Barriers to emergency departments' adherence to four medication safety-related Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goals

Emergency Nurses Association, Des Plaines, Illinois, USA.
Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety / Joint Commission Resources 02/2009; 35(1):49-59.
Source: PubMed


Medication errors are a serious public health threat, causing patient injury and death and sharply increasing health care costs. Serious preventable errors are most likely to occur in areas of increased complexity and technology, such as the emergency department (ED). Although The Joint Commission in 2002 approved the first set of National Patient Safety Goals (NPSGs) to decrease the occurrence of health care errors, the literature suggests that the goals are not fully implemented. In 2006, the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA) conducted a national, multisite survey (1) to describe barriers to full implementation of the 2006 NPSGs related to medication safety (then known as Goals 1, 2, 3, and 8) as reported by ED registered nurses (ED nurses) and (2) to investigate factors related to those barriers.
ED nurses (n = 2,220), managers (n = 129), and site coordinators (n = 126) representing 131 EDs completed surveys concerning NPSG implementation, policies, and barriers. Nonparametric statistical methods were used to analyze the data.
ED nurses frequently reported barriers to adherence to NPSGs. Patient safety education was not related to NPSG adherence. A complex work environment, such as that associated with residents in training, mixed-shift hours, and state designation as a trauma center, was associated with reduced NPSG adherence.
The low response rate (4.6%) to this study inherently limits the overall generalizability of the findings to the greater population of EDs. Yet, the findings suggest that substantial barriers remain to ED adherence to the NPSGs related to medication safety. Efforts to reduce the barriers should focus on system changes that facilitate adherence. Health care providers and their organizations must commit to and enforce a zero-tolerance policy for preventable medication errors.

Download full-text


Available from: Jessica Gacki-Smith,
  • Source
    • "For both the prehospital and ED setting adherence showed a wide variation. Suboptimal adherence has also been shown in other critical care fields, such as the intensive care unit [53,54] and the recovery room [55,56], but also on more general topics as hand hygiene [57] and medication safety [58]. It is possible that the wide variation in adherence is due to often poor evidence-based prehospital guidelines [59], to differences in guideline quality or due to justified deviations as guidelines have to be tailored to unique patients. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A gap between guidelines or protocols and clinical practice often exists, which may result in patients not receiving appropriate care. Therefore, the objectives of this systematic review were (1) to give an overview of professionals' adherence to (inter)national guidelines and protocols in the emergency medical dispatch, prehospital and emergency department (ED) settings, and (2) to explore which factors influencing adherence were described in studies reporting on adherence. PubMed (including MEDLINE), CINAHL, EMBASE and the Cochrane database for systematic reviews were systematically searched. Reference lists of included studies were also searched for eligible studies. Identified articles were screened on title, abstract and year of publication (>=1990) and were included when reporting on adherence in the eligible settings. Following the initial selection, articles were screened full text and included if they concerned adherence to a (inter)national guideline or protocol, and if the time interval between data collection and publication date was <10 years. Finally, articles were assessed on reporting quality. Each step was undertaken by two independent researchers. Thirty-five articles met the criteria, none of these addressed the emergency medical dispatch setting or protocols. Median adherence ranged from 7.8-95% in the prehospital setting, and from 0-98% in the ED setting. In the prehospital setting, recommendations on monitoring came with higher median adherence percentages than treatment recommendations. For both settings, cardiology treatment recommendations came with relatively low median adherence percentages. Eight studies identified patient and organisational factors influencing adherence. The results showed that professionals' adherence to (inter)national prehospital and emergency department guidelines shows a wide variation, while adherence in the emergency medical dispatch setting is not reported. As insight in influencing factors for adherence in the emergency care settings is minimal, future research should identify such factors to allow the development of strategies to improve adherence and thus improve quality of care.
    Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 02/2013; 21(1):9. DOI:10.1186/1757-7241-21-9 · 2.03 Impact Factor

  • Annals of Emergency Medicine 09/2009; 54(3):S44. DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.06.169 · 4.68 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We assess the impact of emergency department (ED) pharmacists on reducing potentially harmful medication errors. We conducted this observational study in 4 academic EDs. Trained pharmacy residents observed a convenience sample of ED pharmacists' activities. The primary outcome was medication errors recovered by pharmacists, including errors intercepted before reaching the patient (near miss or potential adverse drug event), caught after reaching the patient but before causing harm (mitigated adverse drug event), or caught after some harm but before further or worsening harm (ameliorated adverse drug event). Pairs of physician and pharmacist reviewers confirmed recovered medication errors and assessed their potential for harm. Observers were unblinded and clinical outcomes were not evaluated. We conducted 226 observation sessions spanning 787 hours and observed pharmacists reviewing 17,320 medications ordered or administered to 6,471 patients. We identified 504 recovered medication errors, or 7.8 per 100 patients and 2.9 per 100 medications. Most of the recovered medication errors were intercepted potential adverse drug events (90.3%), with fewer mitigated adverse drug events (3.9%) and ameliorated adverse drug events (0.2%). The potential severities of the recovered errors were most often serious (47.8%) or significant (36.2%). The most common medication classes associated with recovered medication errors were antimicrobial agents (32.1%), central nervous system agents (16.2%), and anticoagulant and thrombolytic agents (14.1%). The most common error types were dosing errors, drug omission, and wrong frequency errors. ED pharmacists can identify and prevent potentially harmful medication errors. Controlled trials are necessary to determine the net costs and benefits of ED pharmacist staffing on safety, quality, and costs, especially important considerations for smaller EDs and pharmacy departments.
    Annals of emergency medicine 12/2009; 55(6):513-21. DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.10.012 · 4.68 Impact Factor
Show more