Barriers to emergency departments' adherence to four medication safety-related Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goals.

Emergency Nurses Association, Des Plaines, Illinois, USA.
Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety / Joint Commission Resources 02/2009; 35(1):49-59.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Medication errors are a serious public health threat, causing patient injury and death and sharply increasing health care costs. Serious preventable errors are most likely to occur in areas of increased complexity and technology, such as the emergency department (ED). Although The Joint Commission in 2002 approved the first set of National Patient Safety Goals (NPSGs) to decrease the occurrence of health care errors, the literature suggests that the goals are not fully implemented. In 2006, the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA) conducted a national, multisite survey (1) to describe barriers to full implementation of the 2006 NPSGs related to medication safety (then known as Goals 1, 2, 3, and 8) as reported by ED registered nurses (ED nurses) and (2) to investigate factors related to those barriers.
ED nurses (n = 2,220), managers (n = 129), and site coordinators (n = 126) representing 131 EDs completed surveys concerning NPSG implementation, policies, and barriers. Nonparametric statistical methods were used to analyze the data.
ED nurses frequently reported barriers to adherence to NPSGs. Patient safety education was not related to NPSG adherence. A complex work environment, such as that associated with residents in training, mixed-shift hours, and state designation as a trauma center, was associated with reduced NPSG adherence.
The low response rate (4.6%) to this study inherently limits the overall generalizability of the findings to the greater population of EDs. Yet, the findings suggest that substantial barriers remain to ED adherence to the NPSGs related to medication safety. Efforts to reduce the barriers should focus on system changes that facilitate adherence. Health care providers and their organizations must commit to and enforce a zero-tolerance policy for preventable medication errors.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We assess the impact of emergency department (ED) pharmacists on reducing potentially harmful medication errors. We conducted this observational study in 4 academic EDs. Trained pharmacy residents observed a convenience sample of ED pharmacists' activities. The primary outcome was medication errors recovered by pharmacists, including errors intercepted before reaching the patient (near miss or potential adverse drug event), caught after reaching the patient but before causing harm (mitigated adverse drug event), or caught after some harm but before further or worsening harm (ameliorated adverse drug event). Pairs of physician and pharmacist reviewers confirmed recovered medication errors and assessed their potential for harm. Observers were unblinded and clinical outcomes were not evaluated. We conducted 226 observation sessions spanning 787 hours and observed pharmacists reviewing 17,320 medications ordered or administered to 6,471 patients. We identified 504 recovered medication errors, or 7.8 per 100 patients and 2.9 per 100 medications. Most of the recovered medication errors were intercepted potential adverse drug events (90.3%), with fewer mitigated adverse drug events (3.9%) and ameliorated adverse drug events (0.2%). The potential severities of the recovered errors were most often serious (47.8%) or significant (36.2%). The most common medication classes associated with recovered medication errors were antimicrobial agents (32.1%), central nervous system agents (16.2%), and anticoagulant and thrombolytic agents (14.1%). The most common error types were dosing errors, drug omission, and wrong frequency errors. ED pharmacists can identify and prevent potentially harmful medication errors. Controlled trials are necessary to determine the net costs and benefits of ED pharmacist staffing on safety, quality, and costs, especially important considerations for smaller EDs and pharmacy departments.
    Annals of emergency medicine 12/2009; 55(6):513-21. DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.10.012 · 4.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    American journal of health-system pharmacy: AJHP: official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 12/2011; 68(23):e81-95. DOI:10.2146/sp110020e · 2.21 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract: Background: Patient safety is a significant challenge facing healthcare systems today. An important part of patient safety is the issue of medication administration within the acute-care setting that has long been the focus of scrutiny and research because it contributes directly to patient morbidity and mortality. Aim: The current study aimed to assess the input from nurses based on their clinical experiences towards perception of occurrence and reporting of medication administration errors, as well as the extent to which errors are reported on their units. Design: The study used a descriptive cross-sectional survey using self-report questionnaire. Setting: The present study was carried out in all departments of King Khalid Public Governorate Hospital in Hafer El-Batin at Kingdom Saudi Arabia. Subjects: A convenience sample of 253 nursing staff worked in the previous mentioned setting. Tools: The data gathering tool was Medication Administration Errors (MAEs) Reporting Questionnaire which was developed by Wakefield et al. (1996) and was modified by the researchers. It contained 65 questions; 29 items regarding reasons why medication errors occur, 16 items regarding reasons why medication errors not reporting and 20 items regarding what percentage of each type of medication error actually reported on units which divided into 9 items for non intravenous and 11 items for intravenous medication administration errors. Results: This study suggested five categories for reasons of why MAEs occur and three categories for reasons of why MAEs not reporting. Nurses perceive low percentages of MAEs reporting. Emergency room was more likely to report medication administration errors than other units. Conclusion: Medication errors are common in clinical practice. Actually, reducing these errors requires the commitment of everyone with a stake in keeping patients safe; physician who wrote the prescription, pharmacist who dispensed it and the nurse who received the medicine and administered to the patient, all play an important role in preventing medication errors reaching to patient. Recommendation: This study recommended for provision of ongoing education & training on safe medication administration and utilization of medication information guide though developing self-report logbook.
Show more