on symptoms or disease perception). Data came from two representative telephone surveys, Fecond (5017 women aged 15-49 yr) and Barometer (3089 women aged 40-85 yr), general and urinary postal surveys of the GAZEL cohort (3098 women aged 54-69 yr), and the web-based NutriNet survey (85 037 women aged 18-87 yr). Definitions of UI based on the International Conference on Incontinence Questionnaire UI short form (ICIQ-UI-SF) and on a list of health problems were considered. We compared age-adjusted prevalence rates among studies via logistic regression and generalised linear models. Overall, 13% of the women in Fecond, 24% in Barometer, 15% in the GAZEL general survey, 39% in the GAZEL urinary survey, and 1.5% in the NutriNet survey reported any UI. Prevalence rates in representative samples with the same UI definition (ICIQ-UI-SF) were concordant. UI prevalence in the representative samples was 17%. The estimated number of women in France with UI was 5.35 million (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.34-5.36 million) for any UI and 1.54 million (95% CI 1.53-1.55 million) for daily UI. For the GAZEL sample, UI prevalence was lower but UI severity was greater for responses to a questionnaire with the list-based UI definition rather than to a questionnaire with the ICIQ-UI-SF-based definition. In all surveys, information about UI was self-reported and was not validated by objective measurements. UI definitions and sampling strategies influence estimates of UI prevalence among women. Precise estimates of UI prevalence should be based on non-UI-focused surveys among representative samples and using a validated standardised symptom-based questionnaire. We looked at estimates of urinary incontinence (UI) prevalence in studies with different designs and different UI definitions in a large population of French women. We found that estimates varied with the definition and the design. We conclude that the most precise estimates of UI prevalence are obtained in studies of representative populations that are not focused on UI and use a validated international standard questionnaire with sufficient details to allow grading of UI severity. Most women reported rare urine leakages involving small amounts of urine with little impact on their quality of life. Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    European Urology 08/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.043 · 13.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Outre les informations générales (âge, poids, taille, pratique de sport, niveau d'études, consommation d'alcool et de tabac), étaient publiés sur le site les documents suivants : une information sur les objectifs de l'enquête, un auto-questionnaire de symptômes urinaires et de qualité de vie (QdV) comprenant l'International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire dans sa forme simplifiée (ICIQ-UI SF) [11] et le Contilife [12], questionnaires validés en français et recommandés dans la prise en charge de l'IU féminine [13]. Les résultats du score ICIQ-IU SF ont été donnés selon la classification proposée A.C. Pizzoferrato et al. par Klovning et al. regroupant les scores en IU légère, IU modérée, IU sévère et IU très sévère [14]. Les critères d'inclusion de notre population étaient les femmes nullipares de plus de 18 ans, sachant lire et écrire le français. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aims To assess the prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) in a population of young nulliparous women and the effectiveness of self-perineal exercises in symptomatic women. Material Three hundred and fifteen nulliparous students from French secondary establishments answered through a secure website, created for the study, an anonymous questionnaire about UI. The questionnaire included validated symptom scores (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, ICIQ-UI SF) and quality of life (Contilife). Women who reported UI were asked to perform a self-perineal rehabilitation program for 8 weeks. A second questionnaire was completed after reeducation to assess the evolution of their UI. Results Among the 315 respondents, 92 women (29.2%) reported UI. The mean age was 23.0 (± 4.4) years in the continent group and 22.9 (± 3.6) years in the incontinent group. Only 24 of the 92 women with UI (26.1%) completed the reeducation program with a significant improvement in UI and quality of life (QoL). Conclusion UI is a common disorder in young nulliparous women. Perineal self-exercises without the intervention of a professional could help to improve the disorders. Level of evidence 5.
    Progrès en Urologie 09/2014; 24(10). DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2014.03.007 · 0.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "On one hand, self-reported UI severity (Sandvik index) correlates (r = 0.761; P = 0.002) with real UI severity (number of leakages in the base line). On the other hand, the more drugs taken, the more self-reported UI severity (r = 0.643; P = 0.013) and the more real UI severity the participants had (r = 0.716; P = 0.004).18 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Urinary incontinence is a medical, psychological, social, economic, and hygienic problem. Although it is difficult to state its prevalence, all authors agree that it is related to age and gender. This study aimed to carry out a urinary incontinence behavioral treatment in order to reduce urine leakages in 14 participants recruited from a senior center. The program consists of daily training of the pelvic floor muscles with a weekly control by a supervisor during a 2-month period and follow-up of results 2 months after the last control session. Urinary incontinence episodes were reduced by 75.67% after program completion. It appears that pelvic floor muscles training, carried out under controlled and constant supervision, significantly reduces urinary leakage. Moreover, maintaining this improvement after treatment depends on the continuation of the exercises as well as on the urinary leakage frequency baseline and the urinary leakage frequency during the last treatment session.
    Clinical Interventions in Aging 06/2011; 6:133-9. DOI:10.2147/CIA.S17945 · 2.08 Impact Factor
Show more