The Rising Prevalence of Chronic Low Back Pain

The Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7590, USA.
Archives of internal medicine (Impact Factor: 13.25). 03/2009; 169(3):251-8. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.543
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT National or state-level estimates on trends in the prevalence of chronic low back pain (LBP) are lacking. The objective of this study was to determine whether the prevalence of chronic LBP and the demographic, health-related, and health care-seeking characteristics of individuals with the condition have changed over the last 14 years.
A cross-sectional, telephone survey of a representative sample of North Carolina households was conducted in 1992 and repeated in 2006. A total of 4437 households were contacted in 1992 and 5357 households in 2006 to identify noninstitutionalized adults 21 years or older with chronic (>3 months), impairing LBP or neck pain that limits daily activities. These individuals were interviewed in more detail about their health and health care seeking.
The prevalence of chronic, impairing LBP rose significantly over the 14-year interval, from 3.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.4%-4.4%) in 1992 to 10.2% (95% CI, 9.3%-11.0%) in 2006. Increases were seen for all adult age strata, in men and women, and in white and black races. Symptom severity and general health were similar for both years. The proportion of individuals who sought care from a health care provider in the past year increased from 73.1% (95% CI, 65.2%-79.8%) to 84.0% (95% CI, 80.8%-86.8%), while the mean number of visits to all health care providers were similar (19.5 [1992] vs 19.4 [2006]).
The prevalence of chronic, impairing LBP has risen significantly in North Carolina, with continuing high levels of disability and health care use. A substantial portion of the rise in LBP care costs over the past 2 decades may be related to this rising prevalence.

Download full-text


Available from: Andrea S Wallace, Jun 30, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation programmes are found decreasing pain and improve back-to-work rates. There is, however, a lack of knowledge in several respects. The overall aim of this thesis was to study outcomes in terms of occupational performance, satisfaction with performance, psychosocial functioning, disability, and coping profiles at a one-year follow-up after a musculoskeletal pain rehabilitation programme. Part of the aim was to evaluate differences among subgroups of participants based on baseline characteristics and pain-related severities, regarding the above described outcomes. Better psychosocial functioning and less severe disability were in a sample of 509 individuals (Paper I) associated with: older age, being at work prior admission, being Nordic born, longer education, a diagnosis of fibromyalgia (compared with neck disorder or low back pain). At a one-year follow-up psychosocial functioning was significantly improved whereas less improvement was found in physical disability. Improvements at one-year follow-up were independently of participants’ characteristics. The participants’ prioritized occupational problems in all sorts of occupations pertaining to looking after one self (self-care), enjoying life (leisure), and contributing to the social and economic fabric of a community (productivity). The most prioritized subcategory of occupations to be improved on was household management (Paper II). The most frequently reported occupations were reported as: working, sitting and cleaning the house. Occupational performance and satisfaction with performance improved significantly at discharge and at the follow-up (Paper III). Improvements on occupational performance at follow-up were significantly associated with the following factors: female gender, less physical disability, less life interference and more life control at baseline. However, participants with most perceived severities to perform their prioritized occupations had significantly higher chance to be improved. The pain coping profiles of Adaptive Copers significantly increased at the follow-up, whereas the Dysfunctional profiles significantly decreased (Paper IV). Having an Adaptive Coper profile at follow-up was associated with improvement on occupational performance and was significantly associated with: being Nordic born, having a longer education and an Adaptive Coper profile and higher scores on satisfaction with occupational performance at baseline. Having an Adaptive Coper profile at follow-up was significantly associated with improvements on occupational performance and satisfaction with performance.
    04/2014, Supervisor: Jan Lexell, Mona Eklund and Marcelo Rivano Fischer
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Exercise has been shown to reduce pain and increase function in patients with chronic low back pain. However up to 70% of patients do not engage in prescribed home exercise. Physiotherapists need to understand more about the complex factors influencing patients' adherence to prescribed home exercise to tailor their exercise interventions more effectively and support patients to self-manage. This review identifies factors associated with adherence to health care practitioner-prescribed home exercise in adults with chronic low back pain. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used for the reporting of this review. We explored literature in which the authors studied adherence to home exercise in adults with CLBP. Adherence to home exercise was the primary outcome. Additional outcome measures were recorded in the data extraction table. The following databases were searched: Embase, PsychINFO, MEDLINE, PEDro, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Data were independently extracted and assessed for methodologic quality by two reviewers. Eleven randomized controlled trials, including 1,088 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Moderate evidence was found for one individual patient subfactor and three intervention-related subfactors associated with increased adherence to home exercise. These subfactors were greater health locus of control, supervision, participation in an exercise program, and participation in a general behavior change program incorporating motivational strategies. This is the first systematic review investigating adherence to prescribed home exercise in a chronic low back pain population. It is difficult to draw firm conclusions because the research lacks detailed descriptions of intervention content. The use of a taxonomy of behavior change techniques has been suggested to overcome this key problem. This review has highlighted the lack of standardized measures of adherence to prescribed home exercise. The development of a validated measure of adherence should be a priority because this will provide a better understanding of the multitude of factors that may influence adherence to home exercise.
    The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society 10/2013; 13(12). DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.027 · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intravenous (IV) bisphosphonates relieve pain in conditions such as Paget's disease of bone, metastatic bone disease and multiple myeloma. Based on positive findings from a prior case series, we conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled study to assess the analgesic effect of IV pamidronate in subjects with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and evidence of degenerative disease of the spine. Four groups of 11 subjects (7 active, 4 placebo) were enrolled at escalating dose levels of 30, 60, 90, and 180 mg pamidronate (the latter administered as two 90 mg infusions). Primary outcomes were safety and change from baseline in average daily pain scores, recorded at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months post-infusion using electronic diaries. Secondary outcomes included responder rate, daily worst pain, and pain-related interference of daily function. There were no pamidronate-related serious adverse events or other significant safety findings. A statistically significant overall treatment difference in pain scores was observed, with clinically meaningful effects persisting for 6 months in the 180 mg pamidronate group. Least square mean changes in daily average pain score were -1.39 (SE=0.43) for placebo, and -1.53 (0.71), -1.26 (0.81), -1.42 (0.65), and -4.13 (0.65) for pamidronate 30, 60, 90 and 180 mg, respectively (p=0.012 for pamidronate 180 mg versus placebo). The proportion of responders, changes in worst pain and pain interference of daily function were also significantly improved for pamidronate 180 mg compared to placebo. In conclusion, IV pamidronate, administered as two 90 mg infusions, decreased pain intensity for 6 months in subjects with CLBP.
    Pain 09/2013; 155(1). DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2013.09.016 · 5.84 Impact Factor