[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: As yet, there is no patient-assessed, condition-specific instrument for the assessment of health-related quality of life in intermittent claudication. We evaluated the intermittent claudication questionnaire (ICQ) for properties required of a measure of health outcome.
Interviews with patients with intermittent claudication and vascular specialist opinion produced a pool of statements used to itemize a self-completed ICQ. This was piloted in 20 patients for practicality and then administered to 124 stable claudicants. Reliability was assessed through a retest in 63 (51%) patients at 14 days and analysis of Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to assess construct validity in comparisons between the ICQ and ankle brachial pressure index, treadmill-walking distances, the walking impairment questionnaire, the EuroQol, and the Short Form-36. Responsiveness of the ICQ to changes in health was assessed in 60 patients treated conservatively and 40 patients undergoing angioplasty. The standardized response mean was used to identify the most responsive instrument in the study. A 16-item ICQ with a test-retest intraclass correlation of 0.95 and Cronbach's alpha of.94 was produced. One hundred twenty-one (98%) patients completed the ICQ (mean time, 3.7 minutes). The ICQ correlated better with the EuroQol (r = 0.58) and 7 out of 8 subscales of the Short Form-36 (r = 0.33-0.68) compared with the walking impairment questionnaire. The ICQ demonstrated the largest standardized response mean in relation to health transition compared with the other instruments.
The patient-assessed ICQ is a practical, reliable, valid, and responsive measure of patient health-related quality of life in intermittent claudication.
Journal of Vascular Surgery 11/2002; 36(4):764-71; discussion 863-4. · 2.98 Impact Factor
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Endovascular therapy is a rapidly evolving field for the treatment of patients with peripheral arterial disease, and a magnitude of studies reporting on various modern revascularization concepts have been recently published. Thus, studies assessing the efficacy of endovascular therapy of peripheral arteries do not operate with uniformly defined endpoints, rendering a direct comparison of studies difficult. The purpose of this consensus statement is to highlight differences in the terminology used in the current literature and to propose some standardized criteria that must be considered when reporting results of endovascular revascularization for chronic ischaemia of lower limb arteries.
European Heart Journal 05/2007; 28(7):798-805. · 14.72 Impact Factor
British Journal of Surgery 09/2007; 94(8):923-4. · 5.21 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.