Two-year follow-up of the phase II marker lesion study of intravesical apaziquone for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Inter Mail 659, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
World Journal of Urology (Impact Factor: 3.42). 03/2009; 27(3):337-42. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-009-0382-4
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To study the time-to-recurrence and duration of response in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients, with a complete ablative response after intravesical apaziquone instillations.
Transurethral resection of bladder tumour(s) (TURBT) was performed in patients with multiple pTa-T1 G1-2 urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC) of the bladder, with the exception of one marker lesion of 0.5-1.0 cm. Intravesical apaziquone was administered at weekly intervals for six consecutive weeks, without maintenance instillations. A histological confirmed response was obtained 2-4 weeks after the last instillation. Routine follow-up (FU) was carried out at 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months from the first apaziquone instillation.
At 3 months FU 31 of 46 patients (67.4%) had a complete response (CR) to ablative treatment. Side-effects on the long-term were only mild. Two CR patients dropped out during FU. On intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis 49.5% of the CR patients were recurrence-free at 24 months FU, with a median duration of response of 18 months. Of 15 no response (NR) patients, only two received additional prophylactic instillations after TURBT. On ITT-analysis 26.7% of the NR patients were recurrence-free (log rank test, P = 0.155). The overall recurrence-free survival was 39% (18 of 46 patients) at 24 months FU.
The CR of the marker lesion in 67% of patients was followed by a recurrence-free rate of 56.5% at 1-year FU, and 49.5% at 2-year FU. These long-term results are good in comparison with the results of other ablative studies.


Available from: Henk Vergunst, May 29, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) is the second most common urologic malignancy, and 70% of patients present with superficial or nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is the most effective agent for preventing disease recurrence, and the only therapy able to inhibit disease progression. However, recurrence rates as high as 30% and significant local and systemic toxicity have led to increased interest in alternative intravesical therapies. In patients refractory or intolerant to BCG, BCG-interferon α2b, gemcitabine, and anthracyclines (doxorubicin, epirubicin, valrubicin) have demonstrated durable clinical responses. Phase I trials investigating alternative cytotoxic agents, such as apaziquone, taxanes (docetaxel, paclitaxel), and suramin are reporting promising data. Novel immunomodulating agents have demonstrated promise as efficacious alternatives in patients refractory to BCG. Optimization of existing chemotherapeutic regimens using hyperthermia, photodynamic therapy, magnetically-targeted carriers, and liposomes remains an area of active investigation. Despite enthusiasm for new intravesical agents, radical cystectomy remains the treatment of choice for patients with NMIBC who have failed intravesical therapy and selected patients with naïve T1 tumors and aggressive features. This report provides a comprehensive review of contemporary intravesical therapy for NMIBC and refractory NMIBC, with an emphasis on emerging agents and novel treatment modalities.
    Open Access Journal of Urology 05/2010; 2:67-84. DOI:10.2147/OAJU.S7237
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is a highly prevalent disease and recurrences, after initial therapy, are common. Consequently, the healthcare costs for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer are high. Despite a primary adequate response to adjuvant intravesical treatment, many patients suffer from recurrences, and some even from progression. To date, cystectomy remains the only option for those non-responding patients with high risk of recurrence and progression. Mainly because outcome after progression, in this group, is poor. Therefore, new intravesical therapies are needed. Moreover, new accurate and individual parameters, to distinguish responder from non-responders, will provide additional benefit in clinical decision-making. In this review, current diagnostics and therapies will be discussed. In addition, we will elucidate developing therapies in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
    Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy 11/2013; 13(11):1257-68. DOI:10.1586/14737140.2013.852474 · 2.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Durch die hohe Inzidenz und Rezidivrate des nicht muskelinvasiven Urothelkarzinoms kommt dieser Tumorentität eine besondere Bedeutung zu. Innovative diagnostische Verfahren stellen die „Raman spectroscopy“ und die optische Kohärenztomographie dar. Uringebundene Markersysteme spielen nach wie vor keine zentrale Rolle. An neuen therapeutischen Optionen werden die Chemohyperthermie und MMC-EMDA-Therapie vorgestellt, sowie Gemcitabine und Apaziquone als neue Substanzen für die intravesikale Therapie.
    Der Urologe 06/2012; 51(6). DOI:10.1007/s00120-012-2897-3 · 0.44 Impact Factor